Boring can be good. How modest Clement Attlee’s unflashy ideas changed Britain

Attlee was a gifted manager, who showed it possible for modest politicians to be successful if they have decent ideas

Winston Churchill once described Clement Attlee as a modest man with much to be modest about – and up to a point he was right. Attlee was in many ways the epitome of bourgeois respectability: he was privately educated, had a house in the London suburbs and liked nothing better than to occupy his spare time by cracking the Times crossword or catching up on the cricket scores.

Yet in 1945, the British public chose the modest man over the wartime hero, and Attlee showed over the next six years that a politician does not have to be charismatic to be effective. A modest man turned out to be one of the few UK prime ministers of the 20th century who actually changed Britain.

That was a different time, of course, before 24/7 news, trial by Twitter and the political obsession with keeping control of the news agenda on a daily basis. Attlee found being interviewed by TV – then relatively new-fangled as far as politicians were concerned – something of a trial. He didn’t crave the limelight.

From left: Clement Attlee, Harry S Truman, and Joseph Stalin – the ‘Big Three’ at the final meeting at Potsdam. In the rear, from left: Admiral Leahy, Truman’s chief of staff; Ernest Bevin, UK foreign minister; US secretary of state James Byrnes; and Russian foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov.
From left: Clement Attlee, Harry S Truman, and Joseph Stalin – the ‘Big Three’ at the final meeting at Potsdam. In the rear, from left: Admiral Leahy, Truman’s chief of staff; Ernest Bevin, UK foreign minister; US secretary of state James Byrnes; and Russian foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov. Photograph: Bettmann/Bettmann Archive

Today, Attlee would find it harder to hide his light under a bushel. Politicians are expected to be bursting with new initiatives while also being the sort of person with whom the average voter would choose to have a drink in the pub. Modesty doesn’t cut it, because modesty means boring, and there are few greater sins for the modern politician than that. No doubt Attlee would be forced to have an image makeover and extensive media training were he still around today.

Actually, though, boring politicians are much needed. Good government does not mean a constant stream of policy announcements that are never followed through on. The problems of the UK – and indeed the broader developed world – are deep-rooted and structural.

To take one example, the latest monetary policy report from the Bank of England contains a special chapter on how recent shocks – Brexit, Covid-19 and rocketing energy prices – affected the potential supply of the economy.

Potential supply is exactly the sort of subject designed to make eyes glaze over, but it matters because, as far as the Bank of England is considered, it acts like a speed limit on growth. In the 10 years leading up to the global financial crisis in 2007, potential supply increased at an annual rate of 2.7%, which meant the economy could grow at that rate and still hit the government’s 2% inflation target. In the decade from 2010-19, potential supply grew more slowly – at 1.7% a year. In the three years from 2023 to 2025 it is expected to grow by just under 1%.

Clement Attlee at 10 Downing Street in 1947.
Clement Attlee at 10 Downing Street in 1947. Photograph: PA

These are profoundly worrying developments. One reason for the recent slowdown is that labour supply has grown more slowly, mainly due to an ageing population but also as the result of people giving up work as a result of the pandemic. Some EU workers also returned home during lockdowns and have never returned.

Labour supply may recover a bit as pandemic effects fade. A much more significant issue is that productivity growth – the other component of potential supply – slumped during the financial crisis and has never recovered. In the 1997-2007 decade, productivity growth averaged 2% a year; in the subsequent decade it averaged 0.5%.

If there was an easy or quick way to reverse the slowdown in productivity or to boost potential supply, then politicians might have been expected to find it by now. The solution involves much more than keeping inflation low, helpful though that is. It also means investment in skills and training, tax incentives to invest, higher spending on infrastructure, improved management skills, pension arrangements that encourage people to work longer, a big push on innovation, and much more.

The UK has rarely been good at sorting out the supply side of the economy. Rather, it has tended to think the answer is a quick fix designed to boost demand. The current pressure on Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt from MPs on the right of the Conservative party to cut taxes in next month’s budget is a classic case of this.

