Oil firms have internally dismissed swift climate action, House panel says

Documents show the fossil fuel industry ‘has no real plans to clean up its act’ and took steps to continue business as usual

Some of the world’s largest oil and gas companies have internally dismissed the need to swiftly move to renewable energy and cut planet-heating emissions, despite publicly portraying themselves as concerned about the climate crisis, a US House of Representatives committee has found.

Documents obtained from companies including Exxon, Shell, BP and Chevron show that the fossil fuel industry “has no real plans to clean up its act and is barreling ahead with plans to pump more dirty fuels for decades to come”, said Carolyn Maloney, the chair of the House oversight committee, which has investigated the sector for the past year.

The committee accused the oil firms of a “long-running greenwashing campaign” by committing to major new projects to extract and burn fossil fuels despite espousing their efforts to go green.

In reality, executives, the documents show, were derisive of the need to cut emissions, disparaged climate activists and worked to secure US government tax credits for carbon capture projects that would allow them to continue business as usual. Maloney, a Democrat, said that “these companies know their climate pledges are inadequate, but are prioritizing big oil’s record profits over the human costs of climate change”.

Ro Khanna, another Democrat who sits on the committee, said that the industry’s approach was one of “intimidation” towards critics, as part of a “cynical strategy” to avoid acting on the climate emergency. He added that the committee will pass on the documents to “other entities”, raising the possibility of charges laid by the US Department of Justice.

Khanna rejected allegations from Republicans that the Democrat-led committee had engaged in a sort of corporate witch-hunt. “The industry was the one out there continuing to make false statements about climate change and climate legislation,” he said. “Our goal is to get them to stop engaging in climate misinformation.”

Several of the company executives appeared before the committee, where they faced accusations their companies knew of the dangers of the climate crisis for decades, only to hide this from the public. Darren Woods, chief executive of Exxon, said last year that his company’s claims over climate change were “consistent with science” at the time.

“Oil and gas will continue to be necessary for the foreseeable future,” Woods added in his testimony to the committee. “We currently do not have the adequate alternative energy sources.”

Exxon, like most other large oil firms, has said it backs the Paris climate accords, where governments agreed to not allow the global temperature to rise 1.5C or more above pre-industrial times to help avoid worsening heatwaves, droughts, floods and other disastrous impacts.

Privately, however, these companies downplayed any need to scale down their fossil fuel activity and even plan to ramp it up, the committee found.

Internal documents from BP in 2017 show that the company intends to “significantly increase development in regions with oil potential” and to focus primarily on projects in current basins that generate the highest rate of return”.

One BP executive subsequently asserted in an internal email that the company had “no obligation to minimize GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions”, while another admitted that any of its divestments of fossil fuels “may not directly lead to a reduction in absolute global emissions”.

Industry insiders communicated with Exxon consultants about doubts over the veracity of climate science, the documents show, while a strategy slide presented to the Chevron board by its chief executive, Mike Wirth, states that the company is to “continue to invest” in fossil fuels even if others retreat from oil and gas.

A Shell tweet posted in 2020 asking others what they could do to reduce emissions resulted in a torrent of ridicule from Twitter users. A communications executive for the company wrote privately that criticism that the tweet was “gaslighting” the public was “not totally without merit” and that the tweet was “pretty tone deaf”. He added: “We are, after all, in a tweet like this implying others need to sacrifice without focusing on ourselves.”

The UK-headquartered oil company also poured scorn on climate activists, with a communications specialist at the company emailing in 2019 that he wished “bedbugs” upon the Sunrise Movement, a youth-led US climate group.

Climate campaigners said the committee’s work showed that the fossil fuel industry was continuing to lie over global heating by pretending to act on the issue.

“The key revelation in this report is that big oil has no intention of actually following through on its climate commitments,” said Jamie Henn, director of Fossil Free Media.

“It isn’t transitioning to clean energy, it’s doubling down on methane gas, and it’s actively lobbying against renewable energy solutions. This is the big tobacco playbook all over again: pretend you care about a problem, but continue your deadly business as usual.”


Oliver Milman

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Exxon CEO accused of lying about climate science to congressional panel
Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney likens oil company bosses’ responses to those of tobacco industry at historic hearing

Chris McGreal

28, Oct, 2021 @9:05 PM

Article image
Fossil fuel subsidies are a ‘disgrace’, Greta Thunberg tells US House panel
Climate activist asked to speak at hearing as part of push by Democrats to include fossil fuel subsidy elimination in bill

Oliver Milman

22, Apr, 2021 @6:45 PM

Article image
Republicans are making noises on climate action. Some say it's just greenwashing
Bills to meet environmental targets while feeding industry have the right pushing back and experts unconvinced

Emily Holden in Washington

02, Mar, 2020 @7:00 AM

Article image
Progressive lawmakers call for climate change revolution
Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez emphasized the need to ‘transform our energy system’ but did not discuss how to pursue it

Emily Holden in Washington

04, Dec, 2018 @1:03 PM

Article image
‘No more time to waste,’ chair of House climate panel warns ahead of Cop26
Democrat Kathy Castor warns that even Biden’s ambitious Build Back Better bill ‘doesn’t really get us to net zero by 2050’

Lauren Gambino in Washington

21, Oct, 2021 @7:00 AM

Article image
House Capitol attack panel ready to urge prosecution of Trump aides, says Schiff
Mark Meadows, Dan Scavino, Steve Bannon and Kash Patel all defying subpoenas under instruction from Trump

Martin Pengelly in New York

10, Oct, 2021 @4:41 PM

Article image
Exxon sowed doubt about climate crisis, House Democrats hear in testimony
Subcommittee laid out four decades of evidence just a day after oil behemoth began a trial over misleading investors

Emily Holden in Washington

23, Oct, 2019 @5:43 PM

Article image
House panel demands White House turn over Kushner documents – as it happened
White House given deadline of Monday to comply with committee’s request after reports Trump ordered security clearance for Kushner

Gabrielle Canon in Oakland (now) and Sabrina Siddiqui and Adam Gabbatt in Washington (earlier)

02, Mar, 2019 @1:25 AM

Article image
Lisa Jackson's legacy at the Environmental Protection Agency | Richard Schiffman

Richard Schiffman: The lauded EPA chief departs an agency that has reasserted its regulatory authority. But her successor faces major challenges

Richard Schiffman

01, Jan, 2013 @6:04 PM

Article image
Joe Manchin leads opposition to Biden’s climate bill, backed by support from oil, gas and coal
West Virginia senator objects to bill that would steadily retire the coal industry which continues to provide ample financial support to him

Oliver Milman

20, Oct, 2021 @10:00 AM