Obama's 'drone memo' is finally public. Now show us the library of secret law | Jameel Jaffer

To this administration, transparency comes in the form of deleted pages. But too much of America's legal excuse for killing an American citizen remains classified

A federal appellate court's publication on Monday of the so-called "drone memo" finally allows the American public to evaluate the legal theories that were the basis for one of the Obama administration's most controversial acts – the extrajudicial killing of an American citizen.

Authored three years ago by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), the 41-page memo contends that the president has broad power to carry out the targeted killing of terrorism suspects, even in geographic areas far removed from conventional battlefields.

The publication of the memo is a victory for transparency – the result of hard-fought litigation by the American Civil Liberties Union and the New York Times. (I argued the ACLU's case before the appellate court.) It is a very rare thing for a federal court in the United States to order the release of information that the government contends is properly classified. In transparency litigation in the national-security sphere, the courts almost invariably defer. That the court declined to defer here suggests that it found the arguments from the Obama administration to be not simply unpersuasive but wholly without foundation.

But despite the release of the drone memo, the American public still does not have the information it needs in order to evaluate the lawfulness and wisdom of its government's policies. Indeed, to read through the memo is to be reminded of how successful the Obama administration has been at rationing even the most basic information.

Large parts of the memo – almost a third of it – have been redacted. The first 11 pages, which describe the government's allegations against al-Awlaki, are redacted in their entirety. Throughout the remainder of the memo, citations, sentences and even whole paragraphs have been stripped out, in some cases to protect genuine sources and methods but in others to obscure the precedents underlying the government's legal arguments. The redactions in the drone memo's footnotes are perhaps the most disturbing, because they suggest the existence of an entire body of secret law, a veritable library of authoritative legal opinions produced by Justice Department lawyers but withheld from the American public.

In one instance, the long sought-after drone memo references another legal memo that concluded that al-Awlaki's American citizenship did not "preclude the contemplated lethal action." From this reference, we can deduce that the OLC authored a separate drone memo assessing – and dispensing with – the proposition that an American citizen had the right not to be deprived of his life without some form of judicial process. But that earlier memo, treated by the executive branch as binding law, is still secret.

The American public will not be able to evaluate the lethal drone program without far more information:

  • The government should disclose the list of countries in which it has carried out targeted killings.
  • It should disclose records relating to bystander casualties, so that the public can judge for itself whether the government's targeting decision are as discriminating as the government says they are.
  • It should disclose its investigative reports into past strikes – at least into those strikes that are reported to have resulted in bystander casualties.
  • It should also disclose the OLC's other memos relating to the targeted-killing program – including the memos that relate to targets who are not American citizens. (The court that published the drone memo, notably, also ordered the government to submit other OLC memos for review and possible disclosure.)
  • And it should disclose the factual record that led the OLC to conclude that the extrajudicial killing of Anwar al-Awlaki – again, an American citizen who was located far from any conventional battlefield – would be lawful.

But the release of the drone memo should not obscure the reality: we still know scandalously little about who the American government is killing, and why. Monday's ruling was a step forward – a gesture toward transparency – but unless it leads to much, much more from the drone files, it will be only that: a gesture.


Jameel Jaffer

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
JSoc: Obama's secret assassins | Naomi Wolf

Naomi Wolf: The president has a clandestine network targeting a 'kill list' justified by secret laws. How is that different than a death squad?

Naomi Wolf

03, Feb, 2013 @2:00 PM

Article image
ACLU takes CIA to court as agency denies existence of drone programme

Despite references by president and defence secretary, CIA has refused FOIA request on grounds it cannot confirm drone use

Paul Harris in New York

19, Sep, 2012 @2:17 PM

Article image
US Senate clears way for drone memo author's judicial nomination
David Barron, Harvard law professor who drafted key memo authorizing controversial targeted killing program, poised to become federal judge

Dan Roberts in Washington

21, May, 2014 @8:52 PM

Article image
Obama's drone wars and the normalisation of extrajudicial murder | Michael Boyle

Michael Boyle: Executive privilege has seduced the president into a reckless 'kill first, ask questions later' policy that explodes the US constitution

Michael Boyle

11, Jun, 2012 @4:22 PM

Article image
Critics of US drone programme angered by John Brennan's nomination to CIA

Obama's decision to elevate 'Mr Drone' meets with outrage among liberal groups who plan to protest at inauguration

Paul Harris in New York

10, Jan, 2013 @2:58 PM

Article image
Why Obama's 'targeted killing' is worse than Bush's torture | Mary Ellen O'Connell

Mary Ellen O'Connell: Both are legally prohibited but speciously justified by the White House. The difference? Obama's policy kills innocent bystanders

Mary Ellen O'Connell

20, Jan, 2012 @4:11 PM

Article image
Hina Shamsi on Obama's drone wars: America's targeted killing policy – video interview

The director of the American Civil Liberties Union's national security project talks about why the Obama administration's drone assassinations are not just illegal in many cases, but are becoming increasingly risky for the US itself

Lindsey Bever with Matt Seaton

22, Jul, 2013 @10:30 AM

Article image
Obama must reveal legal memos on his administration's drone killing program | Kade Crockford

Kade Crockford: Brennan's confirmation hearing as CIA director was a crucial test of the Senate's exercise of oversight. It failed; now it's up to us

Kade Crockford, guestblogging for Glenn Greenwald

07, Mar, 2013 @9:07 PM

Article image
ACLU files new lawsuit over Obama administration drone 'kill list'
Top civil liberties group calls for greater transparency regarding ‘targeted killing program’ and how officials handle possibility of civilian deaths

Spencer Ackerman in New York

16, Mar, 2015 @11:00 AM

Article image
Families of US citizens killed in drone strike file wrongful death lawsuit

Yemen strike against "kill list" member Anwar al-Awlaki also killed his teenage son and an alleged al-Qaida propagandist

Karen McVeigh in New York

18, Jul, 2012 @7:09 PM