After two deadly disasters in five months, can Boeing survive?

The global grounding of its bestselling model after 346 deaths has created a genuine crisis for the company and its clients

Within three minutes of takeoff, Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 had accelerated to unusually high speeds. Captain Yared Getachew knew something was wrong as the aircraft, a Boeing 737 Max 8, erratically dipped and climbed by hundreds of feet. He radioed air traffic control, requesting a return to Addis Ababa airport.

He was cleared to return and the aircraft began to turn right, climbing even higher. A minute later, flight 302 disappeared from the radar.

All 157 people on board were killed as the plane crashed 30 miles south-east of the airport, approximately six minutes into its two-hour flight to Nairobi. It was the second fatal accident involving a Boeing 737 Max 8 in five months, following the crash last October of a Lion Air flight in Indonesia with the loss of 189 lives.

Suspicion over the cause of both crashes is centred on the plane’s new flight control system – MCAS, or Manoeuvring Characteristics Augmentation System – which can intervene to push the plane’s nose down automatically when it rises.

On Wednesday, Boeing said it was suspending operations of the entire global fleet of 371 aircraft, after the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) imposed a temporary ban on the model. Dozens of countries had already imposed bans earlier in the week. The fleet will be grounded until Boeing installs a software update for the jet’s flight systems, which could happen before the end of the month, according to one report last week.

As Boeing scrambles to fix one of its most significant products, there are questions now over the impact on the world’s most renowned aerospace group. The crashes are devastating for Boeing because the 737 has been a staple of its roster for more than 50 years. It is the company’s bestseller and a short-haul workhorse. The new version, the Max, is more fuel-efficient than previous models and has clocked up $600bn (£450bn) worth of orders. “It’s a very important aircraft to Boeing, with 5,000 orders placed,” said John Strickland, an aviation analyst.

It’s likely to be a tough few months for the Chicago-based manufacturer, with regulatory issues, legal claims and the threat of cancelled orders piling up. Last Sunday’s crash hit shares hard as soon as markets opened on Monday, and wiped $25bn from its value over the course of last week.

One of the engines from flight 302, the second Boeing 737 Max 8 to come down.
One of the engines from flight 302, the second Boeing 737 Max 8 to come down. Photograph: Jemal Countess/Getty Images

Boeing now faces a struggle to maintain that huge order book: several big customers have threatened to cancel in the wake of the crash. VietJet, which doubled its order to about $25bn last month, said it would decide on its plans once the cause of the tragedy had been found. Others putting the squeeze on Boeing are Utair of Russia and Kenya Airways, which could switch to Airbus’s short-haul rival, the A320. Lion Air is also said to be reviewing a $22bn order for the 737.

A source said: “The commercial reality is that Boeing will be offering all sorts of incentives to customers in order to persuade them to stay. If I know Boeing, it will be in company meltdown trying to sort this out. You can see what it’s doing to the share price and to passenger confidence in the 737 Max. This is tough stuff.” But crucially, its three big US customers – American, Southwest and United – are standing behind the Max.

Despite the scale of the reputational and commercial crisis facing the company, many experts believe Boeing will recover, because technical problems – albeit none as fatal as the one apparently facing the 737 Max – have been overcome before. The FAA grounded the company’s 787 Dreamliner in 2013 because of a problem with its batteries catching fire, which was subsequently fixed. “That didn’t have any long-term impact on customer confidence and it has become a very successful aircraft,” Strickland noted.

Regulators around the world grounded the 737 Max after concluding there were too many similarities between the Addis Ababa disaster and the crash of Lion Air flight 610. That also plummeted from the skies shortly after takeoff: a preliminary investigation shows the pilots struggled to get control of the plane after the nose was forced down by the flight control system.

The seeds of Boeing’s misery were sown back in the winter of 2010. Airbus, its big European rival, caught it off guard with the news that it was relaunching its short-haul workhorse with new engines as the A320neo.

Airlines had pressured the two manufacturers for a more fuel-efficient plane following a jump in the cost of oil in 2008, when a price of $147 per barrel forced dozens of carriers into bankruptcy.

The A320neo forced Boeing to retaliate by creating a revamped 737 – one with engines that could deliver the fuel-efficiency now demanded by their customers.