Qttlee’s 1945 Labour government founded the NHS. Here health minister Aneurin Bevan visits a hospital in Lancashire.
Qttlee’s 1945 Labour government founded the NHS. Here health minister Aneurin Bevan visits a hospital in Lancashire. Photograph: Trinity Mirror/Mirrorpix/Alamy

The fact that the past three years has experienced a series of shocks – the pandemic in 2020, the supply-chain bottlenecks in 2021, the war in 2022 – clearly hasn’t helped foster long-term thinking, but it is no real excuse. As Tim Harford wrote in a recent Financial Times piece: “For such a venerable polity, we have developed a shocking inability to think beyond the next few weeks.”

Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer are both criticised for being boring, but is that really how we want to judge them? The test should not be whether they put up a good performance when being grilled by Piers Morgan but whether their ideas pass muster and whether those ideas can be turned into workable policies. Good management has tended to be an under-rated skill in the UK, a country that has – with predictably poor results – favoured the gifted amateur over the professional. Interestingly, it was one of Attlee’s gifts.

The prime minister and the leader of the opposition have a similar problem. In an age of instant gratification, both are seeking to portray themselves as unflashy and solidly professional. As Attlee showed, it is possible for a politician to be successful as well as modest but only if they have decent ideas as well. So far, neither Sunak nor Starmer has convinced voters they have the ideas to marry with the avowed competence.

Yet there are no short cuts when it comes to raising productivity or tackling the UK’s chronically weak investment. What’s needed is sound analysis, an action plan, and plenty of perseverance. That may sound boring, but boring can be good.


Larry Elliott

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
No matter their differences, Starmer and Sunak face the same obstacle | Larry Elliott
Whether it’s Labour plan for renewal or the Tory path to recovery, both remain hostage to circumstance in 2023

Larry Elliott Economics Editor

08, Jan, 2023 @11:17 AM

Article image
Rishi Sunak and the Treasury need to think big and plan long term
The budget showed how strategic planning and investment loses out to quick fixes. A department for the economy is urgently needed

Larry Elliott

07, Mar, 2021 @11:48 AM

Article image
We know little about the real Rishi Sunak … but that may change this week
It is time for the Tory chancellor to stand up – and there’s no better opportunity than the Mais lecture

Larry Elliott

20, Feb, 2022 @11:57 AM

Article image
UK workforce exodus could force BoE to raise interest rates, says chief economist
Departure of more than 500,000 workers since Covid risks stoking inflation, says Huw Pill

Richard Partington Economics correspondent

23, Nov, 2022 @6:21 PM

Article image
Cost of living crisis: Rishi Sunak must at the very least raise UK benefits
One in three Britons will be unable to afford the cost of living this year – help is needed now for the worst off

Richard Partington

10, Apr, 2022 @11:41 AM

Article image
In 2022 Liz Truss tried to bin economic orthodoxy – but what is it?
Rishi Sunak soon rowed back from his predecessor’s chaotic experiment, reasserting the seven pillars of UK Treasury wisdom

Larry Elliott Economics editor

27, Dec, 2022 @3:00 PM

Article image
Five charts that will shape Jeremy Hunt’s budget
From cooling inflation to easing staff shortages, we look at the factors behind the chancellor’s spending choices

Richard Partington Economics correspondent

15, Mar, 2023 @6:00 AM

Article image
Boris Johnson has left the UK economy in a parlous state
Analysis: If Johnsonomics stands for anything, it is a lack of plan or vision to address Britain’s economic woes

Richard Partington Economics correspondent

08, Jul, 2022 @3:39 PM

Article image
Hunt budget being overshadowed by Lineker row is no bad thing for chancellor | Larry Elliott
Wednesday’s announcement will not change big picture for UK economy

Larry Elliott

12, Mar, 2023 @12:20 PM

Article image
Inflation warnings presume the Covid crisis is over … sadly it isn’t
Pent-up demand is temporary and the prospect of a third wave, with all its economic havoc, is very real

Richard Partington

13, Jun, 2021 @11:06 AM