Cutting tuition fees won’t help poorer students – reduce interest rates instead | David Blunkett

The government’s university funding review must not cut fees – that would damage teaching and help only richer students

• David Blunkett is a former education secretary

Recent research has shown that higher education students from wealthier families are paying off tuition fees in England upfront, in order to avoid debts and “sky-high” interest rates. The findings, from the Intergenerational Foundation, showed that the “bank of mum and dad” was once again intervening in a world of deep inequality and unfairness.

The thinktank called for changes to the current fees system – however, this is unlikely to benefit those being disadvantaged by it.

After the 2017 general election, the government launched a review, led by Philip Augar, into the future funding of higher education. This was initiated in part because the Conservatives feared that their poor performance among young people was due to Labour’s promise to abolish tuition fees (though, in fact, the Tories did no better among young voters not in higher education).

The review was given a frankly impossible task: find solutions that would be attractive to existing and future students – without incurring any extra government expenditure.

Leaks from the review suggest that Augar will recommend a cut in the current annual fee of £9,250 for domestic students attending university in England. Estimates have put the cost of such a cut at about £3bn – if true, the impact on teaching would be devastating.

Meanwhile, the government has established the teaching excellence framework – its overarching intention to improve the quality of teaching and emphasise student experience at university and their employability. You couldn’t ask for a more contradictory set of policies. Paradoxically, the result will be to reassert the primacy of research over teaching.

If half of those taking out student loans won’t ever fully repay, then reducing the size of the loans will only benefit those who would have paid off the money in full by the end of the 30-year cut off period – that is, the future higher earners, and so it is of no benefit to those who most need it.

Once a cut is made in tuition fees, universities will get substantially less money for teaching; and lower earners gain nothing as they continue to pay at the existing 9% of their income for the foreseeable future. Disillusionment sets in all round.

However, a reduction of the 6.3% interest payments on these loans would not only be beneficial for those repaying – but it would also increase the likelihood of the total amount being repaid over time.

Simply cutting the tuition fee would not help the bulk of poorer and medium-income students in later years, while it would simultaneously damage the quality of our university system.

Some blithely suggest that many courses should simply go to the wall. This is often the line of those who benefited from good quality higher education – as they expect their children to. Yet the so-called “Mickey Mouse” courses, as described by those with an elitist tendency, would not be the ones to go, as they are often the cheapest to deliver: they also tend to cross-subsidise the more expensive academic and vocational options.

So, I say to Philip Augur, before he releases his recommendations, please, unless you have a cast-iron Treasury guarantee of new money, don’t reduce fees yet. Otherwise you will manage the trick of helping very few, while damaging the interests of everyone.

• David Blunkett is former secretary of state for education and employment, professor of politics in practice, University of Sheffield, and chair of the University of Law


David Blunkett

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Cutting tuition fees will turn universities into vassals of the state | Simon Jenkins
The tuition fees scheme has failed to balance universities’ books, says Guardian columnist Simon Jenkins

Simon Jenkins

10, Jan, 2019 @6:55 PM

Article image
The tuition fees generation is finding its voice in parliament | Gaby Hinsliff
Westminster’s newest recruits are now in a position to challenge older MPs who benefited from a free education, says Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff

Gaby Hinsliff

23, Jan, 2020 @7:07 PM

Article image
£100m for Cambridge? Give it to universities that need the money | Marthe de Ferrer
Benefactors such as David Harding put their alma maters first – but their gifts could be transformational elsewhere, says journalist and school governor Marthe de Ferrer

Marthe de Ferrer

06, Feb, 2019 @2:50 PM

Article image
England lacks white working-class graduates. Quick fixes won’t change that | Phil McDuff
Just trying to boost numbers of students from poorer white backgrounds isn’t enough, says social policy writer Phil McDuff

Phil McDuff

18, Feb, 2019 @9:00 AM

Article image
We can’t let poorer pupils be frightened off higher education | Claire Hynes
University offers tremendous benefits, to the individual and for society. It must not be only for the privileged, says Claire Hynes who teaches at the University of East Anglia

Claire Hynes

09, Nov, 2018 @2:47 PM

Article image
Universities have driven their workers into the ground. That’s why I’m striking | Amelia Horgan
Universities have prioritised profit over and students the welfare of their staff. Enough is enough, says Amelia Horgan of the University of Essex

Amelia Horgan

28, Nov, 2019 @4:28 PM

Article image
University tuition fees hike 'will deter most poorer students' – poll

Ipsos Mori poll finds proposed increase in course costs would cut student applicants from disadvantaged families by two-thirds

Rachel Williams and Jeevan Vasagar

18, Nov, 2010 @12:01 AM

Article image
A bankrupt university was inevitable once market forces took hold | Anne Perkins
Demand is down, supply is up – something had to give and now universities are on the brink. It’s all so avoidable, says Anne Perkins

Anne Perkins

02, Nov, 2018 @9:42 AM

Article image
Cut tuition fees and you shut the door to poor students | Anne-Marie Canning
Universities rely on income from fees to fund the outreach activities essential to make them more diverse

Anne-Marie Canning

20, Jan, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
Fines for partying won’t make students better neighbours | Coco Khan
Learning to socialise is an important aspect of university life, says Guardian columnist Coco Khan

Coco Khan

08, Nov, 2018 @8:00 AM