No one job is worth saving at the expense of climate catastrophe. Not even Scott Morrison's | Richard Denniss

Promising Australia won’t tackle the climate crisis unless every coal worker’s job is safe is a cruel hoax designed to conceal inaction

Would the prime minister rule out protecting Australians from terrorism if it cost a single job? Would he promise that no nurse, teacher or other public servant would be sacked in pursuit of a budget surplus? Of course not. But when it comes to preventing dangerous climate change, the government whose policies closed the entire Australian car industry claims that every job is sacred. Yeah, right.

The one thing we can say with certainty about the coal industry is that, regardless of climate policy, automation will decimate coal communities in the coming decade. The coal companies sacked around half their workforce in the late 80s – the minute new technology let them – and the coal industry is gearing up to do it again. Adani promised its proposed Queensland coalmine would be automated “from pit to port” and the rest of the industry is publicly preparing for the same goal.

But while #ScottyFromMarketing loves to position himself as defending coal workers from climate activists, he is strategically silent when it comes to protecting those same coal workers from the ravages of automation. If the Coalition wanted to protect the jobs of those who currently work in the coal industry, they would ban the introduction of robot-driven trucks and trains in existing mines and ban the construction of new, highly automated mines in regions that have never mined coal. But they won’t, because supporting the coal industry has nothing to do with protecting the jobs of existing coal workers. Coal is about symbolism and the symbiotic relationship between the Coalition and the coal industry.

Fresh from doing nothing to prepare for the worst bushfires Australia has ever seen, Scott Morrison’s latest inactivity revolves around doing nothing to prevent our already changed climate from heatingup even more. Now that pretending there’s doubt about the science of climate change doesn’t cut it, our spin-doctor-in-chief has moved on to feigning concern with the economy as his latest excuse for climate inaction.

The prime minister is under mounting pressure to match the net-zero emission targets for 2050 that’s supported by all Australian states (including New South Wales, Tasmania and South Australia, with Liberal governments). And while he might not hold a hose when the bushfires are raging, there’s no doubt Morrison knows how to put a fire hose on his colleagues.

Step one is, of course, to shoot the messenger. While it’s usually scientists or environmentalists that cop abuse for speaking up against the federal government’s love affair with coal, Morrison didn’t miss a beat when he set out to mock and belittle the NSW environment minister, Matt Kean. Practice makes perfect.

Step two is to pull out the straw man. Shutting the coal industry down overnight would be reckless and cause lots of pain for no real gain. The fact that no one, ever, has called for the shutdown of the coal industry overnight makes it a particularly hard fight to lose. But it distracts journalists for just long enough to move things along to step 3. Econobabble.

If we know one thing about the economy it’s that it changes so frequently and so unexpectedly that it is literally impossible to predict. But even though no economist can accurately predict what the exchange rate or unemployment rate will be in three years’ time, Australian governments have become expert in worrying about what the economy will look like in 30 years’ time.

Protesters hold placards during a ‘Sack ScoMo!’ climate change rally in Sydney on 10 January 2020.
Protesters hold placards during a ‘Sack ScoMo!’ climate crisis rally in Sydney on 10 January 2020 as bushfires raged around Australia. Photograph: Paul Braven/AAP

It doesn’t matter whether it’s tax cuts, penalty rate cuts or climate policy. Australian politicians love to talk in detail about what the impact of their policies will be in 30 years’ time, rather than talk at all about the problems they are ignoring today. Peter Costello started it with his ridiculous fear campaign about “the costs of ageing”, but the Coalition, under Abbott and Morrison, plumbed new depths with their fear campaign aimed at anyone trying to save the planet.

Saying that you accept the science of climate change but think preventing it is a bit expensive is like saying you accept the science of immunisation but then decide to only inoculate one of your three kids.

Climate science told us long ago that our bushfires, hail storms, floods and cyclones were going to get a lot worse if we kept burning so much coal, oil and gas. Economics has told us all along that prevention is cheaper than cure, and that the removal of fossil fuel subsidies and the introduction of a carbon price would be good for the overall economy, good for the budget and good for the climate.

