The Guardian view on Myanmar and genocide: humanity on trial | Editorial

Criticism of Aung San Suu Kyi’s defence of her country must not overshadow the issue at the heart of the case at the international court of justice: the ongoing suffering of Rohingya Muslims

Aung San Suu Kyi’s decision to personally defend Myanmar in the genocide case at the international court of justice this week has torn away any scant remaining shreds of moral credibility from the figure once lauded as a champion of democracy and the fight against oppression. Yet what is at stake is far more than one woman’s reputation.

Nor is this even about the six military leaders – including the commander in chief – who UN-appointed investigators last year said should be prosecuted for the “gravest” crimes against civilians, including genocide. This is about the more than 700,000 Rohingya Muslims from Rakhine state forced to flee to Bangladesh since late 2016, the 10,000 who UN investigators believe may have died in the crackdown, and the 600,000 still living in apartheid conditions, denied basic rights.

Lawyers for the Gambia, which has brought this case with the backing of the 57-nation Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, laid out the details: the mass shootings, throat slittings, infanticide, torture, rape and burning down of villages, carried out systematically and together amounting to the destruction of the Rohingya as a group, in whole or part. These crimes are well documented.

Even the Nobel peace laureate conceded that “it cannot be ruled out that disproportionate force was used by members of the defence services in some cases in disregard of international humanitarian law, or that they did not distinguish clearly enough between fighters and civilians”. But this did not, she argued, amount to genocide. She did not once use the term Rohingya.

She dismissed the accusations against Myanmar as an incomplete and factually misleading account. (Though the “clearance operation” followed attacks by militant groups on security forces, all the evidence points not to a targeted campaign against insurgents, but a pogrom against a people who have suffered decades of discrimination.) She claimed that authorities had held troops to account – yet even when soldiers were jailed for the murder of 10 Muslim men in the village of Inn Din, they were released after less than a year, while two Reuters journalists who exposed the killings served more than 500 days.

Her personal representation of Myanmar has dispelled any lingering hope that she was acting reluctantly as leader of the civilian government in a country where the military still call the shots. The rallies held to celebrate her advocacy reinforce the suspicion that this appearance is designed to boost her popularity ahead of 2020’s elections. And while she was defending her country in front of the UN’s highest court in the Hague, dozens of Rohingya – including 23 children – were in court in Myanmar for attempting to flee the misery.

To prove genocide requires evidence of intent as well as of atrocities: the bar is high. Even if the court agrees to issue provisional measures to protect the Rohingya, the impact is unclear. The ICJ ordered such measures in 1993; two years later, 8,000 men and boys were massacred at Srebrenica. Myanmar’s generals are largely inured to international condemnation. But the reminder that there may one day be consequences for their actions could offer some deterrent to the worst abuses. It could also increase the pressure on the security council to take on the issue. China has received little scrutiny for its role in sheltering Myanmar. This case had to be brought, not only in the hope of offering some protection to the Rohingya, but because – as the court was reminded – what is on trial is not only the state of Myanmar but our collective humanity.



The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on returning the Rohingya: a bad deal, worsened by haste | Editorial
Editorial: Myanmar and Bangladesh have agreed to repatriate the 650,000 refugees who have fled violence in Rakhine state within two years. Many are concerned – and rightly so


16, Jan, 2018 @6:09 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on returning the Rohingya to Myanmar: don’t make them go | Editorial
Editorial: Bangladesh appears poised to repatriate members of the Muslim minority who fled the campaign of violence against them. They would be at grave risk


14, Nov, 2018 @6:33 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Rohingya in Myanmar: the Lady’s failings, the military’s crimes | Editorial
Editorial: The killing and abuse of civilians is a crime against humanity. Aung San Suu Kyi must speak out – but this violence is the army’s


07, Sep, 2017 @6:23 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Aung San Suu Kyi: a deadening silence | Editorial
Editorial: In saying nothing about genocide of the Rohingya or the imprisonment of journalists exposing massacres, the Nobel prize winner is morally complicit in the crimes committed by Myanmar’s military


04, Sep, 2018 @5:49 PM

Article image
UN's top court orders Myanmar to protect Rohingya from genocide
Momentous pronouncement at Hague rejects Aung San Suu Kyi’s defence of her country’s military

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent and Rebecca Ratcliffe South-east Asia correspondent

23, Jan, 2020 @10:12 AM

Article image
Aung San Suu Kyi tells court: Myanmar genocide claims ‘factually misleading’
De facto PM defends actions of government, saying attacks were initiated by insurgents

Owen Bowcott in The Hague

11, Dec, 2019 @11:08 AM

Article image
The persecuted Rohingya now have legal protection, but will it amount to anything? | Francis Wade
The ICJ ruling on Myanmar is a rare bright point in a woeful international response. Unfortunately its powers are limited, says author Francis Wade

Francis Wade

24, Jan, 2020 @4:38 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on atrocities in Myanmar: hold the guilty to account | Editorial
Editorial: The UN has published a damning report on Myanmar. Who can be held responsible, and how?


27, Aug, 2018 @5:35 PM

Article image
Debating the definition of genocide will not save the Rohingya | Charles Petrie
The time for talk is over. The international community has to act, or it could fail in Myanmar just as it failed in Rwanda, says former diplomat Charles Petrie

Charles Petrie

04, Sep, 2018 @7:00 AM

Article image
UK must increase pressure on UN to get justice for the Rohingya | Letters
Letters: Mike Noyes of ActionAid UK and SP Chakravarty write on the human rights abuses suffered by the Muslim minority in Myanmar


06, Sep, 2018 @4:46 PM