Banks failing to comply with anti-corruption rules and sanctions lists

Officials named on Magnitsky lists as well as criminals can easily access global finance systems, study finds

Criminals including terrorists and tax evaders, as well as government officials subject to sanctions, can easily breach regulations meant to bar them from the international finance system, a study has found.

Banks and other financial firms around the world, including in the UK, are failing to comply with international anti-corruption rules, according to research by the University of Cambridge and the University of Texas at Austin.

The researchers emailed 5,000 banks and 7,000 other financial intermediaries in 273 countries and financial jurisdictions in 2020-21 to test compliance with rules meant to combat money laundering; the financing of terrorism; tax evasion; and Magnitsky Act legislation that allows sanctions to be imposed against specified Russian government officials.

The study found one in 30 banks did not comply with international regulations, increasing to one in 10 if discounting those that did not respond to the researchers’ emails. The results for the Magnitsky sanctions test found one in 20 companies did not comply, rising to one in-six if discounting non-responses.

The researchers set up 12 shell companies in countries recognised as a low risk for corruption including the UK and the US, and a high risk including Papua New Guinea and Pakistan, as well as in offshore jurisdictions, such as the British Virgin Islands. They then posed as representatives of those companies and sought to open bank accounts for them.

They also impersonated individuals from high-risk countries, including several Russians named on Magnitsky sanctions lists, then asked intermediary firms to set up shell companies on their behalf to limit liability, save tax and maintain their privacy. They also asked what, if any, documents would be required to verify their identity.

The research found people named on the Magnitsky lists could gain access to the financial system and evade the rules almost as easily as low-risk individuals, suggesting the sanctions were ineffective.

Jason Sharman, a professor of international relations at Cambridge, said: “It will take you one day to break these sanctions. You don’t have to break a sweat too much to send out 20 emails. And this is without hiding your identity as a high-risk individual. So even when the bad guys are incredibly obvious, incredibly stupid and open, this is still a proposition.”

The researchers said some of the individual responses to their emails indicated not just indifference to the regulations but a willingness to conspire with high-risk customers to break the rules by hiding the identity of the client from banks and the authorities.

In one response, a company representative explained how they could help a purported Russian client avoid Magnitsky sanctions by setting up a “shelf company”. These are firms that have already been set up, with a nominee director and nominee shareholder, so it appears to a bank they were established by someone other than the beneficial owner.

The researchers concluded that anti-money laundering rules and Magnitsky sanctions do not work because banks and intermediary corporate service provider firms “completely fail to discriminate between low- and extremely high-risk customers [which] is exactly the opposite of what the rules say should happen.

“Even just restricting the results to countries with Magnitsky legislation [the US, UK, Canada and European Union member states] … the same lack of sensitivity in the face of an obvious and extreme risk profile still holds.”

The researchers repeated their research this year, after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and this time they found they were far less likely to receive a response using names on sanctions lists. However, there was little difference in compliance between firms in countries with Magnitsky laws and those without such legislation. The study concluded: “The effectiveness of these sanctions is a product of war rather than law.”

Sharman added: “Until the war starts, these incredibly high-risk people get treated exactly the same as Joe Bloggs, they are not getting scrutiny.”

The anti-corruption campaigner Bill Browder, who lobbied for the Magnitsky Act in the US, said: “The results of his investigation are a microcosm of everything that’s gone wrong – that western enablers were actively helping the Putin regime launder their money without any restraint or consequence.

“The reason why these company formation agents are so confident in flouting the rules is because they know that nothing will happen to them.”


David Batty

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Sanctions must be extended to all Russian banks, says Liz Truss
UK foreign secretary issues statement after some Russian banks were omitted from Swift expulsion

Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor

03, Mar, 2022 @12:18 PM

Article image
Russian sanctions: who has been hit and who might be next?
From Rosneft to Gazprom and En+ Group, most significant London-listed firms potentially face sanctions

Jasper Jolly

22, Feb, 2022 @1:54 PM

Article image
EU and US sanctions against Russia: which will they hurt more?
Sanctions more sweeping than previous ones, and target whole sections of Russian economy – not just individuals and firms

Angela Monaghan and Jennifer Rankin

30, Jul, 2014 @4:01 PM

Article image
Cyprus banks remain closed to prevent run on deposits
Planned opening of Bank of Cyprus and Laiki delayed for at least two days to ensure the whole system functions 'smoothly'

Josephine Moulds, Helena Smith in Nicosia, Ian Traynor in Brussels, Miriam Elder and Jill Treanor

26, Mar, 2013 @11:35 AM

Article image
British MPs urge global banks to close Russian offices ‘without delay’
Labour’s Margaret Hodge says banks including Deutsche Bank, HSBC, JP Morgan and Credit Suisse have ‘moral duty’ to exit quickly

Kalyeena Makortoff Banking correspondent

06, Mar, 2022 @3:15 PM

Article image
Russia: who is on the sanctions lists – at a glance
List of people and organisations blacklisted by UK, US and EU

Sarah Butler and Rupert Neate in London, Daniel Boffey in Brussels, and Dominic Rushe in New York

01, Mar, 2022 @5:52 PM

Article image
No 10 pressured me to drop anti-money laundering measures, says ex-minister
UK ‘laughing stock’ for failure to stem ‘dirty money’, says Lord Faulks QC, who was told to drop register by Theresa May’s No 10

Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor

15, Feb, 2022 @11:00 AM

Article image
Banks failing to carry out anti-bribery measures, says FSA
City watchdog finds most banks haven't done anti-corruption audit and managers' knowledge of corruption laws poor

Rupert Neate

29, Mar, 2012 @6:52 PM

Article image
BlackRock to advise EU on environmental rules for banks
Campaigners raise concerns over investor’s financial interests in fossil fuel companies

Jasper Jolly

12, Apr, 2020 @1:50 PM

Basel III rules will force banks to hold more capital
Banks will have raise billions of euros in fresh capital under regulations to prevent repeat financial crisis

Graeme Wearden

12, Sep, 2010 @6:47 PM