The Guardian view on moon landings: a new race for space | Editorial

The Apollo 11 mission inspired the world. What has happened in the ensuing half-century?

When Neil Armstrong stepped on to the moon 50 years ago, it was down to a giant leap of political and scientific imagination. His footprints on the powdery lunar surface changed the way we saw ourselves, confirming that humanity could escape its earthly coils. The mission unleashed a dream of what we as a species might do. Yet only a dozen people have walked on the moon, all between the summer of 1969 and the end of 1972.

Did we lose our primordial urge to explore? Almost certainly not – though Buzz Aldrin this week decried “50 years of non-progress”, probes have travelled to Pluto and beyond. But times have changed. The cold war rivalry that catalysed the space race vanished. The Soviet Union was first with a satellite, dog and astronaut in space. Today Washington and Moscow play the great game in the Middle East, not the heavens, although both are now contemplating a return to the moon: Donald Trump wants to make America great again by putting astronauts there by 2024, though some think China may get there first; Russia talks of landing cosmonauts by 2030.

Then there’s the money. By 1966 the United States was spending 4.4% of the national budget on Nasa. Now the US cash for space barely touches 0.5% of GDP. More striking is that space is increasingly a playground for rich men. There is a risk that, thanks to Elon Musk and Richard Branson, manned space flight degenerates into conspicuous consumption for the super-rich. The world’s wealthiest man, Jeff Bezos, also dreams of going to the moon, this time to stay and turn it into an industrial park. This is not as silly as it sounds: helium-3, which could be a plentiful source of energy, could be mined there. Sceptics might say that before Mr Bezos carves up the moon he should sort out the business model of the corporation that pays for his plans, but the next giant leaps may well come from entrepreneurs, not states.

If Armstrong’s stroll produced the greatest broadcast in television history, then another astronaut produced the most significant image. The picture of the Earth rising above the moon’s horizon was pivotal for environmentalism, since it induced the sense that our home planet was something to be cared for rather than plundered. Underlying the idea of living on another planet is that we might need to if we continue making a mess of the one we have.

However, the treaty that governs who can do what is even older than Armstrong’s steps on the moon. Private firms and smaller nations have joined the race for the stars. Luxembourg is positioning itself to be the centre of the space business. This will need careful handling.

Space isn’t what it used to be. But one image of what happened on the way to the moon in 1969 needs challenging. In celebrating the lunar landing, let’s remember that it wasn’t only buzz-cut white men who had the right stuff: behind the scenes were female mathematicians, several of them African-American, tasked with plotting the route to the moon. Without them, Mr Armstrong would never have got there.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on exploring Saturn: an inspiring distraction | Editorial
Editorial: The great success of the Cassini mission deserves our appreciation, but Nasa’s work on Earth’s climate matters more

Editorial

11, Sep, 2017 @6:44 PM

Article image
The space race is back on – and is China in the lead? | Mary Dejevsky
With its Chang’e 4 landing, China has eclipsed US and Russian achievements. Expect them to take fresh interest in the moon, says Mary Dejevsky, a former foreign correspondent

Mary Dejevsky

03, Jan, 2019 @11:51 AM

Article image
The space race is back on – but who will win?
Alliances are shifting as states led by China and Russia compete with the US and tech entrepreneurs

Luke Harding

16, Jul, 2021 @9:39 AM

Article image
Moon landing in 1969 was one small step for scrapbooking kids | Brief letters
Brief letters: Neil Armstrong | KLM | Boris Johnson | Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump | Phoebe Waller-Bridge | Ed Sheeran

Letters

19, Jul, 2019 @4:21 PM

Article image
In space, no one will hear Bezos and Musk’s workers call for basic rights | Robert Reich
The bosses of Tesla and Amazon want to take humans to Mars and beyond – but won’t show basic humanity on Earth

Robert Reich

25, Apr, 2021 @5:00 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on spaceflight: the outward urge
Editorial: Missions like Nasa’s flyby of Ultima Thule, and China’s to place a lander on the far side of the moon, are more than a triumph of technology

Editorial

02, Jan, 2019 @6:26 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Venezuela: its people deserve better | Editorial
Editorial: Nicolás Maduro has failed his country. Now the US response has raised the stakes

Editorial

24, Jan, 2019 @6:44 PM

Article image
Enjoy the blood moon while you can. Donald Trump has plans for it | Philip Ball
While letting other space science wither, the US president is keen to open up a new American frontier on the moon, says science writer Philip Ball

Philip Ball

27, Jul, 2018 @10:55 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on Trump and arms: can the doomsday clock be stopped? | Editorial
Editorial: The threat of an arms race is real and growing. The news of recent days has highlighted the dangers

Editorial

20, Jan, 2019 @6:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on James Mattis’s resignation: a bad day for America | Editorial
Editorial: The US defence secretary was a voice of reason in the White House, which is left to pursue a self-defeating policy that benefits the nation’s foes while abandoning its friends

Editorial

21, Dec, 2018 @6:25 PM