But just as we replaced real science with climate denial, we have replaced real economics with dodgy forecasts and bizarre criteria like protecting every coal job for the next 30 years.

Less than a year ago, Morrison promised the budget would be in surplus, wage growth would pick up and the economy would grow strongly. They were wrong about these things, not because they are stupid, but because no one knows what will happen to the economy in a year’s time – let alone in decades to come.

Which brings me back to that fire hose Morrison is trying to put on his Liberal colleagues who believe it makes more sense to try and prevent climate change than to use a term in government blaming others for it.

When pushed on setting more ambitious emission reduction target, Morrison mounted his high horse to declare: “What troubles me is that there are plenty of people at the moment who will go out and make a glib promise about that and they can’t look Australians in the eye and tell them what it will mean for their electricity prices, what it will mean for their jobs.”

Whether because of privatisation, outsourcing, offshoring, technological change, policy change or just plain bad luck, we should always be generous in helping people when they’re forced to make a new start.

But promising that our country won’t tackle climate change unless every single coal worker’s job is safe is not generous. It’s a cruel hoax designed to conceal climate inaction. No one job is worth saving at the expense of dangerous climate change. Not even Scott Morrison’s.

• Richard Denniss is chief economist at the Australia Institute

Contributor

Richard Denniss

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Most conservatives know prevention is better than cure – except when it comes to climate change | Richard Denniss
They’re usually more than happy to spend money upfront to avoid bigger costs down the track. Investing in renewable energy is the exception

Richard Denniss

08, Jan, 2020 @4:30 PM

Article image
Public support for new coalmines falls even among Coalition voters, ANU poll finds
Survey shows ‘significant and substantial’ decline in the popularity of Scott Morrison and the Coalition

Paul Karp

17, Feb, 2020 @4:30 PM

Article image
Prime minister, you need a credible climate policy. It's too dangerous to keep pretending you have one | Lenore Taylor
Scott Morrison’s press conference was just more talking points and spin. The country needs more than words

Lenore Taylor

21, Dec, 2019 @11:55 PM

Article image
As Barnaby Joyce unleashes a new strain of climate denial, can Labor plug the credibility gap? | Peter Lewis
While Morrison focuses on his noisy right flank, the ALP can establish its credentials as part of the global consensus

Peter Lewis

22, Jun, 2021 @1:55 AM

Article image
If the bushfires won't force climate policy change, we need to circumvent Scott Morrison | Lenore Taylor
The cabal of Coalition denialists calling the shots are still impervious to facts. But it’s not yet time to despair

Lenore Taylor

16, Jan, 2020 @8:51 PM

Article image
The megafires and pandemic expose the lies that frustrate action on climate change | Tim Flannery
If there was a moment of true emergency in the fight to preserve our climate, it is now

Tim Flannery

16, Sep, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
Scott Morrison is fighting the 2007 election again. It can only backfire | Greg Jericho
The PM’s suggestion Labor would change everything is a free ad for the opposition – because change is what voters want

Greg Jericho

01, Dec, 2018 @9:00 PM

Article image
Australia isn't doing its part for the global climate. Sooner or later we’ll have to pay our share | John Quiggin
But the cost of responding to climate change is trivial compared with the benefits

John Quiggin

27, May, 2019 @6:06 AM

Article image
Coal catastrophe: why Scott Morrison can't give in to Queensland triumphalism | Katharine Murphy
The government would be wrong to imagine all of Australia possesses the sensibilities of coal communities in Queensland

Katharine Murphy Political editor

22, May, 2019 @6:00 PM

Article image
As a Young Liberal I know it's time to stop turning climate change into a culture war | Chaneg Torres
The climate change debate in Australia has become a poisoned well, but it is our generation that will face the reality of it

Chaneg Torres

02, Jan, 2020 @4:03 AM