If Jeremy Grantham is talking about a US ‘superbubble’, we should listen

The Boston-based fund manager has hard-to-deny evidence to back up his prediction of a ‘wild rumpus’

Jeremy Grantham’s warning that share prices are heading for a mighty fall is just part of the new year financial calendar, say his critics. On this occasion, however, the British co-founder of Boston-based fund manager GMO and highly regarded observer of stock market bubbles, may have got his timing spot-on.

Certainly “Let the Wild Rumpus Begin” was a terrific title for Grantham’s piece last week: a rumpus is roughly what we’re seeing, at least if one looks at the US, where the technology-heavy Nasdaq has lost 16% since the start of January. It was clobbered so severely on Monday that even the UK’s FTSE 100 index, a decidedly non-tech collection of stocks, was obliged to react to the apparent shift in investor sentiment. The Footsie lost 187 points, or 2.6%, even if a possible Russian invasion of Ukraine was also in the mix.

Grantham’s thesis is that US stocks are in a “superbubble”, an upgrade on last year’s diagnosis of “an epic bubble”, and that the US has seen only three other such extreme events in the past 100 years – the Wall Street crash of 1929, the turn-of-the-millennium dotcom mania and the housing market madness of 2006.

He ran through his checklist of a late-stage bubble, of which “the most important and hardest to define” is “the touchy-feely characteristic of crazy investor behaviour”. On that score, he has hard-to-dispute examples: the meme stock merriness of a year ago; dogecoin, a parody cryptocurrency, rising to a value of $90bn “because Elon Musk kept joking about it”; and shares in car hire firm Hertz soaring because the company said it would order some Teslas.

Those episodes are now over, reckons Grantham, and we’re on to “the vampire phase” of the bull market. Share prices have defied Covid, the end of quantitative easing and the promise of higher rates but, “just as you’re beginning to think the thing is completely immortal, it finally, and perhaps a little anticlimactically, keels over and dies”.

It’s strong stuff and there are, of course, counter-arguments. Corporate earnings are not, on the whole, collapsing. The easing of the Omicron variant may shift western consumers away from consumption of goods and towards spending on services, which could take the edge off current inflation worries. The end of the era of ultra-loose monetary conditions could still be gradual. On the other hand, one should also remember Grantham’s warning a year ago that great bull markets can turn down when the conditions are still favourable – they just have to be “subtly less favourable than they were yesterday”.

Therein lies the debate over whether we’re seeing the removal of some puffed-up extreme over-valuations in corners of the US tech market – think Netflix and Peloton last week – or the start of wider declines for stock markets, fuelled by inflationary problems in energy and food. Grantham’s argument, note, isn’t just that US shares are over-priced; he also includes US houses (“at the highest multiple of family income ever”) and bonds too. It’s the simultaneous nature that, in his view, makes the bubbles so dangerous.

He isn’t always right, but he is a serious student of markets who called the dotcom and 2006-08 crashes with impressive precision. He’s worth listening to. Ukraine aside, the debate he is describing is exactly the one obsessing investors currently. The test of his thesis has been a long time coming.

The stakes are high for Unilever

Unilever, up 7%, defied the gloom as it continued to be a one-company news machine. The latest development is Nelson Peltz, fearsome US activist investor at Trian Partners, taking a stake, reported the FT.

The consumer goods industry is territory Peltz knows well from campaigns at Procter & Gamble and Mondelez. The hard part is guessing what he might want – there’s bound to be something. Possibilities range from a break-up, meaning the sale of Unilever’s food division, to a simple request that the company run its current operations better. Whatever it is, “the fox would now appear to be inside the henhouse”, as Jefferies analyst Martin Deboo put it.

An open question, though, is whether the fox will want a seat on the board. Peltz secured that position at P&G. To put it mildly, it would not be Unilever’s usual style to offer a directorship to an aggressive outsider. Allowing the activist to force a vote on the matter would be risky, however. In their current mood, shareholders may give the wrong answer.


Nils Pratley

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Neil Woodford loyalists pay dearly for stock-picker's style drift
Winding up of flagship fund should also be a big lesson for Hargreaves Lansdown

Nils Pratley

28, Jan, 2020 @6:35 PM

Article image
The stock markets have rallied, so is peak panic over?
In the past fortnight an optimism of sorts has returned but the rebound rests in part on some pretty heroic assumptions

Nils Pratley

31, Mar, 2020 @6:17 PM

Article image
Company dividends soar 16% in a year
Companies flush with cash forecast to pay out £67bn this year

Richard Wachman

17, Oct, 2011 @6:00 AM

Article image
Investors withdraw record £1bn from UK equity funds
British general election jitters, an all-time FTSE 100 high and QE being pumped into the eurozone lures fund managers out of UK equities

Jill Treanor

30, Apr, 2015 @4:16 PM

Article image
FTSE 100 falls in second day of global market turbulence
Panic selling on Wall St spreads amid concern over trade disputes, inflation and Trump’s clash with Fed

Larry Elliott Economics editor

11, Oct, 2018 @5:52 PM

Article image
Global stock markets suffer worst losing streak for five years
Falls in Europe follow nervous US trading as investors question tech giants’ valuations

Jasper Jolly

26, Oct, 2018 @12:39 PM

Article image
Global markets take fright at cocktail of geopolitical risks
US/China trade dispute, US interest rates, Brexit and Italy’s budget spook investors

Richard Partington

24, Oct, 2018 @4:21 AM

Article image
Woodford's fall shows that investment genius rarely lasts | Nils Pratley
Why did it take independent outsiders such as Hargreaves and the FCA so long to notice?

Nils Pratley

04, Jun, 2019 @6:56 PM

Article image
Sports Direct's French Connection flutter looks like a fashion faux pas | Nils Pratley
Mike Ashley showed typical disregard for shareholders’ concerns when he bought a needless stake in the struggling chain

Nils Pratley

02, Feb, 2017 @9:04 PM

Article image
BlackRock now needs to use its voting clout to fuel sustainable investing
It’s good news the world’s largest asset manager aims to change how it invests but actions will speak louder than words

Nils Pratley

14, Jan, 2020 @8:03 PM