The Guardian view on the floods: global heating and British soaking | Editorial

The drama and loss of recent days should focus minds on the urgent necessity of climate adaptation

The death of Annie Hall, the former high sheriff of Derbyshire who was swept away by floodwater last Friday in Darley Dale near Matlock, was the saddest and most shocking consequence so far of the destruction wreaked across northern parts of England over the past week. While cameras in recent days have been trained on and around Doncaster, where dramatic pictures from the village of Fishlake and suburb of Bentley showed people being towed along red-brick residential streets in inflatable boats – and where the Liberal Democrat leader, Jo Swinson, paid a visit – the affected area stretches south along the course of the river Don through Rotherham and Sheffield, and on to Lincolnshire and Derbyshire, where the river Derwent burst its banks last week.

Road closures, buildings underwater so that residents who have chosen to stay are stuck upstairs, thousands more homes evacuated while gardens are turned into lakes, transport chaos (Rotherham’s railway station, for example, currently resembles a canal), volunteers ferrying neighbours and journalists around, police standing guard to ward off looters – the chaos creates a kind of spectacle while it lasts, and opportunities for generosity as well as danger. But one resident, Sue Marshall, surely spoke for many when she said that she feared becoming old news very fast. “What we need to know is that in two months’ time, the MPs will look at what has been done to stop it happening again.”

It is in the nature of an election campaign that politicians seek to capitalise on events such as the past week’s record-breaking rainfall (114mm fell in Derbyshire in 24 hours – more than a normal month’s total) to expose their opponents’ weaknesses. Boris Johnson’s decision to convene a Cobra meeting on Tuesday came after the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, suggested that floods in Surrey would have been more likely to prompt the declaration of a national emergency. But while the reaction of Doncaster council has been criticised by residents – health and safety concerns having prevented officials from joining rescue efforts – and local flood defence schemes, as well as land use and planning decisions, will rightly be scrutinised once the waters have retreated, there is no suggestion that government agencies or the emergency services failed to respond appropriately.

Spending on flood defences was cut by David Cameron, despite research showing that increased flooding is the greatest threat to the UK from global heating. In 2013 the number of officials working on national adaptation was cut from 38 to six. Since then, climate scientists’ predictions appear to have come true with the frequency of floods increasing, and the two wettest winters on record in 2013-14 and 2015-16. Funding has again been increased, and natural flood prevention schemes such as tree planting and moorland restoration are being tried – although not yet on the scale that will be needed if future disasters are to be averted.

Those residents who have seen homes and possessions destroyed, particularly those who lack insurance, deserve sympathy and assistance. But, as with the catastrophic fires currently raging in Australia, the only rational response to these floods is to redouble every effort to treat increasing climate chaos as the global emergency it is.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on local elections: national lessons for Brexit | Editorial
Editorial: The failure of Britain’s gridlocked politics has found expression in the rise of smaller parties and large swathes of the country where no one party can run local governments. This will further disrupt our broken politics

Editorial

03, May, 2019 @5:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on flooded Britain: breaking the waves | Editorial
Editorial: The mitigation measures promoted by ministers are important, but a new focus on climate and energy policies is needed

Editorial

17, Feb, 2020 @6:56 PM

Article image
The Guardian view of Boris Johnson: neglecting the nation | Editorial
Editorial: He ignores the floods while pursuing immigration plans and an attack on the BBC, which are destructive and divisive. The prime minister does not care

Editorial

21, Feb, 2020 @6:09 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the 2019 election result: a new political landscape | Editorial
Editorial: Boris Johnson has redrawn the map and Labour and the Lib Dems are in disarray. Brexit will pass and Scottish independence will move to the centre of the stage

Editorial

13, Dec, 2019 @5:32 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the IPCC climate report: the fierce urgency of now | Editorial
Editorial: The world’s political leaders must heed the dramatic warning that climate scientists have delivered

Editorial

09, Aug, 2021 @6:03 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on buses: power to the passengers | Editorial
Editorial: Ever since they were deregulated, profits have come first. Manchester mayor Andy Burnham must now push back

Editorial

20, Jun, 2019 @5:43 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on record-breaking weather: the heat is on | Editorial
Editorial: What better time than the UK’s hottest-ever week for ministers to commit to bold climate action?

Editorial

14, Aug, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the 2018 local elections: speaking for England? | Editorial
Editorial: Voters across England go to the polls on 3 May. But there are many Englands and many voices

Editorial

02, Apr, 2018 @5:06 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on adapting to global heating: risks must be faced | Editorial
Editorial: Investment in flood defences is overdue. But progress on climate resilience requires confronting vested interests too

Editorial

01, Aug, 2021 @5:25 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on local elections: good reasons to give May a bad night | Editorial
Editorial: Austerity, the Windrush scandal and Brexit have underscored this government’s callousness, incompetence and poor judgment. Voters must not assist Theresa May on her damaging course

Editorial

29, Apr, 2018 @4:59 PM