Payments firm Wise’s successful float is a relief after Deliveroo flop | Nils Pratley

Appetite for shares in the profitable money transfer outfit shows the City can bring off a big tech listing

Blink and you missed it. The UK’s biggest tech flotation happened on Wednesday to about a hundredth of the pre-publicity generated by the overhyped and undercooked Deliveroo.

Wise, formerly Transferwise, is a low-fee processor of cross-border payments and very successful – pre-tax profit doubled last year to £41m and the business is still grabbing share from sleepy banks. The reason for the relative lack of fanfare was Wise’s novel approach to joining the stock market: a direct listing in which the shares simply start trading after a three-hour auction to get the show rolling.

Wise wasn’t raising money, thus there was no need for new equity to be priced beforehand and no sure guide to what the company would be worth. It finished its first day in public form at £8.75bn, more than twice its valuation in its last private funding round last year. If Wise were eligible for inclusion in the FTSE 100 index, it would slot into a place above aero engine maker Rolls-Royce, a different sort of tech business.

It is ineligible because Kristo Käärmann, its chief executive and co-founder, insisted on giving himself enhanced voting rights, which is a no-no for a so-called “premium” listing (and thus index inclusion) until the Financial Conduct Authority changes the rules, the controversial course on which the regulator seems set. Käärmann gets a boo from governance purists for the dual-class structure but, since his 19% stake is now worth £1.65bn, he probably doesn’t care.

He gets a cheer, though, for demonstrating that appetite for high-growth, highly prized tech businesses is alive and well in London, and that Deliveroo’s float flop was not a reason for general angst. Tech comes in many forms. Wise’s valuation looks punchy but, as always seemed likely, the stock market is capable of distinguishing between a proven payments operation that moved £54bn across borders last year and a loss-making food delivery app.

Renishaw’s sellers’ principles cost them dear

It’s a tricky business, this hunt for “responsible” buyers of companies. Back in March, Sir David McMurtry and John Deer, founders of Renishaw, a quietly impressive maker of ultra-precise measuring devices, declared that, having reached their 80s, they wanted to sell up.

Since they own 52% of Renishaw between them, that meant the £4bn Gloucestershire-based company was on the block. But there was an important condition. Would-be owners would have to respect “the unique heritage and culture of the business, its commitment to the local communities in which its operations are based”.

That clause always looked a high hurdle to clear (certainly higher than the board of Morrisons, say, might insist upon). So it has proved. Four months later, the sale process has been abandoned without a deal.

McMurtry says he and Deer “enjoy good health” and have no intention of selling their shares on the open market “for the foreseeable future”. What they haven’t got, though, is a long-term plan. Gift the shares to a trust? It’s an idea, but 52% is an awkward size – the other 48% of shareholders also have rights.

Renishaw’s share price rose from £58 to £70 on the March announcement but is now at £50 as no suitable suitors have emerged. That is less than ideal for everybody. McMurtry and Deer deserve huge credit for sticking to their principles, but it’s not obvious how they will solve their conundrum.

Shell’s dividend policy is a headscratcher

Another day, another dividend policy from Shell. That’s about three since the oil company cut distributions by two-thirds when the pandemic took down the oil price.

A barrel of Brent is now back above $70, defying predictions it would be sub-$50 into the middle distance, and Shell thinks it can afford to be more generous to shareholders. Payments, either through dividends or share buybacks, will be lifted to between 20% of 30% of free cash flow.

Shell called it a case of moving to “the next phase of its capital allocation framework”, but the frame itself seems to have reset. The company will “retire” what it called “a net debt milestone of $65bn”. Nobody can grumble about the inability to predict a wild oil price, but Shell seems to be making policy on the hoof.

If it’s all intended to display confidence in the long-term returns that can be earned via low-carbon investments, that’s a good thing. But it’s hard to tell.

Contributor

Nils Pratley

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Competition regulator's grilling on banks was exquisite torture
The Competition and Markets Authority could have been far bolder in its inquiry – roll on the next one

Nils Pratley

01, Nov, 2016 @7:49 PM

Article image
Time for Shell boss to master art of renegotiation
While it would be embarrassing for Ben van Beurden to push BG Group for better terms at the 11th hour, embarrassment should not enter the equation

Nils Pratley

14, Dec, 2015 @7:25 PM

Article image
Will the TSB chief pay the price for its online banking meltdown? | Nils Pratley
It is clear that the main blame lies with parent Sabadell, but Paul Pester may end up as the fall guy

Nils Pratley

26, Apr, 2018 @6:18 PM

Article image
EDF still at table but nuclear could be critical for Osborne
The UK’s nuclear energy strategy will be in meltdown if the French pull out of Hinkley. The best guess is, they’ll find the cash

Nils Pratley

27, Jan, 2016 @7:10 PM

Article image
Shell shows prudence on dividend, but no remorse on $16bn share buybacks | Nils Pratley
As coronavirus sorts stock market winners from losers at startling speed, buybacks prove costly

Nils Pratley

30, Apr, 2020 @6:51 PM

Article image
Why is a mandatory levy on the UK’s gambling industry still a roll of the dice?
The government must force betting firms to pay heavily to treat gambling addiction – not rely on their goodwill

Nils Pratley

06, Apr, 2021 @11:01 PM

Article image
More companies risk shareholder anger over excessive pay deals
After votes against pay deals at BP and Smith & Nephew, investors are scrutinising other FTSE firms as discontent mounts

Sean Farrell and Jill Treanor

15, Apr, 2016 @6:52 PM

Article image
Post-Brexit London is open for business (no matter how grubby)
The City watchdog’s rewriting of the premium listing rules to accommodate a potential mega-listing in London of Aramco is deplorable

Nils Pratley

13, Jul, 2017 @10:57 PM

Article image
Facebook IPO: overpriced 'flop' points to regulator shambles
Rules that bar analysts from publishing during an IPO but let them talk are surely asking for trouble

Nils Pratley

23, May, 2012 @7:21 PM

Article image
The five fears stalking the global banking industry
China, emerging markets, the eurozone, oil and commodities all pose a threat to the banking sector this year

Phillip Inman and Rob Davies

10, Feb, 2016 @6:00 AM