Ocado's £200m robot deal should impress foreign supermarkets | Nils Pratley

The delivery outfit’s takeover of US firm Kindred Systems also gives it a toehold in non-grocery world

Ocado’s value improved by £1.3bn, or 8%, on Monday, an impressive gain. But one can safely say the jump wasn’t driven by the unremarkable news that the sheds and vans are still running at full capacity. The extra activity will produce £20m more profit for Ocado this year than expected in September – useful but not gamechanging.

Rather, the fizz related to the company’s other news – two acquisitions to boost “robotic manipulation capabilities”. Ocado is buying San Francisco-based Kindred Systems for $262m (£201m) and Las Vegas-based robotic arm designer Haddington Dynamics for $25m.

The former deal, the big one, looks at first glance to be highly expensive, given that the arriving revenues are forecast to be only $35m next year. But Ocado is primarily valued as a technology company these days – a seller of smart logistics to foreign supermarket chains – and anything that burnishes the cutting-edge credentials tends to go down well.

Ocado reckons it will now be able to remove a chunk of the £7m annual picking costs (ie, the cost of paying human beings) in its otherwise largely automated warehouse. Since it is building 50-odd such sheds around the world for companies such as Kroger in the US and Groupe Casino in France, the savings could add up to a serious sum.

Then there’s the interesting angle that Kindred Systems, whose clients include clothing chains Gap and American Eagle, gives Ocado a toehold in the non-grocery world. Sorting parcels for postal services could be another area for expansion.

A whiff of mission-creep into non-food might normally make investors nervous. In this case, Ocado probably has a free pass. Investing in robots suddenly seems low risk – at least compared with paying rent on a bricks and mortar shop that can be closed almost overnight.

A mini-acquisition spree, if that’s what is now in prospect, won’t make Ocado’s financials any easier to understand. And the criticism that the company is better at spending money than returning any to shareholders will be strengthened. But, in chief executive Tim Steiner’s shoes, you’d keep going: it’s hard to see any real downside in adding clever American robots to Ocado’s own creations.

Serco will come through end of atomic weapons contract

Given the volume of coverage, you’d be forgiven for thinking that Serco’s controversial work on NHS test and trace is its main line of business. It’s anything but. In commercial terms, a few pandemic projects are nice to have but they’re only add-ons.

Far more important are long-standing contracts such as the one at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), where Serco since 2000 has been a 24.5% shareholder in a consortium managing the nuclear warheads facility.

That arrangement, though, will end next June. AWE, which includes the Aldermaston site in Berkshire, is being nationalised in effect. It will become an arm’s-length body wholly owned by the Ministry of Defence.

Shares in Serco fell 13% and, on the pure financials, one can understand why. The US group Lockheed Martin may be the main player at AWE with a 51% stake, but the set-up is still worth £17m in profit this year to Serco.

But, actually, it would have been more surprising if the privatised arrangement had been allowed to run. A National Audit Office report was damning about the MoD’s failures – everything from “limited contractual levers” to “insufficient oversight” to an inability to learn from mistakes. Life was too comfortable for the contractors, in other words.

A complete overhaul seemed likely from the moment the NAO published its findings. Serco and its investors cannot be truly shocked, especially as the UK is investing in a replacement warhead programme, creating a good moment for the MoD to change tack.

Serco will live – government contracts always come and go. The only small consolation (which is really no consolation) is that, in a roundabout way, Serco has shown that the test and trace contract was not a transformative moment. No compensation is due from the MoD and the company’s share price is now lower than it was in January.

Ryanair should reimburse locked-down passengers

One can see Michael O’Leary’s point, of course: if the flight will still take off, why should Ryanair pay compensation to a locked-down passenger who is no longer able to fly?

Come on, though, a sense of fair play says Ryanair should offer a refund in these circumstances, rather than a transfer to a post-lockdown flight. O’Leary can rant, rightly, about the government’s management failings. But he’s not speaking from the moral high ground.

Contributor

Nils Pratley

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Ocado looks to ‘kerb to kitchen’ robot deliveries in £10m Oxbotica deal
Online grocer strikes commercial partnership with Oxford-based self-driving vehicles company

Mark Sweney and Zoe Wood

16, Apr, 2021 @8:10 AM

Article image
Hand delivered: will Ocado's robot soon be picking your shopping?
Online retailer trials arm that can select fruit and vegetables without damaging them – but says it will still need humans

Sarah Butler

31, Jan, 2017 @1:49 PM

Article image
Refunds rather than insults would serve Ryanair boss well | Nils Pratley
Michael O’Leary’s rants won’t cut much ice with the EU or UK. A more constructive approach to the coronavirus crisis probably will

Nils Pratley

18, May, 2020 @6:34 PM

Article image
Which big names in business are 2018’s ones to watch?
Can Nicky Morgan avoid a ‘no deal’ Brexit? Can Michael O’Leary keep Ryanair aloft? And will Jeff Bezos stay the world’s richest man?

Simon Goodley

28, Dec, 2017 @1:05 PM

Article image
The lesson to learn from Co-op Bank? Regulation, regulation, regulation
It was absurd that the FSA did not insist the Co-op Bank have a chairman who knew something about banking

Nils Pratley

22, Nov, 2013 @10:16 PM

Article image
Ryanair boss Michael O’Leary may be flying by the seat of his pants in row with pilots | Nils Pratley
It makes doubtful sense for Michael O’Leary to patronise and alienate his pilots, who may get their own back by joining a union

Nils Pratley

21, Sep, 2017 @5:43 PM

Article image
Major shareholder’s Rolls-Royce grumble could rumble on
Vague demand for board refresh from Causeway likely a hangover from £2bn rights issue

Nils Pratley

31, Aug, 2021 @6:41 PM

Article image
'Billionaire spiv' debate about Sir Philip Green was entertaining but absurd | Nils Pratley
The former BHS owner had done little to deserve a knighthood in the first place so MPs’ outrage over his conduct seemed naive

Nils Pratley

20, Oct, 2016 @8:15 PM

Article image
Ryanair's defence of O'Leary's €99m bonus target doesn't wash | Nils Pratley
The airline’s boss will win a colossal jackpot merely for getting the share price to roughly what it was in 2017

Nils Pratley

19, Sep, 2019 @6:59 PM

Article image
Rupert Murdoch succession: reshuffle does nothing to clear up who's boss
New titles for James and Lachlan Murdoch leave doubts as to who will really lead 21st Century Fox – but brothers’ double act may hasten change in voting power

Nils Pratley

11, Jun, 2015 @6:55 PM