Hong Kong stock exchange bid for LSE was least credible of the lot | Nils Pratley

Shortcomings in failed £32bn approach were evident from the outset

Blink and you missed it. The Hong Kong stock exchange’s attempt to buy its London counterpart must rank as the most feeble “hostile” bid seen in years. The £32bn approach looked flawed at the outset, was quickly rejected by the London Stock Exchange and has now been dropped a month later.

Trying to justify the failed expedition, Charles Li, the chief executive of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing (HKEX), cited a line he attributed to Lewis Carroll in a blogpost: “We only regret the chances we didn’t take.” He would have been closer to the mark if he had said his offer required the LSE’s board and shareholders to imitate the White Queen and believe six impossible things before breakfast.

The shortcomings in the proposal included: the mostly-shares structure; the need for about a year of regulatory scrutiny; the less-than-generous price; and the demand the LSE abandoned its popular (rightly or wrongly) $27bn (£22bn) purchase of the data group Refinitiv. Then there were the obvious Hong Kong problems – street protests, with no end in sight, and the fact that half of the board of HKEX was appointed by a government that is prodded from Beijing.

The fear of direct interference from China may explain why HKEX wanted to derisk its business but it was surely hopeless to think the LSE’s board could be wooed with loose lines about capturing east-west capital flows. Since it is virtually impossible to complete the takeover of a major stock exchange without backing from the target’s board, the proposal was always vulnerable to an instant rebuff.

Li and HKEX declared themselves “disappointed” by the outcome, but cannot be surprised. In the long list of failed bidders for the LSE, Hong Kong, in the current climate, was the least credible of the lot.

U-turn needed over Barclays post office blunder

It takes a lot to rouse the Payment Systems Regulator, one of our more obscure financial watchdogs, to anger, but Barclays has managed it. Indeed, the bank has needlessly annoyed a lot of people in one hit: Which?; Rachel Reeves, the chair of business select committee; and Martin Lewis, supposedly the most trusted man in Britain.

Post office branch.
Barclays provoked an outcry by stopping free over-the-counter cash withdrawals at post office branches. Photograph: Lucy Ray/PA

Barclays’ own goal was to scrap free over-the-counter cash withdrawals at post offices. Some 28 other banks have renewed a deal to offer this service – but Barclays is a refusenik. Its customers can use other services at post offices, but not the one that provokes most passion in the debate about banks’ responsibilities to customers and society.

The hardball policy probably did not reach the desk of its chief executive, Jes Staley, but the boss would be wise to pay attention now. Paying out fat bonuses to investment bankers while whacking the Post Office is a terrible look. If smaller rivals can bear the cost of offering a full service, so can Barclays. A U-turn is required – and quickly.

Lundgren’s reticence reasonable amid Brexit uncertainty

Investors are still struggling to price Brexit risks. Shares in the recruitment companies PageGroup and Robert Walters slid on profits warnings that should not have been seen as out-of-left-field developments. Business investment is weak and Brexit is a major factor. It was reasonable to assume that recruitment, notoriously sensitive to every twitch in the economy, was bound to be affected.

Over at easyJet, where the shares fell 7.5%, the problem could be described as a Brexit vacuum. There was no issue with predicted numbers for the financial year that ended in September: at £420m-£430m, pre-tax profits will arrive marginally better than some forecasts, thanks to help from strikes at Ryanair and British Airways. Instead, the stock market took fright at a refusal by the chief executive, Johan Lundgren, to predict the airline’s financial performance in 2020. All he would say was that forward bookings for the first quarter were “in line with the same time last year”.

EasyJet bosses are traditionally more vocal at this point in the year but, in Lundgren’s shoes, reticence is reasonable. There are too many Brexit variables. The biggest, in terms of potential to wreck profits, may be the risk of disruption and delay at airports. Since easyJet has no greater insight into that risk than anybody else, best to say nothing. Investors will have to get used to flying solo: companies can’t read events outside their control.

Contributor

Nils Pratley

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
EasyJet's axe-wielding smacks of opportunism | Nils Pratley
Laying off ‘up to 30%’ of the workforce seems extreme if we all start flying again

Nils Pratley

28, May, 2020 @6:07 PM

Article image
Hong Kong stock exchange's bid for LSE deserves to fail
HKEX will struggle to win backing from regulators, shareholders and politicians

Nils Pratley

11, Sep, 2019 @6:38 PM

Article image
London Stock Exchange rejects approach by Hong Kong counterpart
‘Fundamental flaws’ in £32bn takeover proposal mean LSE board sees no merit in it

Simon Goodley

13, Sep, 2019 @1:33 PM

Article image
EasyJet should navigate financial pressures, but clouds haven't cleared yet
Even if there’s delayed take-off for Covid vaccines, the budget airline has options

Nils Pratley

17, Nov, 2020 @7:59 PM

Article image
Strong support for cutting UK stock market trading hours, says LSE
Majority agree move would improve gender diversity and mental health, consultation finds

Kalyeena Makortoff Banking correspondent

01, Jun, 2020 @4:47 PM

Article image
The speedy stock market rally has been extreme, but may not last
Recovery has brought some spectacular short-term gains but coronavirus crisis is not over yet

Nils Pratley

09, Jun, 2020 @6:00 PM

Article image
Stock exchange merger is now caught in the Brexit crossfire
Before the vote to leave the EU, the pitch from the London Stock Exchange and Deutsche Börse was straightforward, almost compelling

Nils Pratley

12, Sep, 2016 @6:05 PM

Article image
Is the NHS being taken for a ride on drug prices? We need to know | Nils Pratley
The competition watchdog is investigating, but we need a wider inquiry into pharmaceutical firms’ practices

Nils Pratley

22, Nov, 2017 @6:45 AM

Article image
Theresa May must block London Stock Exchange bids until after Brexit | Nils Pratley
The LSE/Deutsche Börse merger was doomed – the UK’s vote to leave the EU only piled confusion upon uncertainty

Nils Pratley

27, Feb, 2017 @7:32 PM

Article image
Hong Kong stock exchange makes £32bn bid for London counterpart
Proposal to LSE board will only proceed if deal for Refinitiv is terminated or voted down

Mark Sweney

11, Sep, 2019 @9:25 AM