Small businesses are collateral damage in social care tax hike | Nils Pratley

The 1.25-point rise in tax on dividend income will hit sole traders and the self-employed

The lower-profile element in the government’s tax hike to raise cash for health and social care was the 1.25% percentage point increase in tax on dividend income. It didn’t generate the same attention as the core revenue-raising “social care levy” on national insurance contributions because, first, the sums are smaller, and, second, because wealthy individuals enjoying dividend income from vast share portfolios are viewed as fair game.

But therein lies the political cynicism in the measure. While some fortunate folk do indeed fit the dividend-happy caricature, not many will be touched by this measure. Those at the top of the bracket long ago moved their holdings offshore. And the comfortable class of private investor knows the first rule of the game: utilise your annual tax-free Isa allowance (currently £20,000).

A wealthy individual who has been Isa-ed up to the max for a couple of decades may well now have a very valuable portfolio of shares that lies, and will continue to lie, entirely outside the reach of dividend taxes. Isa millionaires genuinely exist.

So the bulk of the £600m that the government expects to raise via the change is very likely to come from sole traders, self-employed individuals and directors of very small companies who pay themselves primarily through dividends. Should they also be regarded as a suitable target?

Maybe some should be. But the howls of protest from the likes of the Federation of Small Business “anti-small business, anti-startup” measure deserve sympathy. Many of the affected individuals will be those who got through lockdown without furlough or equivalent support. Their position seems to have been ignored by ministers because talk of taxing dividends conjures a different image.

The measure seems to have been tacked on to the main national insurance proposal at the 11th hour in a desperate attempt to deflect the criticism about the distributional unfairness of hiking national insurance rates. Small businesses and sole traders have been treated as collateral damage in the manoeuvre. If it were a Labour administration making this move, Tories would be screaming blue murder.

Auction for Morrisons will be lively

The last time the Takeover Panel sanctioned a rare auction for a public company, the process turned out to be a damp squib. Carlyle, one of the bidders for healthcare group Vectura, didn’t see the point in competing with Philip Morris’ deep pockets and said it wouldn’t improve its second-placed offer. The auctioneer’s gavel was not required.

Next month’s likely auction for Morrisons is more likely to happen and to be a lively affair. On one side, there’s Fortress Group, which ought to be motivated by the fact that its pursuit of Morrisons is its first big adventure in the UK (Majestic Wine was just a tiddler).

On the other, there’s Clayton, Dubilier and Rice, currently in the lead with its existing £7bn offer. In theory, the private equity firm has an advantage in being able to squeeze a few savings by combining Morrisons with a chain of petrol stations it owns. Really, though, it’s hard to call a clear favourite in the contest.

One can say, though, that an auction is a sensible way to settle the issue, with the important proviso that the trustees of Morrisons’ pension fund must be satisfied with the financial pledges of both bidders. If more upfront cash or securities are demanded, so be it. But it’s time to push for a conclusion to a saga that has been running since mid-June. That’s long enough in the spotlight.

Smiths has made hard work of this sale

The way Smiths Group told the tale a month ago, the FTSE 100 engineering group had scoured the globe and considered multiple offers, as it sought a sale of its misfit medical devices division.

Sign up to the daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

There’s no reason to doubt the thoroughness because Smiths had been trying to sell, on and off, for about a decade. But the resulting planned disposal to US private equity firm TA Associates has now been trumped by California-based ICU Medical, which is the buyer Smiths had lined up three long years ago before that deal collapsed.

The new offer, at an enterprise value of $2.7bn (£1.95bn), is better than TA’s to the tune of $400m on Smiths’ calculations. And, in practice, the terms are slightly sweeter because Smiths gets a 10% stake in ICU by way of $500m part-payment and the buyer’s shares immediately rose by a third.

All’s well that ends well, assuming ICU gets across the line this time. But, blimey, Smiths, which has lost one chief executive along the way, has made this disposal look like hard work.

Contributor

Nils Pratley

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Grumbling Green needs to understand he's not dealing with a legal process
The work and pensions committee just wants to ask some legitimate questions and they can say what they like – that’s showbiz

Nils Pratley

13, Jun, 2016 @6:50 PM

Article image
Morrisons' indignation over shareholder rebellion is misplaced | Nils Pratley
If the supermarket wants investors to back its executives’ pay, it shouldn’t annoy them with a top-up that looks greedy

Nils Pratley

16, Jun, 2017 @6:18 AM

Article image
Snapchat's potential $25bn flotation may sink company's appeal
Amid rumours that it is eyeing an IPO, the app’s fast and furious business model may well put off advertisers

Nils Pratley

16, Nov, 2016 @7:45 PM

Article image
As Morrisons auction looms, pension deals ought to have been nailed down | Nils Pratley
CD&R stepped up to the mark two weeks ago, but Fortress’s foot-dragging looks poor ahead of Saturday

Nils Pratley

30, Sep, 2021 @9:30 PM

Article image
Morrisons’ new owner has plenty of wriggle room in takeover terms | Nils Pratley
CD&R has made fine-sounding pledges but they don’t stop this being yet another debt-fuelled buyout

Nils Pratley

04, Oct, 2021 @6:16 PM

Article image
TalkTalk hoping for rapid results as Dunstone gets his hands dirty
Investors should welcome Sir Charles’s decision to get more involved as chairman but there may be short-term financial pain

Nils Pratley

01, Feb, 2017 @7:29 PM

Article image
Nationalisation plans will bring more than howls of outrage | Nils Pratley
Are Corbyn and McDonnell ready for the onslaught if they really fudge the price?

Nils Pratley

15, May, 2019 @9:30 PM

Article image
Mike Lynch extradition question is a sovereignty issue for UK business | Nils Pratley
UK entrepreneur may have to stand trial in US but it’s hard to imagine the same situation in reverse

Nils Pratley

22, Jul, 2021 @7:07 PM

Article image
Morrisons shouldn’t capitulate in another depressing takeover saga
Latest private equity’s raid on the stock market looks like buyout in which staff and shoppers will be an after-thought

Nils Pratley

21, Jun, 2021 @8:10 PM

Article image
Where Tesco leads on business rates relief, others should follow
Now Morrisons has, Sainsbury’s, B&M and co must decide whether to return the chancellor’s gifts

Nils Pratley

02, Dec, 2020 @11:59 AM