The Guardian view on extraditing Julian Assange: don’t do it | Editorial

The US case against the WikiLeaks founder is an assault on press freedom and the public’s right to know

Sweden’s decision to drop an investigation into a rape allegation against Julian Assange has both illuminated the situation of the WikiLeaks founder and made it more pressing. He must be defended against extradition to the United States in a case that digs at the foundations of freedom and democracy in both Britain and the US, and could see him sentenced to a total of 175 years.

Mr Assange is in Belmarsh prison, where he served a 50-week sentence for skipping bail. He had entered the Ecuadorian embassy in London to avoid arrest when Sweden asked Britain to extradite him for questioning. Though he denies any wrongdoing, that investigation was appropriate. Prosecuting authorities have said the complainant’s evidence was credible and reliable, but that the passage of time – Mr Assange entered the embassy in 2012 – meant that witnesses’ memories had faded.

The path has now been cleared for the US charges against him. They are entirely different. They relate to the secret military and diplomatic files provided by Chelsea Manning, which exposed appalling abuses by the US, and corrupt and brutal behaviour by other governments. These were covered by the Guardian, the New York Times and others, providing the public with important and necessary information. The Guardian, like others, strongly opposed Mr Assange’s subsequent decision to publish unredacted documents in bulk. But the material’s importance remains indisputable.

The Obama administration decided against pursuing Mr Assange under the Espionage Act, realising the threat to first amendment rights. Donald Trump enthused about his organisation on the 2016 campaign trail: “I love WikiLeaks,” he announced, after it published Democratic party emails stolen by Russian state hackers. But his administration has chosen to prosecute Mr Assange, and to do so explicitly on charges of publishing classified information through WikiLeaks.

Press freedom advocates in the US have rightly described this decision as “terrifying” and a “dire threat” to reporters, particularly given Mr Trump’s relentless assaults upon the media. But Sajid Javid, then home secretary, signed the extradition order and the matter is with the courts. The full proceedings will begin in February.

The case against extradition is strengthened by the nature of the US penal system – particularly given concerns about Mr Assange’s health – and the shameful treatment of Ms Manning. The army whistleblower was held in solitary confinement for years. Though her sentence was commuted by Barack Obama, she has been jailed again, for refusing to cooperate with a grand jury assumed to relate to Mr Assange’s case.

This is not a question of how wise Mr Assange is, still less how likable. It is not about his character, nor his judgment. It is a matter of press freedom, and the public’s right to know. It is unclear whether it would be safe to extradite Mr Assange to the US. It is certain that it would not be right.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on Julian Assange: send him to Sweden | Editorial
Editorial: The founder of WikiLeaks faces charges of espionage in the US and rape in Sweden. He should stand trial for rape

Editorial

24, May, 2019 @4:50 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Julian Assange: it would be wrong to extradite him | Editorial
Editorial: The WikiLeaks founder has been in Ecuador’s embassy in London since 2012. Clear judgment will be required if he now leaves his self-imposed retreat

Editorial

09, Apr, 2019 @5:25 PM

Article image
Whatever you think of Julian Assange, his extradition to the US must be opposed | Owen Jones
Extraditing the founder of WikiLeaks is an attempt by the US to intimidate anyone who exposes its crimes, says Guardian columnist Owen Jones

Owen Jones

12, Apr, 2019 @11:49 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on Julian Assange’s extradition: a bad day for journalism | Editorial
Editorial: Priti Patel could have turned down the American request. By not doing so she dealt a blow to press freedom

Editorial

17, Jun, 2022 @4:34 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Julian Assange: no victim of arbitrary detention | Editorial
Editorial: WikiLeaks made its name by exposing those who ignored the rule of law. Its editor-in-chief should recognise that applies to him as well as the US government

Editorial

04, Feb, 2016 @7:19 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Julian Assange's extradition ruling: relief, not victory | Editorial
Editorial: A judge has rightly rejected the US request, but only on mental health grounds. The case should be dropped

Editorial

05, Jan, 2021 @7:24 PM

Article image
Fearful of what might await Julian Assange in the US | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to news that the WikiLeaks founder faces extradition to the US after being dragged from the Ecuadorian embassy in London

Letters

12, Apr, 2019 @4:25 PM

Article image
Julian Assange case is the Dreyfus of our age, says John McDonnell
Shadow chancellor compares US extradition case to 19th-century treason trial

Ben Quinn

20, Feb, 2020 @2:54 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Julian Assange: why he should not be extradited | Editorial
Editorial: Sending him to be tried in the United States would be an unacceptable act against the WikiLeaks founder – and against journalism

Editorial

18, Feb, 2024 @6:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on media freedom: it must be defended | Editorial
Editorial: Killed, jailed and bullied, journalists are under growing pressure worldwide. Brave individuals such as Maria Ressa in the Philippines need our support

Editorial

13, Feb, 2019 @6:25 PM