The Jenners are Instagram stars, not icons – the T-shirt backlash is proof | Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett

Kylie and Kendall should not mistake their disposable celebrity standing for real talent. Superimposing their faces over musical icons is next-level hubris

• Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett is a London-based freelance writer

What makes a cultural icon? You might say it’s a person, symbol, or idea that resonates with a group of people on a meaningful level, usually to the extent that he, or she, or it becomes moment-defining and evocative of a particular time. Were you to choose, for instance, the 1960s (has there been a more mythologised decade?), a visual directory of recognisable faces pops up – The Beatles, Twiggy, JFK, Jackie O, Christine Keeler, Bob Dylan, Jimi Hendrix, Andy Warhol, and so on.

There used to be a sense that iconic status was earned, whether through artistic output, style, political involvement or influence. But what of now? We live in the age of the Kardashians, those vapid products of “reality” television who resonate only in terms of their image, recognisability and brand allegiances. Yet, in this age of Instagam fame, they nevertheless appear to perceive themselves as icons. Take youngest sisters Kylie and Kendall Jenner, whose line of “vintage” $125 T-shirts saw their own faces literally superimposed over musical stars such as Notorious BIG, Tupac Shakur, Black Sabbath, Metallica, Pink Floyd, the Doors, Kiss and Led Zeppelin. Needless to say, the balls-out audacity of this act has left many reeling. Appropriating someone’s face, apparently without permission, is bad enough, especially when that person is deceased. Slapping your own face on top of it in an attempt to cash in on their immense talent is some next-level hubris.

Girls, you haven’t earned the right to put your face with musical icons. Stick to what you know…lip gloss. pic.twitter.com/BhmuUVrDBn

— Sharon Osbourne (@MrsSOsbourne) June 29, 2017

I think it’s safe to say that, in “disrupting” the symbolism of these musical icons with portraits of their own faces, the Jenners aren’t attempting some kind of meta Situationist détournement in order to make a postmodern statement about the hollowness of mass-media culture. I reckon they just genuinely think they are as culturally important as any of the above. And, in terms of sheer scale, perhaps they are, though what a depressing sentence to have to type. Kendall Jenner has 82.1 million Instagram followers, and her latest trouserless mirror selfie earned her 2.6m likes. Kylie, meanwhile, has 95.6 million followers and her latest standing-in-a-wardrobe-hiding-half-her-face-behind-an-iPhone selfie got 2.3m likes.

Unadulterated internet adoration for doing sweet sod all would inevitably go to even the most humble of human beings’ heads. But to put yourself on the same level as some of the most significant musical acts of the last century takes real cheek. Seeing two very different kinds of cultural meaning collide like this is hilariously jarring, rendered even more so in light of Kendall Jenner’s recent crass attempt to co-opt the Black Lives Matter movement as part of a Pepsi ad. The Jenners clearly believe they merit a place in the cultural pantheon, yet are unsure how to go about staking it out. I suppose you could compare them to the legions of American heiresses who married their way into the British aristocracy in the run-up to the first world war, but instead of trading dollars for titles, they are attempting to trade brand for cultural capital. In other words, they’re not social climbers but cultural climbers, and not very effective ones at that.

Which is why the backlash against this latest gaffe has been so encouraging. People are not about to surrender their cultural icons and their protest movements to celebrities lacking the talent, originality and passion to create something new and inspirational themselves. Music and politics mean something to us, they are stitches in the fabric of who were are, and we defend them to the hilt. Not only that: we feel that icon status is least merited by those who ruthlessly and dispassionately seek it out.

Perhaps history will judge the Kardashians differently – no doubt there is a gender studies thesis being written about them as we speak – but I think we can assume our descendents will judge their cultural meaning as crass and disposable as many of us do now, a fleeting trend in the mass-media internet hype machine that flickers brighter than a blood diamond, titillating millions momentarily, before fading, meaningless, into the murk of cached internet history.

Contributor

Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Strike it lucky: how to perfect your Instagram pose
The new year has brought with it a new Instagram account for Kim Kardashian – and a new set of poses. Follow their lead if you want to rack up more followers

Lauren Cochrane

05, Jan, 2017 @3:42 PM

Article image
Keeping Up With the Kardashians gave America its real first family
Show that gave us Kim, Kylie and Kendall is ending, leaving behind a Kardashianised world

Hadley Freeman

11, Sep, 2020 @11:51 AM

Article image
Keeping Up With the Kardashians is ending. What does it all mean? | Rosa Lyster
After 20 seasons, our time with America’s first family of reality TV will be over. Maybe we’re overthinking it, says writer Rosa Lyster

Rosa Lyster

13, Sep, 2020 @11:23 AM

Article image
Instagram: welcome to fashion's new front row
Forget the catwalk: these days, it’s social media that decides what you wear – and more is definitely more

Jess Cartner-Morley

25, Sep, 2015 @1:00 PM

Article image
Instagram at 10: how sharing photos has entertained us, upset us – and changed our sense of self
From its early days as a whimsical, arthouse space through more recent waves of influencers and pool inflatables, the world’s favourite photo-sharing app has rewired society for good and bad

Jess Cartner-Morley

20, Sep, 2020 @1:00 PM

Article image
Kylie Jenner has found three little words that sum up our age of anxiety | Jean Hannah Edelstein
Like other upbeat insta-phrases, ‘rise and shine’ is a crude instruction to ignore our feelings, says the New York-based journalist Jean Hannah Edelstein

Jean Hannah Edelstein

28, Oct, 2019 @8:30 AM

Article image
Cristiano Ronaldo shoots to top of Instagram rich list
Portugal footballer can command as much as $1.6m to endorse a product on social media

Mark Sweney

30, Jun, 2021 @3:05 PM

Article image
Stylewatch: the Kardashian-Jenners at Kanye West's launch
Everyone’s favourite celebrity dynasty multiplied the shine and sparkle by seven in co-ordinating outfits. We wouldn’t expect anything less

Lauren Cochrane

12, Feb, 2016 @2:06 PM

Article image
Kylie’s bathroom selfie and Diddy’s stairway nap: power moves at the Met Gala 2017
Engineering the perfect red-carpet arrival is no longer enough to truly win at this annual ball – but guests have found plenty more audacious ways to pull rank

Jess Cartner-Morley

02, May, 2017 @4:56 PM

Article image
Nude selfies, cold shoulders and the Hadids: the year in fashion
Here are 19 of the trends that defined 2016

Jess Cartner-Morley

13, Dec, 2016 @6:06 PM