Tobacco firms accused of using Formula One to flout ads ban on e-cigarettes

Campaigners claim Philip Morris and British American Tobacco are using sponsorship deals with McLaren and Ferrari to plug products

Britain’s biggest tobacco firm and one of its major rivals are under fire for signing multimillion-pound sponsorship deals with Formula One teams that health campaigners claim are being used to promote their next generation of products – such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco – which they are banned from advertising.

British American Tobacco, which sponsors the McLaren team, and Marlboro manufacturer Philip Morris International (PMI), which has signed a deal with Ferrari worth an estimated £100m a year, are accused of using the partnerships to promote what they respectively describe as “reduced risk products” and “less harmful alternatives to cigarettes”.

Ferrari cars promote PMI’s “Mission Winnow” initiative, which, according to its website, aims to find “new scientific solutions” that will “transform not only our company but an entire industry for the 1.1 billion people who smoke and those around them”. Some have claimed that the M in the branding is subtle plug for Marlboro, a claim categorically rejected by PMI ,which in 2010 was forced to remove all of its barcode logos on Ferrari cars after being accused of using subliminal advertising for Marlboro cigarettes.

McLaren cars carry BAT’s “A better tomorrow” slogan, which the F1 team says on its website is “centred on accelerating BAT’s transforming agenda, leveraging its portfolio of potentially reduced-risk products, aiming to deliver the world’s tobacco and nicotine consumers a better tomorrow”.

Phil Chamberlain, managing editor of Tobacco Tactics, part of the Tobacco Research Control Group at the University of Bath, said: “They’re trying to associate the new technology in cars and innovation with their move into e-cigarettes and making out that’s new technology. We see it as another front being opened up in the way tobacco companies are looking to legitimise their products and get out to as many audiences as possible.”

Deborah Arnott, chief executive of health charity Action on Smoking and Health (Ash), said: “For many years ‘Big Tobacco’ sponsored F1 so it could plaster its brands all over the sport. Such advertising, promotion and sponsorship is no longer legal, whether the brands are tobacco products or e-cigarettes. Instead, it has got back into sponsorship to attempt a corporate makeover from a business pariah whose products cause death and disease, to a socially responsible, hi-tech industry at the cutting edge of innovation. But make no mistake, Big Tobacco’s vast profits still come from its lethal products. Tobacco kills around 7 million people a year, and 80% of the world’s 1.1 billion smokers live in poor countries, where the burden of tobacco-related illness and death is heaviest, far from the glamour of Formula One.”

The links between the tobacco giants and F1 are long established. Senior PMI board members have even been on the board of Ferrari, and vice versa. But a blanket ban on tobacco companies advertising their brands on the cars has made sustaining this relationship more difficult.

The two firms had to remove their slogans from the cars for the Melbourne grand prix in March amid investigations by Australian health officials into whether they were in breach of advertising bans. However, PMI pledged that the branding will be on display for future races, starting with the Spanish grand prix in Barcelona this weekend. Its actions are likely to invite acute scrutiny from health campaigners and officials around the world.

“The fact that a complaint was made in Australia and they withdrew it suggests that this is a grey area,” Chamberlain said. The decision by the two companies to restore the branding comes after the EU’s Health, Food Safety and Energy Union department announced it was to investigate sponsorship deals between tobacco companies and F1 teams.

A spokesman for PMI said: “We have been clear that Mission Winnow does not and will not advertise or promote any PMI-branded tobacco or e-cigarette products.”

Simon Cleverly, group head of corporate affairs at BAT, said: “Many public health bodies around the world recognise the potential reduced-risk nature of e-cigarettes and the role they can play in helping smokers to quit and it therefore seems counter-intuitive that there is pressure to limit awareness of these products in a way that could potentially be detrimental to millions of smokers around the world.”

Contributor

Jamie Doward

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
How tobacco firms flout UK law on plain packaging
Brands use competitive price labels to avoid restrictions on marketing

Jamie Doward

08, Apr, 2017 @11:05 PM

Article image
Council’s vaping project with British American Tobacco labelled ‘a disgrace’
Birmingham criticised by health campaigners over tie-in that breaches established guidelines

Jamie Doward

09, Sep, 2018 @8:30 AM

Article image
Lobbyists with links to Big Tobacco fund pro-vaping Facebook campaigns
Secretive lobby groups are spreading pro-e-cigarette messages purporting to be grassroots campaigns

Shanti Das and Jon Ungoed-Thomas

18, Jun, 2023 @6:00 AM

Article image
Tobacco firms accused of funding campaign to keep cigarettes on display
National Federation of Retail Newsagents' campaign is being influenced by the tobacco industry, says trade body's ex-leader

Jamie Doward and Alex Ascherson

26, Feb, 2011 @8:54 PM

Article image
E-cigarettes: do they really work?
On the day that Celtic FC endorsed the tobacco-free substitutes, Kevin McKenna tests public reaction on the streets of Glasgow

Kevin McKenna

07, Sep, 2013 @11:06 PM

Article image
Tobacco companies accused of promoting cigarette brands online
Pro-tobacco content on Facebook and YouTube is glamorising smoking among the young, warn health groups

Jamie Doward and Denis Campbell

09, Oct, 2010 @11:04 PM

Tobacco firms' subtle tactics lure smokers to their brand

Philip Morris and other cigarette giants take to subliminal style messages after cigarette advertising is banned.

Jamie Doward and Lea Teuscher

25, Sep, 2005 @12:36 AM

Article image
After six deaths in the US and bans around the world – is vaping safe?
In Britain, e-cigarettes are seen as central to the fight against smoking, but many experts believe the evidence is contradictory

Jamie Doward

15, Sep, 2019 @8:15 AM

Article image
UK accused of hypocrisy on overseas tobacco control
Embassy relationships with companies such as BAT undermine anti-smoking policies

Jamie Doward

27, Jan, 2018 @10:00 PM

Article image
Legal loophole allows children to get free vape samples
UK health experts fear sharp rise in popularity of e-cigarettes among teenagers, as seen in the US

Jamie Doward

25, Oct, 2020 @9:15 AM