New cars much less fuel efficient than manufacturers claim, research finds

Australian Automobile Association finds fuel use on average 25% higher than claimed on consumption label displayed on new cars

New cars are using vastly more fuel on the road than in laboratory tests, raising further questions about the veracity of car manufacturers’ claims in the wake of the Volkswagen emissions scandal.

The Australian Automobile Association-commissioned research found fuel use was on average 25% higher than claimed on the government-mandated fuel consumption label displayed on all new cars.

In some cases, they were 60% above the fuel use claimed on the label.

On-road noxious gas emissions from five diesel cars were found to be over the legal limit, in one case by up to eight times.

Two petrol cars were significantly above the limits for carbon monoxide emissions.

The research, conducted by technical consulting firm Abmarc, examined 17 new and commonly available cars in the past 10 months.

The AAA did not name and shame individual manufacturers, but said the cars were selected across brands, vehicle types and fuel types.

The 2015 Volkswagen scandal raised serious concerns about the truth of car manufacturers’ emissions claims. Volkswagen was caught installing software in cars that allowed it to game emissions tests in the United States.

That scandal was uncovered after environmental groups detected discrepancies between real-world emissions and those recorded in tests.

The federal government is currently considering tightening emissions and CO2 standards, effectively moving from the “Euro 5” to “Euro 6” standard.

That would bring Australia in line with international standards following years of lagging behind the European Union and the US.

The AAA is opposed to the government’s standards proposal, saying it will cost motorists without delivering any benefit to the environment.

It last week described the plan as an “uncoordinated process” that had no robust cost-benefit analysis.

The AAA chief executive, Michael Bradley, said the results of its latest testing showed the assumptions underpinning the government’s proposal were flawed.

“These results are bad news for Australian consumers looking for good information on which to base their car-buying decisions,” Bradley said.

“They also place a huge question mark over the fuel and cost-savings the government is offering Australians under its proposals to introduce tougher vehicle emissions restrictions.

“Our test results are a warning to Australians to take the government’s promises of fuel and cost-savings with a grain of salt, and expect those savings to be significantly less than what’s promised.”

A spokesman for the urban infrastructure minister, Paul Fletcher, said it was well known that pollutants emitted in laboratory conditions would generally be lower than on-road driving tests.

He said the way vehicles were tested for emissions was “quite separate” from the current question of whether car emissions should be changed or tightened.

“No decisions have yet been taken – the matter will be considered by cabinet later this year,” the spokesman said.

The cars tested had all driven at least 2,000km but no more than 85,000km, and were 2014 models or newer.

The cars were tested twice, from a cold start and a warm start, and were driven along the same route in Melbourne, which contained urban, extra-urban and freeway driving.

Bradley said the AAA supported reducing emissions and strengthening standards, but said policy must “deliver for the environment at the least cost to motorists and the economy”.

“The AAA and Australia’s motoring clubs again call on the government to update its modelling, undertake further public consultation and introduce real-world driving testing for new vehicles in Australia,” he said.

The federal government allows the use of test results from international laboratories for assessment against Australian standards. The government also audits test results.

The ministerial forum on vehicle emissions is considering how to reduce emissions from Australia’s vehicle fleet. It has released three papers for consultation, including a draft regulation impact statement on new fuel efficiency and noxious emissions standards.

Those impact statements included a cost-benefit analysis of the changes, which considered recent studies on the discrepancies between laboratory-tested and on-road emissions.

To address the discrepancy, the statements recommended adopting the latest standards, which introduce a more representative laboratory test and an on-road driving emissions test.

Contributor

Christopher Knaus

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Australian cars use more fuel and emit more fumes than advertised, says AAA
Australian Automobile Association says it found fuel consumption is up to 35% higher and emissions up to four times higher than claimed

Naaman Zhou

12, Dec, 2016 @5:56 AM

Article image
Car manufacturers manipulating fuel efficiency tests, says report

Campaign group says carmakers exploit loopholes in EU law to achieve favourable but unrealistic miles/gallon results

John Vidal, environment editor

14, Mar, 2013 @7:00 AM

Article image
Car manufacturers were warned about risk of $1bn emission fines
Volkswagen was among companies warned in February they could risk fines for failing to meet stringent targets

James Hulse

24, Sep, 2015 @3:52 PM

Article image
Victoria’s electric vehicle tax faces high court challenge
Case, launched by two Melbourne EV drivers, will argue the levy is unconstitutional and ‘similar to the GST which is a commonwealth tax’

Lisa Cox

16, Sep, 2021 @10:53 AM

Article image
Volkswagen’s US compensation deal leaves British drivers fuming
With VW owners this side of the pond yet to be paid a penny after the emissions scandal, is the government doing enough to protect them?

Miles Brignall

29, Oct, 2016 @6:00 AM

Article image
Dieselgate: UK motorists file class-action suit against VW
Greenpeace and Which? welcome move by 10,000 Volkswagen owners for £3,000 in compensation as carmaker faces bill as high as £3.6bn

Rob Davies

09, Jan, 2017 @12:21 PM

Article image
German court rules against Volkswagen in 'dieselgate' scandal
Carmaker must pay compensation to motorist who bought minivan fitted with emissions-cheating software

Jasper Jolly

25, May, 2020 @4:48 PM

Brussels backs scrapping older cars to promote fuel-efficient models

European commission urges EIB to offer up £32bn in soft loans to help industry design green technologies

David Gow in Brussels

30, Oct, 2008 @12:01 AM

Article image
The death of diesel: can struggling industry woo back consumers?
Amid fears about pollution, penalties and bans, buyers are abandoning diesel cars in droves

Gwyn Topham

04, Mar, 2018 @8:00 AM

Article image
VW scandal pushes diesel cars into the slow lane
Buyers are turning away from all diesel models, and cleaning up the technology will be a long and expensive business

Julia Löhr

05, Dec, 2015 @4:00 PM