Austerity deaths were foreseeable and foreseen | Letters

Readers respond to a report revealing the highly predicable consequences of savage public service cuts over many years, and the effects of widening inequality

You report on a study by the University of York into the first five years of the coalition government’s “age of austerity” (Austerity in England linked to more than 50,000 extra deaths in five years, 14 October). The real scandal is that the results were in general foreseeable, and nothing was done nationally to mitigate them.

At a local level, the London borough of Lewisham decided to theme its annual public health report for 2011-12 on the effects of the economic downturn and austerity on the health of its population.

I researched and wrote a section of the report, drawing entirely on published research and freely available data and analyses. We predicted increased mortality, more suicides, more winter deaths, lower life expectancy, high rates of mental health problems, and serious problems arising from increasing child poverty. There was only so much that a single local authority, itself facing savage cuts, could do.
Meic Goodyear
Lewes, East Sussex

• Just a few weeks ago, the prime minister and his health secretary were eager to tell us that they had fixed social care by allocating some additional funding. But as the York University research that you report on demonstrates, cuts to local government – a feature of the past 10 years, and most likely the next 10 – mean that the care system will continue to be starved of cash, even if fewer people have to sell their home to meet the cost of being cared for. Local governments assess, commission and in some cases also provide social care – they will continue to struggle to meet all their statutory obligations and will be berated for poor performance by the very people who will nod through reductions to the funds available.
Les Bright
Exeter, Devon

• If evidence were needed to show the obscene level of wealth inequality in modern Britain, one need only turn to the three articles on page 5 of Friday’s Guardian print edition. “A partially shredded Banksy painting has sold for £18,582,000”; “Parking space near Harrods goes on sale for £250,000”; and “Early austerity cuts linked to 57,550 deaths in England”.
Paul Morrison

• Polly Toynbee’s hard-hitting article on the ravages of austerity (Tory austerity caused misery – and now they want to make it worse, 15 October) makes it clear that more money needs to be spent on health, social care, housing and other basic human needs. Where could the money come from? It is past time that we made the link between having nuclear weapons and the most sophisticated aircraft carriers in the world on the one hand, and the suffering caused by poverty on the other.

We do not have extreme poverty in this country but, as Toynbee demonstrated, we have widespread misery and significant numbers of premature deaths caused by the deep cuts in public spending that began when David Cameron became prime minister in 2010.
Brendan O’Brien

• Polly Toynbee’s article explains why “the austerity deaths were predictable” and in her final paragraph predicts more to come, “with no lessons learned”. I can understand that Tory politicians don’t want to learn, but why is it taking the voters so long?
Hugh Whatley

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Lambeth cutting family centre funds | Letters
Letters: All councils have to react to government cuts – the test is how, says David Hopkins. Plus Dr Harry Harmer considers austerity’s legacy


04, Feb, 2019 @6:29 PM

Article image
Incalculable harm to special needs education | Letters
Letters: Guardian readers respond to our report on the rise in families desperate for educational support for their children


24, Oct, 2018 @5:09 PM

Article image
Austerity, outsourcing and English councils in crisis | Letters
Letters: Thatcherite ideology, incompetence and the abolition of the Audit Commission have all contributed to local government failures, readers suggest. But there’s good news from the London borough of Haringey


13, Aug, 2018 @4:49 PM

Article image
Angered by the damage that austerity does to the poor | Letters
Letters: Readers respond after the UN poverty envoy said austerity has inflicted ‘great misery’ on UK citizens


19, Nov, 2018 @5:46 PM

Article image
The SNP have done a great job, despite challenges imposed by austerity | Letters
Letters: An independent Scotland in full control of all of its finances would be able to do so much more, writes Liam Cunningham, while Anne Dalrymple praises Nicola Sturgeon’s grit and compassion


02, May, 2019 @4:36 PM

Article image
Theresa May’s ideas on austerity and acting in the national interest | Letters
Letters: Readers react with some scepticism to the prime minister’s claims to the Tory conference


04, Oct, 2018 @5:34 PM

Article image
Scandal of homeless deaths by austerity | Letters
Letters: Ian McCauley on the death of a friend let down by the system and Grahame Morris on Conservative culpability for austerity


07, Feb, 2019 @6:18 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on austerity: reversing Robin Hood | Editorial
Editorial: The poorest are pushed further into poverty, while the rich are given billions. Not satire, but the data


02, Nov, 2016 @12:01 AM

Article image
We’ve had so many reports on inequality – now act | Letters
Letters: Chris Grover says austerity policies are even more punishing than the workhouse, John Veit-Wilson on social security for everyone, Jack Czauderna on so many reports, Dr David Alderson on why he won’t vote for the Lib Dems, and Paul Nicolson et al on the inequality between renters and landlords or landowners


22, May, 2019 @4:51 PM

Article image
Heritage blighted by a decade of austerity | Letters
Letters: Funding cuts are forcing impossible choices on our local authorities, say Dr Ellen McAdam and Dr Frank Compton


19, Mar, 2019 @5:41 PM