The Lib Dems need to get back to what they do best: making parliament work | Jonathan Parry

An overly ideological stance led to a poor election result, but the party can now use its bloc of seats to check abuses of power

What are the Liberal Democrats for? The 2010s gave them two big opportunities to challenge Tory-Labour political dominance – the coalition and the chaos of the last three years. This year they might have turned the defection of MPs from other parties to their advantage and reinvented themselves as a new force. Both crises have instead weakened them and left politics more polarised than ever.

The two-party system has emasculated the Lib Dems. In 2015 the close Cameron-Clegg coalition relationship led to the loss of dozens of seats, as left-of-centre voters blamed them for austerity and tuition fees, while the failure of the 2011 referendum closed the door on proportional representation for a generation. In 2019 they were squeezed between the pillars of “getting Brexit done” and Corbynism. They forced the election, hoping to benefit from Jeremy Corbyn’s unpopularity; they helped the Tory press to attack him, pretending that he was a sinister threat even though he could never have won the complete power needed to unleash his radicalism.

Instead of boasting that she could be prime minister, Jo Swinson should have promised that her MPs would neutralise Corbyn by scrutinising the incoherent, overambitious Labour manifesto and making something of the good parts. The party should have challenged the view that the last parliament was “broken”. It should have defended its slow, painful strategy of examining and moderating Brexit. It should have sold the achievements of the coalition more aggressively – including tuition fees – in comparison with the Conservatives’ policies since 2015.

The Lib Dems must now use their bloc of seats to make parliament work better. And they need to sell the benefits of parliamentary give-and-take. For the foreseeable future they will be fighting not to form a government but to influence a hung parliament – which will be a possibility at every election, as long as the SNP remains strong.

Liberal politics has always been about using the House of Commons to check abuses of power. The original function of the Liberal parliamentary party was to challenge the feudal, boorish rule of the crown, the church, and British and Irish landlordism. After 1945 it positioned itself against the two new overmighty powers: big business and bullying unions. Liberalism has worked best – as for most of the 19th century – when it grafted to assemble parliamentary majorities for compromise reforms, helped (but usually not overawed) by public pressure.

Lib Dems sometimes misunderstand this history. They have too reverential a view of their biggest heroes, William Gladstone and David Lloyd George. Both had their moments: they produced inspiring moral campaigns in opposition, and landmark economic and social measures in government. But each man turned the Liberal party into his personal plaything through egotism and executive arrogance, ruining its chances of an electoral majority for decades to come.

In the mid-20th century the party was kept alive only by the Celtic fringe: the west country, rural Wales and the Scottish highlands. That was not just a geographical peculiarity. It reflected those regions’ longstanding dissenting pride in the individual conscience, and suspicion of an illiberal, amoral state operating from London. Outside Scotland the party has now lost all those seats, perhaps for a long time, because first Welsh nationalism and now Brexit have supplied fresher vehicles for misgivings about distant executive government.

In terms of winnable seats, Lib Dems are now thrown back on their core vote: socially liberal, university-educated professionals, mostly in the home counties and disproportionately in the public sector. These voters tend to appreciate the party’s emphasis on civil liberties, the environment, international openness and community democracy, and its seriousness about policy-making. If resources and arguments are targeted appropriately, Guildford, Wimbledon, Hitchin and Cambridgeshire South can follow at the next election where Richmond Park and St Albans led last Thursday.

Focusing attention on these voters has several advantages for the Lib Dems. It will give the party a coherent identity once again. And this electoral constituency is a growing demographic. It will never be big enough to provide a majority, but for too long the deluded search for one has seduced Lib Dems into making discordant promises to different groups.

There’s no point in claiming that increasing their vote share last week was a great achievement, still less that it was a mandate for proportional representation. The only way to make the case for PR is to show how hung parliaments can produce real benefits through scrutiny and compromise. But the Lib Dems’ behaviour this decade suggests they haven’t always believed that themselves. Their rejection of the coalition and of Brexit has been too wilfully ideological. It is parliament itself, and pragmatic, strategic politics within it, that the party ought to defend. If they can’t win votes on a ticket of respect for political institutions, it won’t just be the Lib Dems whose prospects are gloomy.

• Jonathan Parry teaches modern history at Cambridge


Jonathan Parry

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Lib Dems hate Labour more than they hate Brexit | Owen Jones
Jo Swinson’s aggressive campaign to split the remain vote is a gift to Boris Johnson, says Guardian columnist Owen Jones

Owen Jones

14, Nov, 2019 @10:29 AM

Article image
In many places voting Lib Dem is the best way to keep Boris Johnson out of No 10 | Jo Swinson
Britain needs a change of leadership to end austerity, injustice and the folly of Brexit, says Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson

Jo Swinson

11, Dec, 2019 @1:14 PM

Article image
Jo Swinson says she won’t back Corbyn. But ultimately she’ll have to | Vernon Bogdanor
If there is a hung parliament, the Lib Dems will end up backing Labour. They know their supporters want a second referendum, says professor of government Vernon Bogdanor

Vernon Bogdanor

02, Dec, 2019 @5:54 PM

Article image
The Liberal Democrats misread the political mood. Yet perhaps not all is lost | Martin Kettle
Though they overplayed their hand on Brexit, and Jo Swinson overreached with her No 10 claim, there’s time for a recovery, says Guardian columnist Martin Kettle

Martin Kettle

04, Dec, 2019 @6:14 PM

Article image
Beware of dodgy tactical voting sites – they’re the last resort of outmoded centrists | Ellie Mae O’Hagan
Technocrats still think they can win without making political arguments, says politics and culture writer Ellie Mae O’Hagan

Ellie Mae O’Hagan

07, Nov, 2019 @1:03 PM

Article image
Behold, the perfect fake tweet. Look and learn, Putin | Joel Golby
Whoever was behind the ‘Jo Swinson quitting’ tweet struck gold. No wonder politicians were suckered in, says Joel Golby, author of Brilliant, Brilliant, Brilliant Brilliant Brilliant

Joel Golby

07, Dec, 2019 @9:00 AM

Article image
Jo Swinson says Labour and the Tories are the same on Brexit. That’s just not true | Chaminda Jayanetti
In fact, Jeremy Corbyn’s current Brexit policy is close to what the Lib Dems pledged in 2017, says politics journalist Chaminda Jayanetti

Chaminda Jayanetti

07, Nov, 2019 @5:09 PM

Article image
By dismissing Corbyn’s overtures, the Lib Dems are showing their true colours | Owen Jones
Jo Swinson was happier propping up David Cameron for five years than the Labour leader for five weeks, says Guardian columnist Owen Jones

Owen Jones

16, Aug, 2019 @12:43 PM

Article image
The Lib Dems are deeply stained by austerity. Don’t trust them | Frances Ryan
The party may be enjoying a resurgence, but its role in keeping the Tories in government can’t easily be forgotten, says Guardian columnist Frances Ryan

Frances Ryan

23, Jul, 2019 @4:02 PM

Article image
The Lib Dems’ plan to revoke article 50 is as undemocratic as the race to no deal | Stephen Kinnock
Only a deal that represents the referendum result can break the deadlock, says Labour MP Stephen Kinnock

Stephen Kinnock

10, Sep, 2019 @5:24 PM