The London market needs a plan to avoid irrelevance, not endless consultations | Nils Pratley

The decision by CRH to move from the City is understandable, but the group should avoid complacency

Will the last company to leave the London Stock Exchange please turn out the lights?

Actually, the position is not – yet – as bad as that. Building materials group CRH, which, at £31.7bn, is the 19th largest company in the FTSE 100 index, said it will be heading for the exit but its reasons for planning to switch its primary listing to the US aren’t silly.

Three-quarters of CRH’s revenues are in the US these days and it is probably only sensible to try to appear more American when the US is spending squillions to upgrade its infrastructure. In any case, CRH’s links to the UK market aren’t deep. It is an Irish company that moved its primary listing to London as recently as 2011.

In similar fashion, other escape plans haven’t been created on a whim. When mining giant BHP tired of its clunky dual-headed Anglo-Australian corporate structure in 2021, unifying down under was logical: the company is Australian by history, culture and operations.

Ferguson, the company called Wolseley for most of its life, had deeper British roots but, like CRH, its US business had become dominant. As for Flutter, the FTSE 100 gambling company contemplating a secondary listing in the US – and perhaps a primary one thereafter – its rationale is similar: a US betting boom is in full swing and the winnings may eventually eclipse those from its Paddy Power and Betfair operations. (The fact that Ferguson and Flutter’s executives should find it easier to pay themselves megabucks American salaries may or may not be coincidental.)

Any fair tally must also include the ones that thought about leaving but stayed. Unilever’s board wanted to go wholly Dutch but ended up unifying in London when its UK shareholders revolted. Shell, the FT reported this week, thought about going American in 2021, but consolidated in London – and, indeed, dropped the “Royal Dutch” bit in its name along the way.

All the same, the sense of decline for London’s status and clout is undeniable. It will only intensify if, as expected, Japanese group SoftBank opts to relist Arm Holdings – London’s one-time technology star – in New York.

Two deep causes are obvious. First, UK pension funds don’t own the UK market like they used to. The Investor Forum, which represents shareholders with about £700bn in UK equities, produced startling statistics a few months ago to show the changing profile of share ownership. International ownership of FTSE 100 firms increased from 12% to 56% between 1990 and 2020; ownership by UK pension funds and insurance companies, who charged into safety-first bonds, declined from 52% to a little over 4%. It is little wonder that UK-listed companies may feel more footloose if their ultimate owners aren’t tied to the UK.

This would be less of a problem were it not for the second factor – the lack of interesting new arrivals on the market. London’s global market share of flotations, or IPOs, has been falling for years.

The real frustration here, though, is the seeming inability to produce a strategy to fight back. Rules were tweaked to encourage the tech sector, but the supposed prize turned out to be less than glittering when the Covid crop of IPOs produced flops such as THG, Deliveroo and

Better ideas are in the offing. Julia Hoggett, the new-ish boss of the stock exchange who has spoken about the need to make London “young, scrappy and hungry”, has raised the interesting idea of creating a regulated UK market to allow private companies to trade shares more easily – a sort of halfway house before full listing. Yes, that might save a few firms from being gobbled by US venture money before taking the leap.

Similarly, a round of consolidation among defined-benefit pension schemes might stop the hollowing-out of ownership and create institutions with an appetite to own UK equities. That is one proposal in the government’s so-called “Edinburgh reforms”. It sounds more promising than another sterile debate about whether London needs to lower its governance standards.

But London needs to get on with it. The Financial Conduct Authority is reviewing the listing rules with a view to collapsing the “standard” and “premium” segments. The exchange has its “capital market taskforce”. And the government has its Edinburgh agenda. This parade of consolations and workstreams is all very well, but life moves fast. City advisers warn that the next departees may not be firms that are semi-detached already. The lure of US dollars is strong.

It “is what it is”, said David Schwimmer, chief executive of the London Stock Exchange Group, about CRH. Yes, we know what he meant: some companies with mostly US businesses may drift away. But, come on, this is not a moment to sound phlegmatic. The London market needs a strategy before a trickle becomes a flood.


Nils Pratley

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Blow to London Stock Exchange as big FTSE 100 firm moves to New York
Decision by CRH a set back for PM’s hope of making City a more attractive place for companies to list

Jasper Jolly

02, Mar, 2023 @1:08 PM

Article image
Private equity’s dominance has gone too far | Nils Pratley
London Stock Exchange should try to create stepping stone between private ownership and quoted status

Nils Pratley

18, Apr, 2023 @5:00 AM

Article image
London stock market review does nothing for private retail investors
Lord Hill’s gentle easing of other governance principles will still invigorate the listings regime

Nils Pratley

02, Mar, 2021 @10:30 PM

Article image
London stock market review should help ordinary investors – not just tech
The government aims to encourage more technology companies to float, but wider reforms are needed

Nils Pratley

02, Mar, 2021 @7:08 AM

Article image
City watchdog may ‘ease rules’ in order to secure $40bn Arm listing
Officials locked in talks with tech firm’s Japanese owner, SoftBank, according to Sunday Times report

Sarah Butler

05, Feb, 2023 @3:08 PM

Article image
Truss and Kwarteng in fresh push to persuade SoftBank to list Arm in UK
Cambridge-based chip designer’s owner prefers US to London but PM and chancellor aim to revive talks

Mark Sweney

16, Sep, 2022 @9:33 AM

Article image
The fudging is over, as monetary policy committee predicts 10.2% inflation | Nils Pratley
The pound slides following gloomy forecasts and confusion within the Bank of England

Nils Pratley

05, May, 2022 @6:51 PM

Article image
FTSE 100 firms hand billions in dividend payouts to Qatar investors
Critics say everyday UK consumer spending has funnelled billions to controversial World Cup host since 2010

Kalyeena Makortoff

10, Nov, 2022 @7:00 AM

Article image
Post-Brexit London is open for business (no matter how grubby)
The City watchdog’s rewriting of the premium listing rules to accommodate a potential mega-listing in London of Aramco is deplorable

Nils Pratley

13, Jul, 2017 @10:57 PM

Article image
Misys drops London IPO citing poor market conditions
Lack of investor interest kills British software firm’s plan to raise £500m from listing on stock exchange

Julia Kollewe

27, Oct, 2016 @7:49 AM