Term is starting – and English schools must tackle their arts emergency | Michael Rosen

The popularity of subjects such as English literature has fallen dramatically. As a new school year begins, it’s time for a rethink

A new school year is about to begin. This means that I might soon arrive at a school and do a poetry workshop with some younger teenagers. It could well go like this. They make it clear that they don’t like poetry. I tell them poetry comes in hundreds of different shapes, sizes, rhythms and moods; one way we can make poems is in a group and without writing anything down. For example, the people who are in charge of us in life have ways of showing they are fed up with us, angry with us, or through which they try to control us; punish us, even. What do such people say? I suggest they go into pairs and say these kinds of things to each other – in role, as parents, teachers, carers. We select the best lines. Then I say, can we create this into a scene? They suggest that all the lines should be said to just one of them sitting in a chair; the rest stand in a semicircle around him, and as they each say their line they point at the boy in the chair and then step back, while the semicircle repeats a chosen chorus.

We have made a snapshot of one aspect of their lives. It has rhythm, structure, solo and chorus, movement and mimesis. Later they can perform it for others, write a transcript of it and “publish” it on a school blog. We can talk about what we have made: what worked? Was it like any other poems or plays?

This is the arts in action. There should be a place for it in all schools, but it is becoming desperately difficult to find the time, staffing or resources to make it happen.

Why? Because school means choices, and there are competing ideas about what school is for. The position firmly in place now in England, thanks largely to the influence of Michael Gove during his time as education secretary, is that our schools should focus their attention on producing units of sellable labour power (school leavers), and these units should be seen as being more or less able to compete in what ministers call the global labour market; there is an agreed amount of knowledge that needs to be transferred from teachers to pupils so that they can become these competitive units. Capacity to compete has to be measured by putting in place tests at key moments throughout a person’s school life so that by the end, school will disgorge a graded set of units – some of whom have this knowledge, and about a third of whom do not.

One of the saddest consequences of this narrow approach to education is a decline in school students doing subjects with an arts dimension. (I hesitate to use the word “creative” because in ideal circumstances any subject can be creative.) This year, 3,500 fewer students sat English literature A-level compared to last year; over the past four years, music GCSE takeup has fallen by 17% and there has been a sharp drop in takeup of drama courses. One reason for this is that schools are judged on their success in getting students to achieve success at Ebacc – a raft of five GCSEs, which exclude arts subjects – and all subjects have been overloaded with requirements to memorise more. In English literature this has led to a demand that all students learn quotes and chunks of contextual knowledge. Well, say cynics like me, it makes it easier for examiners to find the requisite number of failures: the ones who can’t reproduce this stuff on the day. It also guarantees humiliation.

Students sit a GCSE exam
‘Schools are judged on their success in getting students to achieve success at Ebacc.’ Students sit a GCSE exam. Photograph: David Jones/PA

There is another way. The world is becoming increasingly changeable and unpredictable, so why should education make the knowledge being passed on so finite and certain; why divide all of it into measurable units? And why ask education to jump to the economic system’s demands and solve its woes? Doesn’t the new world of climate change, automation, fake news and global digital communication make it necessary for young people to be more flexible, interpretive, critical and creative? Why has so much been added to the curriculum, with the consequence that the GCSE course in many schools has lengthened to three years plus much more homework, reducing time for the arts and cutting down on scope for teachers to devise courses and materials away from what’s required in national exams? There should be room in education for schooling to be more responsive to events, more focused on varying interpretations and more able to create artistic and technological responses to the world as it changes. There should be more time both in and outside of lessons for students to follow personal and cultural interests.

All this requires the delivery of knowledge – plenty of it – but in ways that ask students to do things with that knowledge rather than to just absorb it. Some of this knowledge may be difficult or even impossible to measure, but so be it.

The arts investigate the properties of the world by playing with materials – such as stone, paint, fabric, synthetic substances, the human body, the human voice and of course language. They investigate the mind’s responses to the material world and to other people, past and present, and to how we organise ourselves into societies, institutions and groups. The arts always involve change and transformation. In the process of making something – a dance, a film, a song, a textile design, whatever – we change “stuff” in order to create something new. In changing stuff, we change ourselves.

This is fun. It’s absorbing. It’s emotional. It touches us and moves us. It’s social: in doing the arts we find out what we need from each other. But it’s also about survival – surviving as individuals, as groups, but also as the human race. It may not be a sufficient means to keep barbarism and despoliation of the planet at bay, but I believe it is a necessary condition for this, because the arts keep coming back to the question: what is the “us-ness” of us? It’s about time the arts had a guaranteed place in schools and the way they enhance students’ lives was properly recognised.

• Michael Rosen is a writer and broadcaster, and a former children’s laureate


Michael Rosen

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The arts teach us how to express ourselves – and give us freedom to fail | Daisy Buchanan
As music and languages are cut, students no longer engage in subjects that aren’t all about right and wrong, says writer Daisy Buchanan

Daisy Buchanan

16, Aug, 2018 @8:00 AM

Article image
Creativity can be taught to anyone. So why are we leaving it to private schools? | Rufus Norris
The UK’s creative industries are world leading. Excluding state-educated people from the arts will throw that excellence away, warns the director of the National Theatre

Rufus Norris

17, Jan, 2018 @6:00 AM

Article image
Why are children forced to choose between the arts? The Ebacc must go | Bob and Roberta Smith
Children should be allowed to study the GCSE subjects that interest them, says artist Bob and Roberta Smith

Bob and Roberta Smith

22, Aug, 2019 @1:30 PM

Article image
‘Creativity crisis’ looms for English schools due to arts cuts, says Labour
Number of GCSE music and drama students fell by a fifth over last decade, research finds

Sally Weale

15, Jul, 2021 @9:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on arts education: a creativity crisis | Editorial
Editorial: The government’s bleakly utilitarian education policies risk restricting the arts to a privileged few. It’s time for a change


07, Feb, 2023 @6:52 PM

Article image
I know how hard it is for working-class actors to succeed. We can change that | Eddie Marsan
Money is a huge obstacle for people trying to get into the arts. We need positive policies – even quotas – to improve diversity, writes the actor Eddie Marsan

Eddie Marsan

14, Aug, 2018 @1:11 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on creativity in schools: a missing ingredient | Editorial
Editorial: Imagination should infuse teaching of science as well as the arts. Children are not pitchers to be filled with facts


18, Oct, 2019 @5:25 PM

Article image
It's clear this government doesn't value the arts in schools | Dreda Say Mitchell
Dreda Say Mitchell: Creativity has a role in society that's more important than merely turning a dollar – and perhaps that's why Gove et al don't back it

Dreda Say Mitchell

21, Apr, 2014 @3:14 PM

Article image
English schools are broken. Only radical action will fix them | Melissa Benn
From failed free schools to poor funding and inequality, education needs drastic reform to create a fairer model, says author Melissa Benn

Melissa Benn

09, Aug, 2018 @5:00 AM

Article image
How league tables stymie arts in schools | Letters
Letters: Michael Gove’s wheeze of an English baccalaureate had the effect of relegating subjects like drama, dance, art and design to also-rans

20, Feb, 2015 @5:30 PM