Cut tuition fees and you shut the door to poor students | Anne-Marie Canning

Universities rely on income from fees to fund the outreach activities essential to make them more diverse

Last week, universities in England were preparing reports on how they have diversified their student populations. These reports will be submitted to the director of fair access at the Office for Students. My university, King’s College London, will report, happily, that our undergraduate intake is now 77% state school, more than 52% ethnic minority and has the fastest growing population of low-income students in the Russell Group.

And what has made all this progress and vital work possible? The very thing that many believe to be the enemy of educational opportunity – tuition fees.

When, in 2012, the coalition government introduced the then £9,000 fee regime, what’s little known is that it came with serious regulatory machinery to secure gains in access and participation. As a result, higher tuition fees have leveraged £800m into schemes and bursaries for poorer students.

The system, then, acts in a redistributive way. Alongside the poorest, its beneficiaries include refugees, forced migrants, care leavers and “estranged students” (those not supported by their parents). Thanks to the tuition fee regime, programmes designed to widen intake are now delivered at every single university. Education centres, homework clubs, tutoring by PhD students, summer schools and teacher training events are just some of the initiatives under way across the country.

It’s a shame that this work does not feature more in the debates the Augar review of post-18 education funding in England.

The 2016 Labour party manifesto proposed the abolition of tuition fees, while there are suggestions that the Augar review will recommend a significant reduction. Both proposals endanger vital widening participation resources and infrastructure. In fact, without compensatory safeguards, universities will have to dismantle programmes and initiatives, and dismiss staff who support students to fulfil their ambitions. The loss will be massive and will hurt a generation of young people and their communities.

In the past few decades, there has been a transformation in who gets to become a graduate. Now, more than one in three 18-year-olds are studying in higher education. Entry rates have increased in 95% of parliamentary constituencies since 2006. And perhaps, most hearteningly, in 2017 English pupils receiving free school meals were 83% more likely to go to university than they were in 2006.

However, this picture does vary by region. While in 2017 41.8% of 18-year-olds in London went to university, only 28.9% of the same population in the south-west and 30.3% in the north-east did. In terms of undergraduates from black and minority ethnic groups, the numbers rose by 38% between 2007-08 and 2015-16.

While widening participation is concerned with all university attendees, the fair access debate focuses on who gets to study at the most selective institutions. Here, progress has been much slower. Access to Oxbridge, for instance, is moving at glacial speed, though there are green shoots, with programmes such as the Lady Margaret Hall foundation year and University College Oxford’s Opportunity Programme showing some lateral thinking. Change must come at these universities – and others not performing well that still seem to avoid the glare of press scrutiny.

But if you abolish tuition fees you also abolish the cash that provides the means to support low-income and underrepresented students. And there is scant evidence that higher fees have deterred less-advantaged young people.

There are less drastic changes that would help. These include a recasting of the current regime as a graduate tax to relieve the sense of debt burden, a grace period on interest rates while studying and a block on early repayment. Most fundamentally, a reintroduction of maintenance grants to the poorest learners gives a powerful message that the government wants these students to go to university and significantly reduces the strain of their living costs.

When the fruits of higher education are fairly distributed, I will be happy to see a free system. Until that day, tuition fees are a smart and socially just way to ensure the widest range of students.

Anne-Marie Canning is director of social mobility and student success at King’s College London


Anne-Marie Canning

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Cutting tuition fees won’t help poorer students – reduce interest rates instead | David Blunkett
The government’s university funding review must think again about interest rates, says former education secretary David Blunkett

David Blunkett

18, Jan, 2019 @2:02 PM

Article image
The Observer view on a graduate tax being the fairest way to pay for university | Observer editorial
The proposed multi-tier system of tuition fees would result in poorer students being deterred from the sciences

Observer editorial

06, Jan, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
Social mobility tsar warns cuts to tuition fees may not help poorest students
Martina Milburn says her commission will look at reviving maintenance grants

Michael Savage

09, Dec, 2018 @8:00 AM

Article image
Oxbridge bashing is an empty ritual if we ignore wider social inequities | Priyamvada Gopal
David Lammy is right to attack the lack of diversity at elite bodies, but the problems are far more deep seated

Priyamvada Gopal

21, Oct, 2017 @11:04 PM

Article image
‘For the few, not the many’ still drives Scotland’s schools system | Kevin McKenna
Performance data reveals how much the country still suffers from educational gerrymandering

Kevin McKenna

24, Mar, 2019 @5:59 AM

Article image
US entrepreneur sets up Oxford scholarship for black UK students
Arlan Hamilton grant to cover costs for undergraduates from disadvantaged backgrounds

Richard Adams Education editor

03, Dec, 2019 @7:16 PM

Tuition fees: Don't price out the poor from university | Observer leader

Observer leader: The Tories have no problems with tuition fees. Many Lib Dems are opposed. Both will await Lord Browne's report with interest

Observer editorial

11, Sep, 2010 @11:06 PM

Article image
The tuition fees generation is finding its voice in parliament | Gaby Hinsliff
Westminster’s newest recruits are now in a position to challenge older MPs who benefited from a free education, says Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff

Gaby Hinsliff

23, Jan, 2020 @7:07 PM

Article image
Tuition fees should reflect the real cost of each degree course: The big issue
Students deserve to see itemised bills from universities

15, Jul, 2017 @11:05 PM

Article image
Oxbridge only has itself to blame for its lack of diversity | The big issue
Academics deflect from their establishments’ deficiencies by saying society is at fault

28, Oct, 2017 @11:05 PM