St Olave’s is not alone. Schools with dodgy practices are everywhere | Fiona Millar

The marketisation of schools has unleashed a dark side where performance tables are more important than pupils’ welfare

I suppose we should feel outraged at the damning report into shameful practices at St Olave’s super-selective grammar school, where high-flying pupils, who couldn’t quite fly high enough, were systematically forced out the door halfway through their A-levels. An independent inquiry has now accused the school of treating its students as “collateral damage”, preferring to focus on its institutional reputation rather than the wellbeing of its young people, some of whom were reported to be suicidal at the prospect of rejection and public humiliation.

However, my overwhelming response was one of dull resignation. Here we go again: yet another example of how the market approach to schooling has spiralled out of control, exposing the dark side of high-stakes competition within which all schools must jostle for position. It isn’t just the “top end” of the schools market in which pupils are “collateral damage”, though harnessing the outrage of the most powerfully motivated parents in a school like St Olave’s certainly helps to guarantee headlines.

Having spent the last year researching a new book – The Best for My Child. Did the schools market deliver? – and looking at the 30 years of education policy since the 1988 Education Act introduced the idea of parent choice and competition, it is clear there are dodgy practices everywhere. Covert selection – schools finding increasingly ingenious ways of keeping out the pupils least likely to succeed – is rife. In the pre-Michael Gove years some pupils were disadvantaged by widespread gaming of the curriculum – the liberal use of qualifications that counted in the performance measure but were less rigorous than GCSEs and limited future opportunities for pupils.

And now we have the phenomenon of “off-rolling”, which was first uncovered by the education analytics organisation Education Datalab last year in the course of an investigation, Who’s Left. This looked at the number of pupils disappearing from the rolls of more inclusive schools than St Olave’s in the run-up to GCSE examinations. In some schools the number of pupils leaving between Year 7 and Year 11 was more than 50% of the number of pupils who complete their secondary education at the school. It would appear that thousands of young people every year are being pushed out into unsatisfactory alternative education, or no education at all, and the problem is worse in some academy chains, pointing to another problem with the market approach.

The rapid increase in diversity, with thousands of independent state schools contracted to central government rather than operating under the auspices of the local authority, has led to fragmented, weak systems of local oversight making it easier for some schools to cheat.

There is no doubt that public accountability in terms of performance tables and Ofsted, introduced after the 1988 act, helped schools get better. Most are now solidly good, safe, well-functioning environments though changes to exams and performance metrics make it hard to carry out accurate like-for-like comparisons in standards. Many more young people are staying on in education and training than was the case 30 years ago, and gaps in attainment are starting to narrow, though some estimates suggest it would take another half century before the poorest children catch up with the better off.

Nevertheless, market pressure has encouraged unethical behaviour with headteachers repeatedly obliged to choose between doing what is best for their schools, and what is best for their pupils. Some, like the former head at St Olave’s, come down on the side of the school rather than the pupil. Others may take a hit in their results for “doing the right thing” and the time has come to confront the market failure and consider a new approach.

It is unlikely that parent choice and public accountability of school performance are going anywhere soon. We live in an unashamedly consumer society which has reached its tentacles firmly into the public realm. But the market could be tamed by introducing more rigorous local oversight of school admissions and exclusions than we have at present. Prof Becky Allen, who led the research into off-rolling, told me: “Human relationships and a strong regulatory middle tier work together to promote ethnical leadership.”

More imaginative ways of holding schools to account need to be developed; either by counting the results of the pupils who have left in the performance measures, or introducing area-wide accountability, in which the responsibility for every child in an area becomes the responsibility of all schools in that community. Finally, at a time when employers bemoan the lack of hard and soft skills in young employees, why do we rely so heavily on academic exam results to judge success? What about broader measures of achievement – maybe a real baccalaureate-style qualification – to include personal attributes, technical and vocational qualifications.

The best for my child/best for my school approach has run its course. We know now there is “collateral damage” everywhere. Let’s hope the next 30 years can be different.

• Fiona Millar is a writer and journalist specialising in education and parenting issues. Her book, The Best for My Child. Did the schools market deliver? (John Catt Educational Ltd) is out now

Contributor

Fiona Millar

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Two Blackburn faith schools top charts for GCSE progress
Tauheedul Islam girls’ and boys’ schools ranked first and second of all schools in England using government’s new measure

Richard Adams Education editor

13, Oct, 2016 @12:49 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on schools: boost children, not results | Editorial
Editorial: In revealing the appalling treatment of children forced out by a top grammar school, a new report has highlighted the broader problem of ‘off-rolling’

Editorial

11, Jul, 2018 @5:18 PM

Article image
Grammar schools lose top spots after league table shakeup
DfE’s latest tables, ranked using new Progress 8 measure, show schools that made greatest advances in pupils’ grades

Richard Adams and Helena Bengtsson

19, Jan, 2017 @9:30 AM

Article image
Football tournaments penalise GCSE students. Can’t we avoid this fixture clash? | Gavin Kelly
A study shows pupils massively underperform in years when there’s a World Cup, says the chief executive of the Resolution Trust, Gavin Kelly

Gavin Kelly

04, Feb, 2019 @10:57 AM

Article image
Exams, grammar schools, and the trouble with sorting the sheep from the goats | Letters
Letters: Kids deserve credit for what they are good at whatever it is, and should not be measured against an arbitrary metric which rates one talent lower than another

Letters

23, Aug, 2016 @6:32 PM

Article image
England’s school assessment system favours the sharp-elbowed and the wealthy | Gaby Hinsliff
It’s good that teachers, not algorithms, are in control. But they face huge pressure to inflate grades, says Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff

Gaby Hinsliff

18, Jun, 2021 @7:00 AM

Article image
Cancel this year's GCSEs and A-levels if schools disrupted, says top academy head
Hamid Patel, of Star Academies, calls on government to reschedule exams for 2021

Richard Adams Education editor, Owen Bowcott

15, Mar, 2020 @7:31 PM

Article image
GCSE results set to accelerate drive to turn schools into academies
Number of secondary schools seen as 'failing' has nearly doubled in a year after government raised minimum pass rate

Peter Walker

24, Jan, 2013 @4:38 PM

Article image
For parents and teachers, sending children back to school will be a leap of faith | Gaby Hinsliff
What everyone in education knows but nobody can say is that nothing in the time of Covid can ever be completely safe, says Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff

Gaby Hinsliff

13, Aug, 2020 @3:38 PM

Article image
This year's A-level results will only exacerbate existing inequality | Zoe Williams
Parents investing in private education will feel pretty satisfied with the grades – but not those who can’t afford to, says Guardian columnist Zoe Williams

Zoe Williams

11, Aug, 2021 @4:49 PM