The Guardian view on the Led Zeppelin verdict: a victory for creativity | Editorial

The famous guitar sequence at the start of Stairway to Heaven was not a case of musical plagiarism

In a waspish lecture entitled The Hero as Man of Letters, the Victorian essayist and philosopher Thomas Carlyle sought to debunk the fashionable notion of the solitary Romantic genius. This idea, he suggested in 1840, was a contemporary fantasy: “Never, till about a hundred years ago, was there seen any figure of a Great Soul living apart in that anomalous manner; endeavouring to speak forth the inspiration that was in him by Printed Books.” It didn’t work. Despite Carlyle’s best efforts, the alluring notion of pure, unmediated self-expression in the arts never really went away. As a consequence, from the Romantic era onwards, the moral implications of plagiarism began to become a seriously hot issue. If the best art was a unique emanation from the depth of an individual’s soul, it was an outrage of the highest order to nick it and put it in your own stuff.

Which brings us to Led Zeppelin and Stairway to Heaven, their classic track from 1971. This week, in the latest twist in a long-running saga, a San Francisco appeals court reinstated a verdict that the venerated English rock band did not steal a guitar riff in the song from Spirit, a California band of the same era. Michael Skidmore, a trustee for a late member of Spirit, had won an initial appeal, after claiming that the famous descending chord progression that opens Stairway was lifted from Spirit’s song Taurus, released in 1968.

Musical plagiarism has become a vexed issue in the United States music industry, in an age of sampling and sensitivities over cultural appropriation. Five years ago Marvin Gaye’s children were awarded $7.4m after jurors decided that, in their 2013 hit single Blurred Lines, Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams had copied Gaye’s Got to Give It Up, from 1977. But when it comes to the question of who owns the opening sequence of perhaps the most celebrated rock song of all, it is hard not to conclude that Mr Skidmore has fallen for the old Romantic conceit. Because the truth is that no one does.

The two snatches of music in Stairway and Taurus are undoubtedly very similar. But descending chromatic chords, which can convey a soulful, almost mystical melancholy, were highly popular in the often dreamy guitar music of the late 60s and early 70s. They also feature, as the court heard, in songs such as Chim Chim Cher-ee from the 1964 film Mary Poppins. In previous centuries, JS Bach and Henry Purcell were fans.

Copyright rulings should not be so draconian that they inhibit the creative process. Sometimes a kind of music or thinking is a common cultural resource; its inflections and idioms can subconsciously influence and inspire an age, a moment or a mood. Mr Page testified in 2016 that the disputed chord sequence “had been around for ever”. A seminal study of plagiarism in the Romantic period by Tilar J Mazzeo points out that, at that time, culpable borrowing was defined as that which is “simultaneously unacknowledged, unimproved, unfamiliar, and conscious”. Led Zeppelin lovers can rest easy on that score.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
A hit, a writ: why music is the food of plagiarism lawsuits
With Katy Perry and Led Zeppelin’s recent judgments reversing previous rulings, musicians don’t know which way to tread

Michael Hann

26, Mar, 2020 @7:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on lockdown creativity: a freedom for female musicians? | Editorial
Editorial: For some the domestic space has offered artistic liberation at odds with the home’s reputation as a place of constraint for women

Editorial

02, Aug, 2020 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Spotify: I have a stream | Editorial
Editorial: Spotify cannot be a monarch in music. Its users must be able to hold it to account for its actions

Editorial

02, Jan, 2019 @6:26 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Korean soft power: harder than it looks | Editorial
Editorial: Pop music and TV shows might not sound like a serious business, but public diplomacy matters – whatever form it comes in

Editorial

28, Oct, 2022 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on B-sides: a lost serendipity | Editorial
Editorial: The profusion of digital music has drowned out collective experience in a welter of algorithmic choice

Editorial

01, Apr, 2018 @5:15 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Taylor Swift book rumour: a TikTok reckoning | Editorial
Editorial: Fans bought into a false viral claim that a mystery title – actually on BTS – was by the star. They won’t be the last to be fooled

Editorial

12, May, 2023 @5:25 PM

Article image
Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke and TI launch appeal against Blurred Lines verdict
Lawyers for the trio argue the judge was wrong to allow comparison of the recordings of the hit and Marvin Gaye’s Got to Give It Up

Guardian music

25, Aug, 2016 @7:32 AM

Article image
Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams to pay $5m in final Blurred Lines verdict
Copyright battle with Marvin Gaye estate that began in 2013 draws to a close

Ben Beaumont-Thomas

13, Dec, 2018 @1:05 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Corbynomics: more creativity please | Editorial
Editorial: the Labour party should be congratulated for its progressive economic ideas. But as Tory MPs prepare to drop austerity and start spending, the opposition needs to be bolder

Editorial

27, May, 2018 @4:00 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Abba: still rocking the room 40 years on | Editorial
Editorial: They may not appear in person, but the Voyage concerts will return the 1970s superstars to their fans

Editorial

20, May, 2022 @5:00 PM