The Guardian view on the meaning of Brexit: they don’t know what they’re doing | Editorial

Britain is waking up to the reality that it has voted to leave the EU without having an agreed plan for what this means in practice. Neither side can afford to let the uncertainty drift on for long

This newspaper was no supporter of the SNP’s Scottish independence referendum in 2014. But at least, for a full 10 months before that vote, it was extremely clear what the electorate was being asked to approve in Scotland’s referendum. That was because, in November 2013, the SNP government had published a 648-page white paper that laid out, in sometimes dizzying detail, what an independent Scotland might look like. As a result, when the vote took place, no one could reasonably complain that they didn’t know what the SNP had in mind if they won.

The contrast between that situation and the one we now face in Britain as a whole following the Brexit vote last week could hardly be greater. With the exception of the one unassailable democratic fact that the UK will now leave the European Union, no one can currently say what Brexit will actually look like. The more than 17 million people who cast their votes for leave last week all agreed on what they did not want – EU membership. But there was no clarity whatever from the leave campaign itself, or among those who supported its cause, about what they would put in its place, above all in terms of the future UK-EU relationship. There was no white paper, let alone 648 pages of one. In fact, there was nothing at all on the table – not a programme, not a policy and not a procedural plan – beyond withdrawal itself.

The details of what those 17 million people have actually voted for grow more unclear by the day, and thus more destabilising. On Monday David Cameron told the Commons that he has established an EU withdrawal unit in Whitehall to undertake what the departing prime minister described as the most complex and most important task that the civil service has had to undertake in generations. Mr Cameron talked about a new negotiation with the EU. But this is highly misleading. He cannot tell the civil service even the broad outlines of what that task involves, because he has handed in his notice. Nor can his successor, who has not been chosen yet. There is also the not exactly minor point that the 27 member states of the EU will have to decide a view too.

All this could have been clarified in the campaign, but it was not. There is therefore a hiatus as the Tory party not only seeks a new leader but works out what a Brexit looks like. It’s also a hiatus during which stock values tumble, currency markets slide and businesses begin to cover their bets amid the uncertainty. This doesn’t help the EU sort out its own post-Brexit course either. Always remember that there aren’t just two but 28 in this broken marriage.

On Monday Boris Johnson began to soften up leave voters for the idea that Brexit would be a slow process and would leave access to the single market and much migration from the EU still intact. As so often, Mr Johnson was fuzzy on the details and evasive on the hard choices that would have to be made. Leave’s victory owed much to the fact that it managed to get through the campaign without having to choose between tight border control and continued single market access. But we have to choose now.

Britain’s domestic political crisis naturally requires time in which to play itself out. It is unrealistic to pretend that a shock of this size can be absorbed within days or even weeks. But Britain must discipline itself to grasp that the timetable is not open-ended. The EU-27 cannot be expected to accommodate the lazy pretence being peddled by Mr Johnson that Britain can have its cake and eat it.

On Tuesday in Brussels Mr Cameron will formally tell the European council about Britain’s vote. He will then leave town. On Wednesday the 27 will continue to discuss Europe’s future without him. This is not just a symbolic change. It is the moment at which the reality becomes clear that Britain is out of the room. Would that it were otherwise. But both the UK and the EU must begin to get real about the new world that last week’s dismaying decision has created.

Contributor

Editorial

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on the Tories and Brexit: Debate? What debate? | Editorial
Editorial: Like Labour, the Conservatives preferred not to debate the difficult practical issues at the heart of the Brexit process

Editorial

03, Oct, 2017 @6:02 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Tory infighting: arming for war against themselves | Editorial
Editorial: With Michael Gove and Boris Johnson pointing their guns at David Cameron over immigration, the Conservatives are risking a more general descent into civil war

Editorial

29, May, 2016 @6:43 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the EU debate: it’s about much more than migration | Editorial
Editorial: The leave campaign is increasingly focused on immigration alone. Labour has a vital role in ensuring that remain’s alternative focuses on wider issues

Editorial

01, Jun, 2016 @6:05 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the leave campaign: anatomy of another elite | Editorial
Editorial: The loudest voices being raised for Brexit are rallying against the establishment. But look at their camp more closely, and you’ll spot vested interest and privilege demanding the right to run Britain to suit itself

Editorial

14, Jun, 2016 @7:04 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the EU referendum: the vote is in, now we must face the consequences | Editorial
Editorial: A prime minister is gone, but that is of nothing compared to the fallout for the economy, our union and Europe. It will all have to be grappled with, and so too will the economic neglect and the social alienation which have driven Britain to the exit door

Editorial

24, Jun, 2016 @11:37 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on the EU debate: David Cameron makes a serious case | Editorial
Editorial: Now that the elections are over, the battle for Britain in Europe will move centre stage. David Cameron’s sense of history is simplistic, but his latest case for remaining in the EU started to raise the tone

Editorial

09, May, 2016 @6:11 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Brexit transition: Mrs May must stand firm | Editorial
Editorial: The prime minister must stop indulging those Tories who would push her towards the EU exit without a deal

Editorial

09, Oct, 2017 @6:14 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on post-Brexit politics: in place of leadership | Editorial
Editorial: As Michael Gove turns from stout backer to backstabber of Boris Johnson, the country looks on in despair. But underlying the battle of the egos lie fateful choices that can’t be ducked for long

Editorial

30, Jun, 2016 @6:37 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on post-Brexit politics: the price of neglecting parliament | Editorial
Editorial: British democracy still starts with Westminster. Brexiter Tories will not get a grip until they accept that, and Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership will continue to crumble until he does the same

Editorial

27, Jun, 2016 @6:49 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the UK’s Brexit choices: pro-Europe to leave Europe | Editorial
Editorial: Whatever EU deal Theresa May makes, it will be unpopular with many people. To deliver withdrawal she needs to teach Britain to be a bit more pro-European

Editorial

26, Jul, 2016 @6:38 PM