Armageddon hasn’t happened – so the Labour right needs a rethink | Owen Jones

The doomsayers were wrong about voters’ appetite for Jeremy Corbyn’s kind of politics – and going back to the compromise of 2015 would be a fatal mistake

Those who believed that a leftwing prospectus would inevitably condemn Labour to electoral oblivion now have a choice. In last month’s election, it gained seats for the first time since 1997 and achieved its greatest surge in vote share since 1945. The party now has a real – though not inevitable – chance of government. Critics can therefore accept that their narrative is fatally wounded. Or they can abandon claims that they opposed Jeremy Corbyn on electability grounds and admit it was the desirability of his ideas that underpinned their objections. This is the honest and principled position that, for instance, Tony Blair’s former speechwriter Philip Collins has taken.

There are those Labour MPs who saw centrism as an undesirable but necessary formula to win a general election and transform their constituents’ lives. But there are others who remain ideologically and emotionally wedded to centrism and balk at the idea of a leftwing ascendancy in the Labour party. Their beliefs were partly forged as a reaction against leftwing mantras. One of their founding texts is Hammer of the Left by John Golding, a leading figure on Labour’s right in the 1980s, detailing his role in the fightback against Bennism. In 1983, Labour’s right acquiesced to the party standing on a radical manifesto in the hope that the ideas would be buried in electoral Armageddon. They believed the same would happen this time. It didn’t, and now it’s their turn to reassess.

Two big caveats. One, I was someone who originally backed Corbyn for leader but who ended up believing Labour’s poor polling could not be turned around. I was completely wrong. Two, Labour today is overwhelmingly united, because there were many MPs who thought Corbyn’s policy offer desirable but unelectable. But the exceptions need to be challenged before their arguments gain traction.

Take Phil Wilson, Tony Blair’s successor as Labour MP for Sedgefield. Nine months ago, he tweeted an article titled “Jeremy Corbyn will lead Labour into electoral oblivion – and that’s a disaster for Britain”. Now, with that prediction confounded, he offers a deeply misleading postmortem. While the Labour right once castigated the left for its inability to win over middle-class voters, Wilson now accuses Corbyn’s Labour of being too middle-class. “Labour’s campaign struck a chord with the young, especially students,” he claims. Polling suggests Labour in fact attracted its greatest support among working-class voters under 35, and that its majority among young middle-class voters was significantly smaller.

“The middle classes rallied to the causes,” writes Wilson. “Working people, on the other hand, favoured the Tories.” But the post-election polling flatly contradicts this assertion. According to YouGov, Labour had a lead among both part-time and full-time workers. And Ipsos-Mori has estimated that among what pollsters call “DE” voters – the semiskilled and unskilled working class, and those out of work – Labour had a nine-point lead. Corbyn increased Labour’s vote share among working-class voters compared to 2015.

Reading Wilson’s analysis – similar to that which has circulated throughout the media since the election – you would be left with the impression that Labour had lost working-class support, rather than gaining it. What is true is that Ukip’s collapse infused the Tories’ own electoral coalition with older working-class voters. In Ashfield in Nottinghamshire, for instance, Labour’s Gloria De Piero increased her vote, but the Tories nearly doubled theirs. That largely explains the overall working-class swing to the Tories. Labour does need to win these voters over. But let’s stop implying that the 40% who voted for Labour – around two percentage points fewer than the Tories – is awash with trendy middle-class bohemian types.

Labour would not win by “travelling only the middle-class streets of Kensington” or university campuses, is Wilson’s response to an argument that no one is making. Millions of working-class and middle-class Britons voted to tax the top 5% more to invest in the economy and public services, to introduce a living wage, to bring utilities into public ownership, confront the housing crisis, and rid students of the burden of debt. Is that not an achievement worth building on?

