The Guardian view on Grenfell secrets: regeneration shame | Editorial

Evidence of ‘offline’ negotiations and altered priorities is exposing the attitude of the authorities to the tower and its residents

What began in the stunned aftermath of the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017 continues at the public inquiry. Establishing, through an examination of the facts, who was responsible for the deaths of 72 people and the loss of hundreds of homes is the first step towards holding those people or organisations accountable.

Nicholas Holgate, chief executive of Kensington and Chelsea council at the time of the fire (though not during the tower’s refurbishment), was the first authority figure to quit his post, a week after the tragedy. Pressured to resign by the then communities secretary, Sajid Javid, Mr Holgate said his presence would be a “distraction”. A week later, Nicholas Paget-Brown resigned as the council’s leader. Robert Black, the chief executive of the tenant management organisation (TMO) that ran the block, also stepped aside in June 2017 to “concentrate on assisting with the investigation and inquiry” (for which he initially continued to receive a salary). The TMO was later dissolved, as the council took back responsibility for its social housing.

Under a new leader, Elizabeth Campbell, the local Conservatives – who have run Kensington and Chelsea council since it was formed in 1964 – stabilised. Members who were not closely tied to the decisions made about Grenfell spoke to journalists and television crews. In 2018, less than a year after the fire, they emerged victorious from local elections – losing just one seat (to Labour). In December last year, a Tory, Felicity Buchan, took the Kensington seat in parliament from Labour.

Flammable cladding has proved as difficult to shift as the Tories in Kensington. In June this year, a deadline for Grenfell-style material to be removed from all high-rises was missed, leaving tens of thousands of leaseholders trapped in unsellable homes during lockdown. A pledge by ministers to end no-fault evictions remains unfulfilled, despite Labour offering to back it. Proposals for a new regulator have gone nowhere.

With no arrests made, for now survivors’ hopes are pinned on Sir Martin Moore-Bick’s inquiry. The announcement last December that the London fire brigade chief, Dany Cotton, would retire six months early was greeted with relief. Ms Cotton had said in her evidence that the fire was as unexpected as “a space shuttle landing on the Shard”, and that she would do nothing differently if faced with the same situation.

But there have also been frustrations, including a ban on observers at the hearings due to the pandemic and the time taken to appoint a third panel member after a previous appointee was forced to step down due to a connection with the cladding manufacturer. Last week, that hiatus ended with the announcement that Ali Akbor, a housing association chief, had been selected.

Since campaigners have always believed that the council and the TMO’s attitude to their North Kensington neighbourhood was a factor in the way that events unfolded, the contribution of a person with first-hand knowledge of community relations was felt to be essential. That perception has only been strengthened by evidence at the inquiry, such as the discovery that the tower’s refurbishment was described by a council officer as an attempt to “prevent it from looking like a poor cousin”. Recent hearings have focused on repeated efforts to drive down the cost of the building work, including by Laura Johnson, the director of housing for Kensington and Chelsea council, who overruled the TMO by deciding to ditch the original contractor and re-tender, with “value for money” the top priority. (This despite the council’s claim in its opening submission to the inquiry that the TMO was in charge.)

Last week, the inquiry heard details of a “secret” and “offline” meeting between David Gibson of the TMO and the contractor, Rydon, in which it was agreed that £800,000 in savings would be made, including by switching zinc panels for the aluminium ones that became the main cause of the fire’s spread. The conversation took place despite warnings from the TMO’s lawyers that such negotiations would break EU regulations.

The time for definitive and official conclusions remains some way off. There is, however, every reason to believe that the fury of Grenfell’s survivors will turn out to have been not just understandable but correct.

• This article was amended on 19 October 2020. A previous version referred to a former Grenfell inquiry panellist’s link to “one of the contractors” involved in the tower’s refurbishment. In fact the connection was to Arconic, the cladding manufacturer. The article’s main image was also changed for reasons of sensitivity.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell anniversary: sorry is not enough | Editorial
Editorial: Radical changes to housing, including improved safety, would be a fitting legacy

Editorial

13, Jun, 2018 @5:32 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the cladding scandal: don’t punish the innocent | Editorial
Editorial: Leaseholders didn’t build these high-rises and they didn’t certify them as safe. So why are they being landed with the giant bills to fix them?

Editorial

28, Apr, 2021 @5:50 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on housing policy: Grenfell survivors deserve better | Editorial
Editorial: It makes no sense to delay reforms for renters and ignore the cladding crisis while embarking on a planning overhaul

Editorial

13, Sep, 2020 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on social housing: we need a cultural shift | Editorial
Editorial: The failure to provide adequate public sector rented housing in England is acknowledged across party lines as a catastrophe. A commission has put forward practical proposals

Editorial

13, Jan, 2019 @6:54 PM

Article image
The Grenfell families have made us safer. The inquiry must listen to them | Seraphima Kennedy
Survivors’ campaigning has been effective, says Seraphima Kennedy, a writer and academic researcher

Seraphima Kennedy

03, Oct, 2018 @7:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell Inquiry: justice delayed | Editorial
Editorial: Confidence in the process was shaken before Covid-19 interrupted. But three years on from the fire, the campaign continues

Editorial

11, Jun, 2020 @5:39 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the cladding scandal: rip off panels, not people | Editorial
Editorial: Ordinary leaseholders must not be expected to pay the price for decades of failed housing regulation

Editorial

02, Feb, 2021 @6:50 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell Tower inquiry: necessary but not sufficient | Editorial
Editorial: An obsession with deregulation of building fire regulations meant warning signs of looming disaster seem to have been missed on the watch of Conservative ministers

Editorial

20, May, 2018 @5:05 PM

Article image
Grenfell Tower, one year on: community members discuss | Zain Miah and others
On the first anniversary of the west London disaster that claimed 72 lives, many questions remain. Zain Miah, Cathy Long, Lucy Masoud, Daniel Renwick and Pilgrim Tucker reflect on its impact

Zain Miah, Cathy Long, Lucy Masoud, Daniel Renwick and Pilgrim Tucker

14, Jun, 2018 @8:27 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on Grenfell, two years on: the survivors’ campaign deserves results | Editorial
Editorial: Ministers should take more notice of the disaster’s survivors, who are right to say a new, proactive social housing regulator is required

Editorial

13, Jun, 2019 @5:21 PM