The Guardian view on a women’s health scandal: under the skin | Editorial

An official review of vaginal mesh and medicines in pregnancy reveals systemic weaknesses, and sexism too

Greater openness about women’s bodies was one of the big themes of postwar feminism. Access to contraception and the right to terminate a pregnancy were crucial stepping stones on a path to liberation from a social order that for centuries constrained women. The right to choose whether to have children is now well established, along with access to education, employment and equal pay (although gender pay and pension gaps remain). But sexism has not gone away. Among the findings of the Independent Medical Devices and Medicines Safety Review set up to investigate vaginal mesh implants is that the UK’s health system has a habit of ignoring women.

One patient likened the search for a doctor who would take seriously her concerns about the implants, which were widely used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence until 2018, to “traipsing through treacle”. A former doctor referred to an “unconscious negative bias” towards middle-aged women in chronic pain. The report described a culture in which “anything and everything” women said about their discomfort was put down to the menopause.

While three-quarters of all NHS staff are female, most senior doctors are male, including 73% of surgeons. As the review points out, some of its findings echo those of the inquiry into the jailed breast surgeon Ian Paterson. While the report says tens of thousands of women were harmed, poor data collection means a precise figure will never be known. The review, which was led by Julia Cumberlege, also examined the use of hormone pregnancy tests and the epilepsy medicine sodium valproate, which was prescribed in the UK for decades without adequate warnings of its known teratogenic (birth defect-causing) effects. Taken together, Lady Cumberlege’s recommendations amount to a significant tightening of health system processes, as well as a critique of its culture.

Loopholes in the testing of devices including mesh must now be closed, as part of the new framework on UK medicines regulation outside the EU. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency must take on a more proactive role. A “sunshine act” obliging doctors and pharmaceutical companies to declare payments is also overdue. There is a public interest in knowing where financial incentives exist (as they did in the 1990s when the Swedish doctor Ulf Ulmsten published influential research on vaginal mesh). The recommendation of a new patient safety commissioner should also be taken up unless there is some other way of bridging existing gaps. The creation of a new database of patients with mesh implants has started, and compensation must not become mired in delays.

Problems linked to surgical mesh are symptomatic of the wider neglect of reproductive health that has led to a lack of continuity, staff shortages and poor outcomes in maternity services. In future, multidisciplinary teams should be convened when treatment options include non-surgical options. Pelvic floor physiotherapy should be a routine postnatal option, as it is in France.

That health professionals and organisations must get better at listening is not a new idea. In recent years, patient groups and service users have played a key role in opening up discussions about health. In the midst of a pandemic and with the government planning a new NHS reorganisation, the families harmed by vaginal mesh or drugs taken in pregnancy years ago may not look like a priority to ministers. But the government and the health system owe it to the women who fought for this review to act on what it has found out.



The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on medical implants: patients need protecting | Editorial
Editorial: Our investigation has revealed alarming failures. Regulation of devices such as pacemakers and breast implants must be reformed


26, Nov, 2018 @5:33 PM

Article image
The gender pain gap is real. Doctors, stop dismissing women’s conditions | Dawn Foster
The medical profession needs to overcome biases in treating women, says Guardian columnist Dawn Foster

Dawn Foster

26, Nov, 2018 @6:18 PM

Article image
Pelvic mesh scandal is what happens when men with power ignore women | Richard Vize
Cumberlege report is a damning reminder of how arrogant, intimidating doctors have suppressed their patients’ views

Richard Vize

10, Jul, 2020 @7:33 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on NHS privatisation: the wrong treatment | Editorial
Editorial: The NHS is in crisis, and ministers are taking the opportunity to extend private healthcare’s reach


21, Jan, 2022 @5:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on vaginal mesh implants: trust data and patients | Editorial
Editorial: The devices have benefited a large number of women – but thousands have suffered serious adverse effects


16, Aug, 2017 @6:40 PM

Article image
The pelvic mesh scandal makes it clear: doctors must declare any funding | Margaret McCartney
We need a public register to show which doctors are in the pay of industry – or more patients will suffer, says author and broadcaster Margaret McCartney

Margaret McCartney

09, Jul, 2020 @12:56 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on a maternity care scandal: reform without delay | Editorial
Editorial: Once again, a report has laid bare shocking treatment of mothers and babies. Ministers and NHS bosses must now do what it says


11, Dec, 2020 @6:23 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on nurses: restoring grants is not enough | Editorial
Editorial: More support for trainees is a welcome step, but the reasons for the staffing crisis go deeper


27, Dec, 2019 @5:46 PM

Article image
The Handmaid’s Tale comes to life in Alabama. Women must heed the warning | Zoe Williams
The indictment of Marshae Jones for the manslaughter of her unborn child shows that misogyny is now state law, says Guardian columnist Zoe Williams

Zoe Williams

02, Jul, 2019 @5:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on GPs: ministers are playing a vicious game | Editorial
Editorial: Sajid Javid’s attempt to blame overstretched family doctors after four months in the job reveals a contempt for frontline services


14, Oct, 2021 @6:09 PM