London stock market review does nothing for private retail investors

Lord Hill’s gentle easing of other governance principles will still invigorate the listings regime

“It makes no sense to have a theoretically perfect listing regime if in practice users increasingly choose other venues,” says Lord Hill in the introduction to his report on how to shake up London’s stock market listings regime.

It’s a fair, pragmatic point. London accounted for only 5% of IPOs, or flotations, globally between 2015 and 2020, which is a feeble performance if the post-Brexit ambition for the stock market is to rival New York, and not just deflect Amsterdam’s challenge. A few of London’s supposedly sacred governance principles were always likely to be sacrificed.

At least Hill has tried to soften the process. The least objectionable proposal is the green light for dual classes of shares. Such “golden share” structures are a governance no-no but the US, by accepting them, has dealt itself an ace card to lay in front of footloose founders of technology firms. Hill proposes a five-year limit on “golden share” structure. That is better, governance-wise, than open-ended US arrangements.

Nor should a reduction in “free floats” – the minimum proportion of shares available to outsiders – from 25% to 15% cause too much fuss. Actual liquidity, rather than percentages, is more important.

Hill’s embrace of Spacs, or “blank cheque” special purpose acquisition companies that are all the rage in the US, will rightly be more controversial. He could have taken a harder line against elaborate structures that seem designed to bypass traditional levels of scrutiny by investors. Hill recommended a Spac regime that would be stricter than Amsterdam’s. That’s not saying much.

The real disappointment, though, was the lack of a big proposal to boost the role of private retail investors in stock markets – the cause championed here yesterday. There were warm words about the importance of individual investors, and a few ideas to make IPO prospectuses more user-friendly, but the Treasury has effectively been handed the job of conducting another review to remove obstacles in front of retail participation. Maybe it will happen; maybe it won’t.

The rest of review, though, should be broadly acceptable. London needs to be in the game of attracting young and growing companies. For governance purists, it could have been worse.

Engineering a tricky sale

It’s end-of-an-era time in Wotton-under-Edge in Gloucestershire, global base of Renishaw, one of the UK’s most quietly successful engineering companies.

Sir David McMurtry and John Deer founded the maker of ultra-precise measuring devices and equipment in 1973 and now, having reached their 80s, they want to sell their stakes. Between them, they own 52% of Renishaw, a holding worth roughly £2.5bn, so the whole firm is on the block.

As you would expect (or hope), McMurtry and Deer do not wish their life’s work to end up with a carve-up merchant. They are seeking innovation-led buyers that will “respect the unique heritage and culture of the business, its commitment to the local communities in which its operations are based”.

One hopes the duo find what they are looking for, but the task does not look easy, however. At £5bn – in other words, within touching distance of the FTSE 100 index – Renishaw is not a small mouthful. It is hard to think of a British engineering company that is both big enough and would fit the bill. Rolls-Royce is valued at £9bn but is fighting fires on many fronts; in any case, while it is customer of Renishaw, this isn’t its market.

A large overseas engineering combine therefore seems the most likely buyer. That could still be honourable way to go, of course; it would depend on the buyer’s commitments to the business. But it would also feel a slightly underwhelming finale.

Furlough relief shouldn’t be budget spin

Is there anything left to reveal in the budget? We’ll find out soon enough but the Treasury’s late news on Tuesday that the furlough scheme is being extended until September would normally have qualified as a “rabbit out of the hat” announcement. An extension of only two or three months from the current April cut-off had been expected.

A longer timetable is sensible and will be welcomed, especially by small employers in sectors such as hospitality and events. But why couldn’t it have been made a month ago or six weeks ago, which was the point of greater uncertainty for firms? The obsession with budget day (and the run-up to budget day) is not healthy.

Contributor

Nils Pratley

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
London stock market review should help ordinary investors – not just tech
The government aims to encourage more technology companies to float, but wider reforms are needed

Nils Pratley

02, Mar, 2021 @7:08 AM

Article image
Darktrace shares soar by 40% on London stock market debut
British cybersecurity firm’s market value driven up from £1.7bn to almost £2.4bn

Mark Sweney

30, Apr, 2021 @2:05 PM

Article image
Cybersecurity firm Darktrace plans £3bn IPO on London Stock Exchange
British firm’s CEO Poppy Gustafsson says London was ‘natural choice’ despite Deliveroo’s disastrous debut

Mark Sweney, Kalyeena Makortoff and Alex Hern

12, Apr, 2021 @9:38 AM

Article image
Can London stock market shake off dinosaur image to boldly go?
Amid criticism over its failure to reward innovation and growth, there are signs the City is finally embracing change

Graeme Wearden

04, Jan, 2022 @8:10 AM

Article image
Dr Martens will make stock market debut at value of £3.7bn
Investor demand means famous boot brand’s IPO is eight times oversubscribed

Mark Sweney

29, Jan, 2021 @5:48 PM

Article image
London Stock Exchange hit by worst outage since 2011
Software glitch prevented investors trading for more than an hour and a half

Graeme Wearden

16, Aug, 2019 @2:46 PM

Article image
Ocado set to join FTSE 100 elite in quarterly stock market reshuffle
Retailers fare badly in rejig though Marks & Spencer hangs on ‘by the skin of its teeth’

Phillip Inman

29, May, 2018 @6:21 PM

Article image
Battersea power station fires up for London stock market listing
• Irish owners refinance and want to list the project on Aim
See our gallery of previous redevelopment plans

Julia Kollewe

23, Jun, 2010 @3:34 PM

Article image
Misys drops London IPO citing poor market conditions
Lack of investor interest kills British software firm’s plan to raise £500m from listing on stock exchange

Julia Kollewe

27, Oct, 2016 @7:49 AM

Article image
A new stock market bubble? Neil Woodford may have a point
The top fund manager’s likening of the recent run of record FTSE closes to the dotcom bubble should be noted

Nils Pratley

12, Jan, 2017 @7:31 PM