At the BBC, impartiality is precious. We will protect it | Fran Unsworth

Those who criticise our election coverage by focusing on a couple of mistakes ignore the overall quality and evenness

• Fran Unsworth is the BBC’s director of news and current affairs

In these febrile and politically polarised times it’s hardly surprising that the BBC, which seeks to represent the nation in its entirety, is a lightning rod for political discontent. People have never been shy of letting us know what they think of our coverage and, in an age of social media, that feedback comes faster than ever. Sometimes it’s from people who’ve actually watched or listened, but nowadays often it’s from those simply consuming others’ impressions of it.

Throughout this election campaign, the BBC’s priority has, and will continue to be, its audiences. Millions have tuned in, and the BBC is consistently rated best for its coverage, ahead of our competitors.

We’ve put party leaders under audience scrutiny with a special Question Time, a seven-way debate, with a head-to-head debate to come this Friday, as well as debates between the parties in each nation of the UK. We’ve broadcast hundreds of hours of programming, with comprehensive outside broadcasts taking a wide range of channels and programmes around the UK.

We’ve ramped up our Reality Check service, fact-checking campaign claims. The Really Simple Guide and the Policy Guide have given online audiences an overview of the choices they face; Your Questions Answered has allowed audiences to put questions directly to the BBC’s experts; and Electioncast has offered an irreverent view of the campaign trail.

But some people have chosen to ignore all of this and focused instead on a couple of editorial mistakes that they suggest are either emblematic of all our election coverage, or damning evidence of an editorial agenda that favours the Conservative party.

Conspiracy theories are much in vogue these days. But we are a large organisation that employs thousands of independently minded journalists. Our editors employ their judgments on their own programmes for their own audiences. These aren’t the ideal conditions for a conspiracy. And we would be particularly inept conspirators were we to produce and broadcast a two-hour leaders’ special debate – a debate in which the prime minister was robustly challenged by the public – run highlights of it on our evening bulletins, cover it in full online and yet rely on a clumsy one-second edit in a short news summary the next day as a means to convey our supposed support for the governing party.

Similarly, to suggest this is in some way linked to an editorial mistake made a fortnight previously by a different team in an office hundreds of miles away, in which an archive cenotaph clip was wrongly used in a news package (about an event broadcast in its entirety by us the day before) is fanciful.

Our audiences want us to be impartial. That means fighting for their interests, not taking sides, and being the trusted place to find out what’s happening.

As we set out at the beginning of the campaign, BBC impartiality does not rely on a stopwatch. We’re not trying to include voices from opposing sides in every single news report, programme or tweet. On some days one party may be in the news more than the others. There is no exact mathematical formula when it comes to this. But over time achieving fair and proportionate coverage will be the standard we hold ourselves to.

Party leaders, and their agendas for government, must all receive scrutiny. We’re as disappointed as our audiences that the prime minister, unlike all his fellow leaders, has not yet confirmed a date for his Andrew Neil interview. The logistics of pinning down party leaders is highly complex; if we had to wait for confirmation of the date and time of every interview by every party before anyone appeared anywhere, hardly anything would get on air. But let’s be clear: we’ll clear our schedules and we’re ready at any time, and any place, for a half-hour interview in which Neil scrutinises Boris Johnson.

This campaign has been unlike any before it. Information is routinely weaponised. Our impartiality is precious to us and we will protect it. We are well aware how news footage can be used to unintended political ends. This week, at our behest, Facebook has removed political adverts by the Conservatives that gave the false impression our presenters were supporting their political agenda. We will do the same if any party distorts our journalism or jeopardises our impartiality.

I don’t necessarily subscribe to the view that if we get complaints from both sides, we are doing something right – though we do receive roughly equal volumes of audience feedback suggesting we favour opposite sides of the political spectrum.

And to those who have suggested we are somehow cowed or unconfident, let me assure you – we are not.

• Fran Unsworth is the BBC’s director of news and current affairs


Fran Unsworth

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Six phoney claims to watch out for from Boris Johnson tonight | Tom Kibasi
In the leadership debateø expect the prime minister to deploy some of his favourite economic myths

Tom Kibasi

22, Nov, 2019 @6:58 PM

Article image
This week on Twitter: things that didn’t actually happen to Boris Johnson | Joel Golby
An ‘anonymous’ letter of support. The prime minister not being laughed at. Who cares about the truth? There’s an election going on, says author Joel Golby

Joel Golby

26, Nov, 2019 @7:25 PM

Article image
The Tories have punched truth in the face | Joel Golby
A mendacious tweet-storm about a phantom punch drowned out the fact that a child was left lying on a hospital floor, says Joel Golby, author of Brilliant, Brilliant, Brilliant Brilliant Brilliant

Joel Golby

10, Dec, 2019 @6:02 PM

Article image
Elections are changing, but broadcasting rules are stuck in the last century | Paul Chadwick
Superficial measures of ‘balance’ do not account for the reality of social media and how people campaign now, says the Guardian readers’ editor, Paul Chadwick

Paul Chadwick

03, Nov, 2019 @9:22 PM

Article image
The BBC’s fabled impartiality was only ever an elite consensus | Tom Mills
The corporation’s establishment orientation accounts for the crisis of legitimacy it now faces, says the lecturer and author Tom Mills

Tom Mills

24, Nov, 2019 @5:57 PM

Article image
The Tories plan an assault on progressive Britain. The left must be prepared | Owen Jones
This government seems set on blurring the line between the centre right and the extremes beyond, says Guardian columnist Owen Jones

Owen Jones

30, Dec, 2019 @10:00 AM

Article image
We need to protect nature to stand any chance of tackling climate chaos | Caroline Lucas
Voters have woken up to the climate emergency. Equally urgent is the threat to wildlife – and the issues are linked, says Caroline Lucas, the Green MP for Brighton Pavilion

Caroline Lucas

05, Dec, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
How Boris Johnson and Brexit are Berlusconifying Britain | William Davies
Divisions between politics, the media and business have dissolved, eroding integrity. It’s not bad news for everyone, says political economist William Davies

William Davies

04, Dec, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
I worked at Facebook - here’s how to fix social media’s political ads problem | Clare O’Donoghue Velikić
I know abuses have given online ads a bad name, but banning them isn’t the answer, says Clare O’Donoghue Velikić

Clare O'Donoghue Velikić

06, Dec, 2019 @1:30 PM

Article image
This was supposed to be the climate crisis election. So what happened? | Stephen Buranyi
With the Tories obsessed with Brexit, the issue hasn’t gained traction in the media, says London-based writer Stephen Buranyi

Stephen Buranyi

09, Dec, 2019 @10:50 AM