Worrying about robots stealing our jobs? How silly | Simon Jenkins

The digital age will free us up not only for leisure activities but also to take on caring roles that can only be filled by humans

So we are doomed. Robots will steal our jobs. Algorithms will capture our children. Artificial intelligence will corrupt our free will. We are to be slaves to machines.

The Bank of England economist Andy Haldane warns today that “large swathes” of current labour will disappear as AI takes over. For a man who lives and breathes statistics, large swathes is a poor percentage. These jeremiads attended the invention of computers, combine harvesters, spinning jennies and probably iron-age axes. But no one gets on the Today programme for predicting that AI might be good news.

How is it then that elsewhere in the news, we hear of people frantic for staff? There are currently 90,000 vacancies in social care and 24,000 in nursing. A chronic labour shortage in British social services has risen from 7% six years ago to 11% today. Education is suffering likewise. Employers across the health, construction, agriculture, travel and hospitality sectors are screaming that Brexit heralds an employment disaster, as the EU migrant tap is turned off.

The idea that algorithms, robots and 3D computer printing will render these booming industries redundant is silly. Clearly new technology will mechanise a number of activities. As throughout history, innovation requires labour markets to shift and people – or their offspring – to retrain. The reality of economic history is that technology and trade yield short-term disruption. The same thing happened with refrigerated transport in the 1880s and combine harvesting between the wars. But we survived and prospered as new needs, and jobs, emerged. Haldane’s gloom merely serves the looming politics of protectionism and chauvinism.

The latest cliche, the “fourth industrial revolution”, supposedly describes a new algorithmic age. If there is to be a fourth revolution it will be the complete opposite, a reversion to the economy of human experience. The digital age will satisfy the mundanities of life, releasing leisure time for activities that are already soaring in demand. These cover everything from health, beauty, travel, food, the arts and entertainment to psychotherapy, social work, the care of children and the elderly. These service industries essentially involve human relationships. They cannot be done by robots or machines. They are labour-intensive and they are costly, whether in the private or public sector. They are also booming. Leisure and travel is second in value only to financial services.

Economists obsessed with manufacturing statistics would do better to welcome AI as releasing workers into the experience economy. They should discuss how we are going to pay for them, especially those concentrated in the public sector. They should stop grabbing easy headlines by encouraging those now suffering a Trump/Brexit retreat into chauvinist job protectionism.

• Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist


Simon Jenkins

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
What depressed robots can teach us about mental health | Zachary Mainen
The idea of a depressed computer may seem absurd – but artificial intelligence and the human brain share a vital feature, writes neuroscientist Zachary Mainen

Zachary Mainen

16, Apr, 2018 @1:04 PM

Article image
Women must act now, or male-designed robots will take over our lives | Ivana Bartoletti
Algorithms are displaying white male bias, and automation is decimating jobs – we have a lot to lose unless we get involved, says Ivana Bartoletti of the Fabian Women’s Network

Ivana Bartoletti

13, Mar, 2018 @3:50 PM

Article image
If we’re spooked by a ‘shopbot’, we’re definitely not ready for NHS droids | Stuart Heritage
Why does the government think we will trust helpline automatons to diagnose our illnesses, asks the Guardian writer Stuart Heritage

Stuart Heritage

22, Jan, 2018 @2:18 PM

Article image
Robots may soon be able to reproduce - will this change how we think about evolution? | Emma Hart
Nature is full of examples of biology adapting to its surroundings. Technology may just be about to catch up, says Emma Hart of Edinburgh Napier University

Emma Hart

21, Jun, 2021 @9:10 AM

Article image
Robots can take our jobs, but they will never render obsolete our love | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Loose canon: Yes, a machine could technically breastfeed a child. But only a mother can provide that vital human expression of a love that overcomes exhaustion

Giles Fraser

02, Feb, 2017 @3:42 PM

Article image
Why the rise of the robots could allow humans to flourish again | Giles Fraser: Loose canon
Loose canon: Nobody’s job is safe. But a citizen’s income in a post-work world could see us avoid the Terminator scenario and return to pre-capitalist sources of value

Giles Fraser

31, Aug, 2017 @3:05 PM

Article image
What's the difference between robots and humans? It's my newt | David Boyle
It was a pleasure to help judge the AI programs attempting to pass the Turing test and win this year’s Loebner prize, but strangely unnerving

David Boyle

22, Sep, 2016 @9:30 AM

Article image
To save us from a Kafkaesque future, we must democratise AI | Stephen Cave
The history of artificial intelligence is entwined with state and corporate power, says Stephen Cave, executive director of the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence

Stephen Cave

04, Jan, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
We hold people with power to account. Why not algorithms? | Hannah Fry
As we delegate more responsibility to technology to run our lives, we must regulate it, says the mathematician Hannah Fry

Hannah Fry

17, Sep, 2018 @5:00 AM

Article image
The future of AI is chilling – humans have to act together to overcome this threat to civilisation | Jonathan Freedland
The challenge seems daunting. But we have overcome terrifying dangers before, says Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland

Jonathan Freedland

26, May, 2023 @4:37 PM