What Labour members really care about in this leadership race is ideas | Zoe Williams

The big distortion of this election is that it’s dominated by bitter infighting. It’s really a debate over differing visions of the future

Another lost election, another Labour leadership contest. And thanks to Ed Miliband’s contentious one-person-one-vote reforms, that inevitably puts the focus back on the party’s members. The most honest objection to the rules introduced under the reforms is that the right to choose the leader should never have been bestowed on the members. Not because they’re cranks or extremists, but because of the party’s composition – by definition, to have the surplus time and energy for monthly meetings and the annual conference puts you in a position of privilege. And this is borne out by the numbers: the majority of members are middle class, their average age 53. Why should that self-selecting band have rights in a two-party political system that others do not?

I think the counter-argument is stronger: that a functioning democracy needs levers of pluralism, identifiable mechanisms by which anyone can influence the makeup and decisions of its representatives. The alternative is the so-called professionalisation of politics, whereby a much smaller group simply determines what the country wants or needs with the help of polling, focus groups and things they hear on the buses they pretend to travel on. This is a clear and straightforward debate, and as such is usually shelved in favour of a series of caricatures.

Most commonly, the party is portrayed as having been taken over by a pincer movement of young extremists and the Trotskyist or Stalinist old guard (it is strange to have to look up, yet again, how you’re supposed to tell those apart). Shortly after Jeremy Corbyn’s victory in the 2016 challenge from Owen Smith, a “centrist” in my constituency Labour party described how the radicals who had been painstakingly rooted out in the 1980s had come back, like head lice – as if the hard left was always lying in wait for the host to be weakened.

Even if we accept that 1980s militants all saw their chance and came rushing back, this does not go any way towards explaining the extent of the support for Corbyn. For the interpretation to hold, the militants would have to have not only re-entered the party en masse, but instantly persuaded the so-called soft left to share their agenda.

In 2015 and again in 2016, Corbyn was the only left candidate on the slate. Members had taken their medicine, as they were routinely advised in the Miliband era: they accepted the idea that not opposing austerity, not attacking even corrupt businesses, not protecting public services, was the price of a fiscally responsible reputation, without which the party was sunk. The self-styled pragmatists had had their way, and sunk the ship anyway.

So when Corbyn stood against an array of status quo candidates – more of the same with extra heart (Yvette Cooper), more of the same with extra toughness (Liz Kendall), more of the same with longer eyelashes (Andy Burnham) – his victory should hardly have come as a surprise. A lot of the more lurid exaggerations about the changes to the party’s membership were really just cover for the embarrassment of those who had looked at a party with the same soft-left values it had always held, and failed to predict an entirely predictable thing.

Which brings us to Momentum, which is bedevilled by similar myth-making. At around 40,000 members, the group is just under a tenth the size of the overall party – but a tenth would be ample if it were the revolutionary sect, hellbent on getting rid of opponents, that it’s often portrayed as. There are certainly constituency parties where this picture is correct, where Momentum members did pore over the rule book trying to deselect their MP.

But there are also Momentum groups which are essentially Labour-plus, social and intellectual movements whose members run book groups and club nights as well as attending meetings. They cooperate perfectly well with the rest of the party, since their differences are of taste, not ideology. The idea that the party can’t take power again until these people are stamped out is simply fanciful. By what test would you eject them? “Your food bank fundraiser quiz night had too many questions on grime”?

The view that the party’s composition has to change before it can learn from its mistakes remains fairly niche. Instead, the distortions tend to act as signposts in the leadership contest, all pointing in wild directions: the claim that the members, defined by blind loyalty, will only accept the continuity candidate; or the members, guided by rigid principle, will only accept a woman; or they will only take a northerner. Not only are these precepts wrong, they are also boring, seeking to reduce to a flow chart of predetermined loyalties what is actually a contest of ideas.

The drive to portray Rebecca Long-Bailey as the candidate of the authentic left, and Jess Phillips as the true centre, is more about power blocs than politics – a move to retain power by the existing inner circle on one side, and retake it by the pragmatists of yesteryear on the other. But the other candidates (Keir Starmer, Clive Lewis, Emily Thornberry and Lisa Nandy) are all giving versions of modern leftwing analysis that are genuinely different, and have the potential to coexist and cross-pollinate – because they are about ideas, not control.

That’s the big distortion of this leadership election: the idea that it is dominated by bitter infighting and savage power play. In fact, having transparent debates about competing visions for the future, and then voting on them, is what keeps the party alive.

• Zoe Williams is a Guardian columnist


Zoe Williams

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on Labour’s leadership race: a long road back | Editorial
Editorial: After a catastrophic election, the party’s contest to replace Jeremy Corbyn must be conducted in a spirit of honesty and humility


06, Jan, 2020 @6:36 PM

Article image
Labour members want something new – not a return to 1997 | Owen Jones
All the candidates to succeed Jeremy Corbyn must show an inspiring alternative to Tory rule, says Guardian columnist Owen Jones

Owen Jones

08, Jan, 2020 @7:22 PM

Article image
It isn’t all about Rebecca Long-Bailey – Labour’s leadership contest is wide open | Sienna Rodgers
The MP for Salford and Eccles is assumed to be the frontrunner. But the Labour left could yet lose control of the leadership, says Sienna Rodgers, editor of LabourList

Sienna Rodgers

26, Dec, 2019 @12:00 PM

Article image
Labour leadership race: the declared, the likely and the maybes
After the party’s general election defeat, who will be the successor to Jeremy Corbyn?

Rajeev Syal

30, Dec, 2019 @6:03 PM

Article image
Labour leadership race: who's had a good week – and who hasn't
Sir Keir Starmer has consolidated his lead among MPs, while Emily Thornberry looks to be struggling

Rajeev Syal and Peter Walker

10, Jan, 2020 @4:01 PM

Article image
Labour leadership: where do the candidates stand?
As the race to replace Jeremy Corbyn gets under way, we look at the hopefuls’ positions from Brexit to the climate crisis

Rowena Mason Deputy political editor

07, Jan, 2020 @6:00 AM

Article image
How will the Labour leadership contest work?
The race to become party leader – and deputy – will begin this week, with new rules as well as new slogans

Heather Stewart Political editor

05, Jan, 2020 @4:42 PM

Article image
Labour leadership hopefuls make final pitches for support
Several contenders still short of 22 backers needed to go to next round as deadline nears

Kate Proctor

12, Jan, 2020 @7:49 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on electoral reform: an argument Labour needs to have | Editorial
Editorial: Whichever candidates get through the current stage of the leadership race, proportional representation must be among the ideas they take with them


12, Jan, 2020 @6:50 PM

Article image
Labour leadership contest: who's in and who could join them?
Keir Starmer and Rebecca Long-Bailey are the favourites to succeed Jeremy Corbyn

Kate Proctor Political correspondent

23, Dec, 2019 @6:21 PM