I have another fear, too. Some on Labour’s right understand that their route back to the party leadership is all but nonexistent. There may well, then, be the temptation to drive a wedge between the leadership and the party’s younger voters over the EU. Labour’s internal differences are rather more nuanced than they are portrayed: almost all Labour MPs want concessions from the EU, which will make full membership of the single market difficult, if not impossible. It would be a mistake to wrongly portray the leadership as pursuing the same form of Brexit as the Tories in the hope that this will nurture disillusionment among younger votes, not least as the reality of the referendum result begins to hit. Some on the Labour right may believe they can capitalise on this backlash. But the election result was about far more than Brexit or indeed tuition fees, as some commentators suggest. It was Labour’s overall vision that tapped into a growing desire for Britain to be governed by a different social order than one that breeds insecurity and stagnation.

And now, there can be no going back, for any retreat would mean going back to the compromise of 2015, which inspired few and alienated many. Labour does urgently need to address its deficit among older voters, and its doggedly pro-pensioner stance will help win inroads. It needs to expand the electorate further, mobilising even more younger and previous non-voters. It needs to expand its foothold in Scotland. There are no shortage of marginal Tory seats that are in reach because the Tories are in crisis, unable to make the ideological case for their politically bankrupt ideas any more. Labour’s right risks retreating into the same cul-de-sac it often accused the left of residing in: stuck in the past, inflexible, dogma over evidence. But a retreat to Labour’s old formula, at a time when Britain is convulsed by multiple crises, would be a tragedy, and a fatal mistake.


Owen Jones

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Corbyn’s Labour has done well. To win power it needs to do far better | Martin Kettle
June’s election didn’t prove that voters long for a leftwing programme. The truth is far more complex

Martin Kettle

23, Jun, 2017 @6:00 AM

Article image
With its bedrock smashed to pieces, Labour cannot win | Aditya Chakrabortty
Despite Welsh industry’s tragic decline, the party took the region for granted. If the Tories win here, that’s why

Aditya Chakrabortty

09, May, 2017 @4:45 AM

Article image
A message to the rebels: work with Corbyn and Labour can win | Jackie Ashley
Last week’s election result made one thing very clear – the revolt against the leader has had its day. Everyone must focus on the prospect of power now

Jackie Ashley

11, Jun, 2017 @5:13 PM

Article image
How can Labour survive this Tory tidal wave? Reach for the sandbags | Polly Toynbee
Tactical voting and progressive alliances are the only way to save Labour MPs. Otherwise they will disappear from swaths of the country

Polly Toynbee

26, Apr, 2017 @4:50 AM

Article image
If ever there was a time to vote Labour, it is now | George Monbiot
I’d rather live with Jeremy Corbyn’s gentle dithering in pursuit of a better world than give May a mandate to destroy what remains of British decency

George Monbiot

25, Apr, 2017 @6:28 PM

Article image
The question Labour must answer: why isn’t it further ahead in the polls? | Owen Jones
To win the next election the party has to appeal to pensioners and get more working-class young people to turn out to vote, writes Guardian columnist Owen Jones

Owen Jones

29, Nov, 2017 @7:07 PM

Article image
Britain is more divided than ever. Now Labour has a chance to unify it | John Harris
Theresa May is still in No 10 – and the wounds of Brexit are still raw. But Corbyn can build on his party’s amazing breakthrough

John Harris

10, Jun, 2017 @8:58 AM

Article image
Now we know what cost Labour in 2015: Ed Miliband didn’t go far enough | Owen Jones
In the light of Jeremy Corbyn’s surge, it’s now clear that the former Labour leader’s election defeat was caused by pandering to the right of his party , writes Guardian columnist Owen Jones

Owen Jones

20, Jul, 2017 @6:00 AM

Article image
No more excuses: Jeremy Corbyn is to blame for this meltdown | Jonathan Freedland
Labour should be winning, but even its supporters say they can’t vote for a party with Corbyn as leader

Jonathan Freedland

05, May, 2017 @6:50 PM

Article image
Never has British politics felt so wild and unpredictable as in this election | Zoe Williams
The Conservative campaign coarsens by the day, while the U-turns and lurching polls reflect the crumbling of a system that kept voters neatly in their party silos

Zoe Williams

28, May, 2017 @5:35 PM