The arc of the moral universe is long and, in the case of Ratko Mladić, it has finally bent towards justice. More than two decades since the Srebrenica massacre, more than five years after his trial began, and following evidence from almost 600 witnesses, the “butcher of Bosnia” was sentenced to life imprisonment by a UN tribunal at The Hague on Wednesday for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The UN high commissioner for human rights, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, hailed it as a warning to other perpetrators. “They will not escape justice, no matter how powerful they may be nor how long it may take. They will be held accountable,” he said.

Activists from Syria and Myanmar echoed those words. But to many, the promise will ring hollow. When the trial of the former Bosnian Serb commander and others began at the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, it seemed to herald a new and better era. This was supposed to be the end of impunity. In retrospect, it looks like a high watermark for international justice for mass crimes.

The verdict arrived as the US warned that “ethnic cleansing” was taking place in Myanmar, where recent reports have laid bare the murder of infants and the use of rape as a weapon against the Rohingya. In Syria, Bashar al-Assad’s murderous reign continues and civilians pay with their lives. Kim Jong-un is under pressure over North Korea’s nuclear programme, not its grotesque human rights abuses. The US and UK have supported the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen despite the bombing of schools and hospitals and the blockade reportedly now to be lifted.

The US was never likely to sign up to the international criminal court and is further than ever from doing so, abandoning even the pretence of moral leadership. Burundi has become the first nation to leave the court, which is accused of unfairly targeting African countries and ignoring the sins of western leaders (though its chief prosecutor has just requested authorisation to investigate reported human rights abuses in Afghanistan, including by the US military and the CIA; US citizens can be charged with crimes in ICC member states). The UK and others are lobbying to block the ICC from activating the crime of aggression. Meanwhile the growing heft of Russia and China has made it harder to pursue human rights abuses at the UN.

And though the chief architects of genocide in the Balkans have been convicted, many more of the guilty walk free. With the imminent closure of the Hague tribunal, the task of prosecution now lies with national courts. Prosecutor Serge Brammertz warned recently that regional judicial cooperation in war crimes justice is “heading in the wrong direction” and that “the message of denial and revisionism is loud and clear … your war criminals are our heroes”.

The light is flickering; it is not extinguished. Justice cannot bring back the dead or erase trauma. But anyone who doubts its importance in and of itself should listen to the survivors and victims’ families speaking on Wednesday and to Bosnian Muslims more broadly. The hunt for Mladić took 14 years and at times seemed almost hopeless. The tenacity and commitment that brought about his trial and conviction will be required many times over if the arc is to bend the right way again. The verdict reminds us of what is possible. It was, said Mr Zeid, the epitome of international justice. It must not be its epitaph.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Srebrenica 25 years on: how the world lost its appetite to fight war crimes
Ratko Mladić was brought to justice but where’s the desire to investigate mass killings in Syria, Yemen and Myanmar?

Julian Borger world affairs editor

05, Jul, 2020 @7:06 AM

Article image
Genocide charges are just too hard to prove – even in former Yugoslavia | Letters
Letters: Although Ratko Mladić has been convicted of genocide in Srebrenica, the bar is set so high that it is nearly impossible to prove the commission of the crime

Letters

29, Nov, 2017 @7:17 PM

Article image
Papers reveal Anglo-French distrust before Srebrenica massacre
Archives show British PM was warned France may have made secret deal with Bosnian Serbs

Owen Bowcott and Caroline Davies

31, Dec, 2019 @12:01 AM

Article image
Ratko Mladić must get life sentence, say war crimes prosecutors
Lawyers at The Hague say any lesser punishment for Bosnian Serb military commander would be ‘insult to his victims’

Julian Borger World affairs editor

07, Dec, 2016 @5:59 PM

Article image
Serb elite face exposure over aid to war crimes suspects Karadzic and Mladic
Prosecutors say collusion included army, police and Orthodox church but resistance likely as many reject guilt over atrocities

Julian Borger in Belgrade

21, Jun, 2012 @3:30 PM

Article image
War crimes courts and tribunals proliferate

International criminal court is latest embodiment of century-old ambition to outlaw genocide and crimes against humanity

Owen Bowcott, legal affairs correspondent

16, May, 2012 @10:18 PM

Mladic rebukes war crimes court for 'obnoxious' charges

Bosnian Serb commander says genocide claims are 'monstrous' while exchanging gestures and looks with victims' families

Robert Booth in The Hague

03, Jun, 2011 @11:37 AM

Article image
Truth is justice for Srebrenica | Slavenka Drakulić
Slavenka Drakulić: The convictions of Popovic and Beara matter because they bear symbolic witness to the genocide of Bosnian Muslims

Slavenka Drakulić

10, Jun, 2010 @5:00 PM

Article image
Mladic was not alone | Nerzuk Curak

Nerzuk Curak: Justice in the Balkans must encompass not just war criminals, but their whole communities

Nerzuk Curak

03, Jul, 2011 @7:45 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Radovan Karadžić trial: only the end of the beginning | Editorial
Editorial: International justice is still a new idea. So far, it is a long way from perfect. But it is still better than nothing at all

Editorial

24, Mar, 2016 @7:29 PM