Bank's olive branch increases chance of Brexit deal City can live with

Bank of England casts itself as model of reasonableness in allowing EU banks to continue operating in UK

Smart move by the Bank of England. While Michel Barnier, the European Union’s chief Brexit negotiator, is warning about UK banks losing their passporting rights to operate in the single market, Threadneedle Street is trying to position itself as a model of sweet reasonableness. All being well, EU investment banks operating in the City will be able to carry on after Brexit almost as if nothing has changed.

EU wholesale banks will still have to fill out a form shifting the status of their current UK branches from “passported” to “authorised,” but the process sounds straightforward. The Bank doesn’t want to be heavy handed and insist that EU banks’ lightly regulated branches in the UK are changed into subsidiaries, which are costlier to operate since capital has to be ringfenced.

The one big condition is that the Bank assumes “an appropriate degree of supervisory cooperation” from EU countries and regulators. If the Brexit negotiations turn out horribly, expensive subsidiaries will be back on the table.

Is this a case of the Bank taking the moral high ground, or is it just acting in the UK’s interests? Actually, both.

Self-interest lies in the fact the City’s chief attraction is its openness to global capital. At this stage in the negotiations, it would be absurd to tell EU wholesale banks that they will be treated more harshly than counterparts from the US, Japan and Switzerland, all of which are allowed to operate branches in the UK. And it would even sillier to tell EU banks to erect subsidiaries, just in case, and then, if the Brexit negotiations proceed happily, allow them to dismantle their new vehicles. That would waste everybody’s time.

The moral high ground factor is this: the Bank is saying it wants to cooperate with EU regulators on data-sharing and supervision and so on, and is inviting a return in kind. This carrot comes with a stick, naturally. Carney, in front of the Treasury select committee, repeated his line about the UK being “the banker for Europe”, meaning there are cost benefits for EU companies and governments in having bond-clearing, equity-underwriting and currency-trading concentrated in London.

What happens if EU negotiators and politicians decide the UK’s stance is weak, as opposed to cooperative? What if they would be rather clobber the City and create rival financial centres in Frankfurt, Paris, Dublin and Luxembourg? What if technical squabbles – over the EU cap on bankers’ bonuses, for example – are inflated into deal-breakers that make even loose agreement on regulatory equivalence impossible?

At that point, all bets would be off. But, from a negotiating perspective, the Bank’s position on “branch status” is surely correct. Start by assuming cooperation and openness, and advertise the advantages of keeping things orderly.

The strategy certainly doesn’t guarantee a free-trade deal that includes financial services – far from it, given Barnier’s comments – but it costs nothing at the outset and increases the chances of getting arrangements the City can live with. If the Bank had a free hand, we would probably have seen Wednesday’s announcement six months ago. Our technocrats are better at this stuff than the politicians.

It ain’t how it used to be for BT

Here’s another sign that BT’s standing with government is falling fast. Only a few months ago, ministers’ big idea to get fast broadband to 1.1m hard-to-reach homes in rural areas was to put BT’s Openreach subsidiary on the job. This, supposedly, was quickest way to deliver a Tory manifesto pledge. The company submitted its proposal and all seemed set fair.

Now BT’s plans have been rejected. Instead, the government will create a legal right for consumers to request a decent broadband connection, defined as 10Mbps or better, by 2020.

Matt Hancock, minister for digital policy, did a terrible job of explaining on the Today programme who customers are supposed to make their demands to, and how the funding mechanism for this new universal service obligation will work. One assumes those details will follow. The main point is that government clearly wants to get other providers into the market. Over-dependence on BT and Openreach is seen as dangerous for the economy.

You can see the same process at the regulator, Ofcom. The chief executive, Sharon White, made a stinging speech this month that called on BT to “act in the interest of all of its customers who rely on it, as well as its shareholders” when rolling out full-fibre broadband. She sounded more impressed by the efforts of Virgin Media and Vodafone, and more convinced that real competition in full-fibre is materialising.

BT, and its new chairman Jan du Plessis, have a problem: the company’s lobbying power is not what it used to be.


Nils Pratley

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
High cost of more delay forced TSB to upgrade before it was ready | Nils Pratley
Using former owner Lloyds’ IT system was proving ruinously expensive for the bank

Nils Pratley

24, Apr, 2018 @6:03 PM

Article image
Bank of England calls for clear heads to avoid no-deal mayhem | Nils Pratley
EU will be big loser if agreement not reached for UK clearers to handle £69tn derivatives market

Nils Pratley

09, Oct, 2018 @6:24 PM

Article image
Time running short for deal on financial contracts before Brexit
Financial markets will be left in the dark if the UK makes a cliff-edge exit from the EU

Nils Pratley

09, Aug, 2018 @5:55 PM

Article image
Government should use its new powers to block a BT takeover bid
A Patrick Drahi buyout would be an unhelpful distraction for a company in midst of fibre rollout

Nils Pratley

14, Dec, 2021 @7:15 PM

Article image
BT deserves credit – clawing back boss's bonus is common sense | Nils Pratley
It would have been outrageous for Gavin Patterson to get rewarded after BT’s Italian scandal and a big fine for overcharging

Nils Pratley

12, May, 2017 @6:44 AM

Article image
So just when, exactly, will the City press the no-deal panic button? | Nils Pratley
Given the ever-ticking Brexit clock, the air of complacency in the markets is extraordinary

Nils Pratley

30, Jan, 2019 @8:00 PM

Article image
Bank of England deputy's Brexit warning is strong stuff | Nils Pratley
Sam Woods has spelled out clearly why a transition period is needed for financial services – and showed it would make the process cheaper

Nils Pratley

09, Aug, 2017 @5:47 AM

Article image
No-deal Brexit: markets brace for big hit to UK company shares and sterling
Analysts warn if talks end on Sunday without agreement it could trigger a large sell-off

Richard Partington

11, Dec, 2020 @6:13 PM

Article image
Is the EU trying to undermine the City over Brexit? | Nils Pratley
Or does EBA truly believe it’s up to banks and insurers to prepare themselves for all outcomes?

Nils Pratley

27, Jun, 2018 @6:33 PM

Article image
'Significant' risk to UK firms if passporting rights lost after Brexit
Treasury publishes FCA data showing over 8,000 companies authorised in other EU states use these rules to do business in UK

Jill Treanor

20, Sep, 2016 @12:20 PM