The Guardian view on housing policy: Grenfell survivors deserve better | Editorial

It makes no sense to delay reforms for renters and ignore the cladding crisis while embarking on a planning overhaul

The Grenfell inquiry continues, and as the contractors on the tower’s refurbishment give their evidence, a murky picture becomes clearer. Before the hearings paused in March due to Covid, emails from the cladding manufacturer, Arconic, revealed the company knew the panels were not suitable for use on building facades in Europe. Since the inquiry resumed in July, information has emerged about the close relationship between the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation and its main contractor, Rydon, and about Rydon’s dealings with architects and subcontractors. Among shocking revelations has been that Rydon promised five times to appoint fire safety advisers, but didn’t.

Last week came the turn of Harley Facades, which installed the cladding. Its owner, Ray Bailey, said his company was not “ultimately” responsible for the building’s compliance with building regulations. In what has become a familiar theme, “price and aesthetics” were shown to have been judged more important than safety.

Bereaved and survivors’ groups are unhappy to have been excluded from the inquiry due to the risk of infection. Karim Mussilhy, whose uncle died in the fire, pointed out that with no guarantee of prosecutions, this could be “the only way we get to see these people”. They were also furious that their local MP, Felicity Buchan, voted against a Labour amendment to the fire safety bill that, had it passed, would have forced the government to implement the recommendations of the inquiry’s first phase.

Ms Buchan published a statement defending her decision, and insisting that the issue is one of timing. But campaigners are right that ministers have watered down some of the inquiry’s recommendations, including quarterly fire door checks. They are right, too, to challenge the government to follow through on commitments to improve the position of renters. A long-expected social housing white paper should have taken priority over the planning overhaul announced in August. So should plans to deal with more than 300 high-rise residential buildings still covered with aluminium composite material. The current standoff between building owners who are refusing to pay for remediation, and the government, has placed thousands of tenants and leaseholders in an impossible position. Fire safety problems with different kinds of cladding continue to emerge.

Housebuilding could be part of the solution to the UK’s housing crisis, as long as new homes are built to stringent environmental standards. Retrofitting insulation, installing solar panels and other improvements to existing housing stock should form part of the post-Covid recovery. For ministers to prioritise new development over so many unresolved issues is irresponsible. It is more than 18 months since the case for a new regulator and national tenants’ organisation was made by a commission set up by the charity, Shelter. Boris Johnson and the housing secretary, Robert Jenrick, must answer for their failure to follow through on these and other recommendations.

Having vacillated for years over whether to end no-fault evictions and extend tenancies, ministers are set to end a ban brought in to protect people during the pandemic. While some exceptions have been promised, there is little doubt that homelessness will once again rise. At least it should be clear to the public, following the recent reduction in rough sleeping, that this chronic and harmful instability is a choice. There is nothing but their own reluctance stopping ministers from changing the law in such a way as to rebalance tenant-landlord relations, and strengthen people’s entitlement to a safe place to live.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on Grenfell secrets: regeneration shame | Editorial
Editorial: Evidence of ‘offline’ negotiations and altered priorities is exposing the attitude of the authorities to the tower and its residents

Editorial

18, Oct, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the cladding scandal: rip off panels, not people | Editorial
Editorial: Ordinary leaseholders must not be expected to pay the price for decades of failed housing regulation

Editorial

02, Feb, 2021 @6:50 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell Inquiry: justice delayed | Editorial
Editorial: Confidence in the process was shaken before Covid-19 interrupted. But three years on from the fire, the campaign continues

Editorial

11, Jun, 2020 @5:39 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on social housing: we need a cultural shift | Editorial
Editorial: The failure to provide adequate public sector rented housing in England is acknowledged across party lines as a catastrophe. A commission has put forward practical proposals

Editorial

13, Jan, 2019 @6:54 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on planning: put people before profit | Editorial
Editorial: New green homes are needed, but the prime minister’s promise to cut “red tape” is a soundbite not a solution

Editorial

06, Aug, 2020 @5:57 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the cladding scandal: don’t punish the innocent | Editorial
Editorial: Leaseholders didn’t build these high-rises and they didn’t certify them as safe. So why are they being landed with the giant bills to fix them?

Editorial

28, Apr, 2021 @5:50 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Grenfell, two years on: the survivors’ campaign deserves results | Editorial
Editorial: Ministers should take more notice of the disaster’s survivors, who are right to say a new, proactive social housing regulator is required

Editorial

13, Jun, 2019 @5:21 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell anniversary: sorry is not enough | Editorial
Editorial: Radical changes to housing, including improved safety, would be a fitting legacy

Editorial

13, Jun, 2018 @5:32 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell Tower inquiry: necessary but not sufficient | Editorial
Editorial: An obsession with deregulation of building fire regulations meant warning signs of looming disaster seem to have been missed on the watch of Conservative ministers

Editorial

20, May, 2018 @5:05 PM

Article image
I survived Grenfell. There is enough pain, we don’t deserve to be mocked | Natasha Elcock
The Grenfell bonfire video perpetuated falsehoods about us, says survivor and Grenfell United chair Natasha Elcock

Natasha Elcock

06, Nov, 2018 @5:17 PM