Feminists misunderstood the presidential election from day one | Liza Featherstone

By banking on the idea that women would support Hillary Clinton just because she was a female candidate, the movement made a terrible mistake

It turns out many women don’t care about Trump’s sexism – nor that Clinton is a woman. A majority of white women voted for Trump. And while Clinton did carry the female vote overall, her advantage among women was a percentage point less than Obama had enjoyed over Romney in 2012. This has left many American feminists reeling. Just how did this happen, they ask?

Lena Dunham, one of many woke, rich, Clinton-supporting celebrities who apparently do not impress the voters of Wisconsin, mourned that white women had been “so unable to see the unity of female identity”. But there is no unity of female identity and there never has been.

Clinton believed her major appeal was her gender. She also counted on women to be offended by Trump’s misogyny. But it turns out “woman” isn’t much of an identity – or even basis for solidarity – in itself.

Feminism has to deal with women in all their diversity. While there’s no doubt that one percenters like Lena Dunham and Katy Perry are bummed out by the election results, they are not affected by it in the same way as a woman operating a pile driver outside of Cleveland, an undocumented nanny from Honduras or an anti-abortion evangelical woman in Tulsa.

Many are now rightly attempting to galvanize women against Trump’s awful sexist persona – and worse, his anti-choice agenda, planning A Million Woman March in Washington DC the day after the inauguration. I plan to attend, but we have to be careful about this appeal to gender, bearing in mind that it didn’t defeat Trump in the first place.

While many women are profoundly insulted by Trump – who is on tape boasting about grabbing women “by the pussy” – and frightened by his rabidly anti-choice vice-president, many more may be waiting to see what he does on immigration and trade. Meanwhile, many men – pro-choice, anti-racist, environmentalist – will be eager to join us in opposing a Trump agenda.

By banking on the idea that women would support a female presidential candidate, feminism made a terrible mistake. Strangely, given feminism’s history of ignoring minorities, the group that they misunderstood the most is white women, who usually vote Republican.

As John Cassidy points out in the New Yorker, not only did Trump carry white women, so did Romney in 2012, McCain in 2008 and Bush in 2004. Presumably, many white women have conservative views, whether on taxes or abortion, and neither Trump’s misogyny nor Clinton’s anatomy could override those commitments.

Trump also appealed to many women who feared downward mobility and poverty, winning a majority of women without college degrees, as well as rural women. He denounced the trade deals that they felt had wrecked their economies, and vowed to create jobs by rebuilding America’s decaying infrastructure. Meanwhile, Clinton partied with her funders in the Hamptons. She represented an out-of-touch elite, and many women felt that deeply and resented her – or simply didn’t care about her campaign.

Clinton also failed to excite some of the women who were part of the traditional Democratic base. She did win among poor women (those making under $50,000 a year), young women, Latinas and, overwhelmingly, black women. But turnout among some of these groups was disappointing. She won black women by two percentage points less than Obama did in 2012. And compared with Obama, her margin even among the much-vaunted Latina vote was about eight points lower.

The dismal election results should be a wake-up call for the likes of Lena Dunham and her supporters. Feminism has to mature beyond childish appeals to female unity, and recognize our many differences. It’s not the first time we’ve had to learn this lesson, but perhaps the trauma of Trump’s election will finally make it stick.


Liza Featherstone

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
'Clinton weaponized Trump’s words': the reaction to the presidential debate
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump went head to head tonight in the first of three highly anticipated clashes. Here’s how they performed

Jill Abramson, Steven W Thrasher, Christopher R Barron, Jamie Weinstein and Lucia Graves

27, Sep, 2016 @4:14 AM

Article image
Who won the third US presidential debate, Trump or Clinton?
Clinton and Trump went head to head in Nevada for the third and final presidential debate, clashing on topics including immigration and Iraq

Lucia Graves, Steven W Thrasher, Jamie Weinstein, Christopher R Barron, Richard Wolffe

20, Oct, 2016 @2:16 PM

Article image
This was the election of disillusionment | Steven Thrasher
Early on, Bernie Sanders sparked hope. But with Clinton and Trump leading their parties, the choice is between bad and worse – enough to put anyone off

Steven W Thrasher

08, Nov, 2016 @12:30 PM

Article image
Has 2016 turned into most trivial US election ever? | Richard Wolffe
What have we really debated through this long contest? Not war and peace, capitalism and socialism, surveillance and privacy – but tweets, and pneumonia

Richard Wolffe

03, Oct, 2016 @5:55 PM

Article image
After the election of Donald Trump, we will not mourn. We will organize | Gloria Steinem
This is a time of great danger, as most of us try to escape control by some of us, and old hierarchies reassert themselves. The risk is great, but so is the prize

Gloria Steinem

10, Nov, 2016 @9:00 AM

Article image
Whether Trump or Clinton wins the US election, what follows is up to us | Rebecca Solnit
When the polls close, a new battle will begin – to resist a racist climate denier, or to force a centrist Democrat to deliver genuinely progressive change

Rebecca Solnit

07, Nov, 2016 @12:00 PM

Article image
What can we salvage from the trauma of the US presidential election? | Lucia Graves
As a woman drew close to the most powerful job in the world, things got ugly. Let’s hope the open misogyny and fightback against it mark a turning point

Lucia Graves

08, Nov, 2016 @1:00 PM

Article image
The FBI's email probe is a fitting end to this dumpster fire of an election | Richard Wolffe
The latest pseudo-scandal to hit Clinton is unlikely to rob her of the presidency. But it sure isn’t going to impress voters already sickened by a shocking campaign

Richard Wolffe

29, Oct, 2016 @9:40 PM

Article image
The Observer view on the American presidential election | Observer editorial
Only a true leader can restore US stature

Observer editorial

06, Mar, 2016 @12:05 AM

Article image
For Hillary Clinton, the email nightmare is far from over | Jill Abramson
Republicans won’t let go, even though there are no charges. The Clintons are justified in feeling they are victims of an endless, rightwing campaign

Jill Abramson

07, Jul, 2016 @11:28 PM