Ten years after its near-collapse, RBS is still a toxic brand | Fran Boait

This week the bank’s chairman suggested a name change. What ii really needs to do is regain the trust of the British public

Looking back, there are two extraordinary aspects to what’s happened to RBS over the last 10 years. One is the new depths to which the bank has plummeted. It’s doubled down on the worst excesses of the pre-crisis period, faced multiple investigations and has been mired in constant scandals. The second shocking fact is that the bank has done so under public ownership. The government has had the power to put a stop to RBS’s misdemeanours, but has chosen not to.

This Saturday marks 10 years since the moment when the government became RBS’s majority shareholder, rescuing the bank from imminent collapse. Despite the fact that people are fed up with our self-serving banking system, and despite the taxpayer having a controlling stake in one of our biggest banks, we haven’t seen any significant change over the decade, just disappointment after disappointment. The story of RBS is the story of the UK’s broken banking system: banks get bailed out and the public gets sold out. It’s also a story of the failure to adequately punish those who oversaw reckless and greedy behaviour and brought the country to the brink 10 years ago.

Seventy-two per cent of people think that banks should have faced more severe penalties for their role in the financial crisis. Fred “the Shred” Goodwin, the RBS boss who oversaw the horrendous practices leading to its collapse, now enjoys a £450,000 pension, and has received almost £6m since quitting a decade ago. After resigning in 2008, the worst penalty he faced was being stripped of his knighthood. How he deserved it in the first place is another conversation.

Ten years ago, RBS was the world’s biggest bank, after Goodwin led it through a number of dodgy takeovers. Since its near-collapse, its legacy of bad practices and scandals have streamed into the public domain. Only this August, RBS was fined £3.9bn for deliberately selling mortgage packages pre-2008 that were “total fucking garbage”, according to the bank’s chief credit officer in the US. Probably the worst is the debacle of the RBS Global Restructuring Group. In this scandal, RBS was alleged to have deliberately pushed small businesses towards insolvency in order to shore up the bank’s own capital position, before in some cases stripping them of assets.

The bank is currently presiding over a devastating programme of branch closures, adding to the more than 1,500 communities without a high-street bank. British banks such as RBS have a record of consistently failing to meet the needs of the UK economy, with the vast majority of their lending going towards speculation on property and other already-existing assets, and only a fraction going towards productive projects. As if that wasn’t bad enough, last week RBS boss Ross McEwan suggested that the bank has become even less willing to lend towards industries such as retail and construction. In doing so, it is denying the investment that could help save Britain’s struggling high streets and address the housing crisis.

In rescuing RBS, the government has chosen to have ownership but not control – the bailout package of £45.5bn of taxpayer money came with no strings attached. Perhaps this was panic and lack of foresight. Regardless, with its majority stake in the company, the government could step in to rein in these excesses, and put the bank to use for the good of the public. But instead it’s opting to press ahead with privatisation, which could mean a loss for the taxpayer of over £26bn. There are even rumours that RBS wants to get sold back quickly to the private sector because it fears a general election and a Labour government. Indeed, Labour has signalled interest in a proposal to break it up and turn it into a network of smaller, regionally based banks.

Perhaps that’s why this week chairman Howard Davies has suggested that RBS change its name; it’s clearly still a toxic brand. There are many things that we need to change urgently about RBS: its behaviour, structure and mission, but a superficial name change will help with none of them. McEwan is right to recognise that the bank still needs to regain the trust of the British public. But unfortunately he’s taking the wrong approach to making amends. RBS needs to work in the interests of the British public – instead of closing branches, ripping off small businesses and lending for speculation, it should lead the way in banking by serving local communities and the real economy. The future of RBS can be seen as a key battleground for a public that wants to see a banking sector that actually works in their interests. We mustn’t let the government sell it off.

• Fran Boait is executive director of campaign group Positive Money


Fran Boait

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Ten years after the crash: have the lessons of Lehman been learned? | Yanis Varoufakis and others
Our panel of writers considers what has changed – and what still needs to

Yanis Varoufakis, Ann Pettifor , Mark Littlewood, David Blanchflower, Olli Rehn, Nicky Morgan, and Micah White

14, Sep, 2018 @11:04 AM

Article image
Fred Goodwin escapes sanction for taking RBS to the brink of collapse
FSA poised to conclude 17-month investigation into crisis at RBS without taking sanctions against any individual director

Jill Treanor

01, Dec, 2010 @10:00 PM

Afua Hirsch: Human rights apply to everyone – even bankers like Fred Goodwin

Afua Hirsch: We all want Fred Goodwin to give his pension back, but retrospective legislation sets a dangerous precedent

Afua Hirsch

03, Mar, 2009 @3:00 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on high pay: the fat cats are still there | Editorial
Editorial: Vast disparities in income may have lost some of their power to shock. But they remain a gross injustice


20, Aug, 2021 @5:07 PM

RBS boss Stephen Hester defends bonuses
Royal Bank of Scotland's chief executive says competitive pay packages are essential to retain key staff

Jill Treanor

07, Aug, 2009 @7:07 PM

Catherine Bennett: Want to hurt Sir Fred? Well, take away that knighthood

Catherine Bennett: It's not realistic or effective to seize the disgraced banker's pension. But his title is quite another matter

Catherine Bennett

08, Mar, 2009 @12:01 AM

Article image
Ten years after the financial crash, the timid left should be full of regrets | Larry Elliott
Capitalism’s near-death experience was a golden opportunity for progressives. But they blew it, says the Guardian’s economics editor Larry Elliott

Larry Elliott

30, Aug, 2018 @4:59 AM

Afua Hirsch: Shouldn't UK bankers like Sir Fred Goodwin face prosecution too?

Afua Hirsch: In the US, irresponsible bankers face justice – so surely there's a case for prosecuting top executives like the RBS's Fred Goodwin

Afua Hirsch

20, Jan, 2009 @4:20 PM

Myners defends himself over Goodwin pension controversy at RBS

I knew how much he was getting, but not that it had been doubled, City minister insists in letter

Jill Treanor

25, Mar, 2009 @4:24 PM

Article image
RBS chairman rocked by stinging attack over £12bn cash call

Sir Fred Goodwin says cash call is 'the right decision' as his chairman comes under fire

Jill Treanor

23, Apr, 2008 @4:30 PM