The 737 Max would do that, but not without some engineering witchcraft to help fit its big new engines under the wings. The American manufacturer had to extend the nose landing gear, add aerodynamic winglets and push the technology to make it more efficient and cheaper to operate.

The engines may have solved one problem, but they created another. Testing showed that in certain conditions the plane was prone to entering a nose-up aerodynamic stall – where the aircraft cannot create enough lift from the airflow over its wings.

Boeing attempted to fix the issue by installing the MCAS, which would stabilise the aircraft by bringing the nose down. This system is now at the centre of the investigation into the Lion Air crash and appears to be implicated in the Ethiopian Airlines disaster.

Boeing’s factory in Renton, Washington
Boeing’s factory in Renton, Washington. Photograph: Stephen Brashear/Getty Images

In December, the FAA issued an airworthiness directive to all owners of the 737 Max. It warned of an issue where the automated anti-stall system would engage if “an erroneously high single AOA [angle of attack] sensor input is received by the flight control system”. The system would then automatically attempt repeated nose-down commands. “This condition, if not addressed, could cause the flight crew to have difficulty controlling the airplane, and lead to excessive nose-down attitude, significant altitude loss, and possible impact with terrain,” it said.

Automation has increased in order to eradicate human error, which has traditionally been the biggest cause of air accidents. David Gleave, a safety expert, said: “Very few airplanes fall out of the sky because the wings fall off. Most of the time it’s related to human error. Automation can go too far, but this is an extra security system that was brought in to cure something and has caused a problem elsewhere … There’s a history of problems with the introduction of new technology. But people are not going to stop flying in 737s because of this.”

Boeing’s executives will be pleading with customers and investors for patience. But they need to come up with a fix, and soon.


Karl West

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Doomed Boeing planes lacked two optional safety features – report
Neither 737 Max aircraft in Indonesia and Ethiopia crashes had sensors sold for extra cost but one could become standard on planes

Angela Monaghan

22, Mar, 2019 @5:49 AM

Article image
Boeing Max 737 jet crisis: we should've been more open, says CEO
Boss says aircraft maker failed to communicate properly with regulators and customers

Miles Brignall

16, Jun, 2019 @5:20 PM

Article image
In 2005, Helios flight 522 crashed into a Greek hillside. Was it because one man forgot to flip a switch?
The accident led to the deaths of 121 people, and an eight-year legal battle for engineer Alan Irwin. This is what happens when the finger of blame is pointed at you

Sally Williams

19, Sep, 2020 @7:00 AM

Article image
Midair collisions to metal fatigue: tragedies that changed air travel
Aviation technology continues to advance, but some improvements have been a reaction to major disasters

Karl West

16, Mar, 2019 @3:59 PM

Article image
Ethiopian Airlines crash – a visual guide to what we know so far
Disaster marks second crash for Boeing 737 Max 8 in four months, with passengers from 35 different countries

Gwyn Topham Transport correspondent

12, Mar, 2019 @3:00 PM

Article image
Boeing: global grounding of 737 Max will cost company more than $1bn
Plane-maker says it’s abandoned 2019 financial outlook and halted share buybacks in mid-March as it deals with crisis

Dominic Rushe , Rob Davies and agencies

24, Apr, 2019 @6:27 PM

Article image
Boeing 737 Max won't fly again before August, says airline trade body
Plane grounded after two crashes likely to remain grounded into peak season

Gwyn Topham Transport correspondent

29, May, 2019 @4:33 PM

Article image
Ethiopian flight 302: second new Boeing 737 to crash in four months
Confidence that a newer plane inevitably means a safer plane in danger of being shaken

Gwyn Topham Transport correspondent

10, Mar, 2019 @3:37 PM

Article image
737 Max scandal: the internal Boeing messages and emails
Excerpts of exchanges between staff discussing flaws and substandard work on the project‘Designed by clowns’

Mark Sweney and Gwyn Topham

10, Jan, 2020 @5:13 PM

Article image
Boeing 737 Max jets could fly again by January with safety checks under way
World’s biggest planemaker hopes aviation authorities will soon approve plane’s flight control software

Martin Farrer

12, Nov, 2019 @3:38 AM