EDF's Hinkley Point deal over radioactive waste sparks anger

Expert criticises ministers over refusal to disclose agreement with energy supplier for planned nuclear plant

A furious row has broken out after the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) refused to disclose the arrangement with EDF for dealing with radioactive waste at the planned Hinkley Point C nuclear plant.

The information commissioner’s office has turned down a freedom of information (FoI) request for state aid arrangements between the UK and the European commission to be made public.

The FoI complainant, David Lowry, has launched an appeal, claiming it is in the public interest for British citizens to be able to judge whether their government had made the right decision about the new reactors in Somerset.

Lowry, a British-based senior research fellow with the Institute for Resource and Security Studies in the US, said: “I do not believe the balance of judgment should be in favour of a foreign company, EDF Energy, who will potentially make huge multibillion-pound financial gain from the continued non-disclosure, and hence non scrutiny, over myself as a British tax and electricity bill payer.”

The government said that anyone building new reactors in Britain must manage and pay for the cost of handling waste products, unlike the existing situation where all radioactive materials are effectively dealt with through the public purse via the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.

However, although the operator must agree to take responsibility for the spent fuel and other radioactive waste, the cost is expected to be passed on to the domestic electricity user through higher bills.

Under the new arrangements, the prospective nuclear operators must enter into a waste transfer contract (WTC). Those contracts, like the one covering Hinkley, must be submitted for scrutiny by the EC under its state aid rules. It is the pricing methodology of the WTC that Lowry wished to review and which remains under wraps.

Greenpeace said Lowry raised critical issues that went to the heart of whether the £18.5bn project was good or bad value for the taxpayer and British energy consumers.

John Sauven, the executive director of Greenpeace, said: “The government has repeatedly said that Hinkley is great news for the British public and our energy security. But they refuse to back this up with hard evidence. In fact, DECC is incredibly cagey and is failing to answer questions on where the dangerous radioactive waste will go or how much Hinkley will cost us.

“If Hinkley is such a good deal, it should be no problem for the government to release the information to prove it. Their failure to do so leaves us to believe that their assumptions are correct - it’s a terrible deal for bill payers and they simply don’t know what to do with the nuclear waste.”

DECC turned down the original request under regulation 12(5)(a) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 arguing, “disclosure would adversely affect international relations, defence, national security or public safety”.

This argument was accepted by the information commissioner who believed that disclosure of the state aid discussions with the EC “would adversely affect the relationship between the (UK) government and the commission’s ability to work effectively together”.

The information commissioner acknowledged that there were “strong public interest arguments in favour of disclosure” but he believed there was a stronger argument for protecting the confidentiality of the material.

Lowry said he thought the real reason the government did not want to disclose the information was to save ministers from embarrassment. “I think the concern is if the truth were to come out with documents being made public would adversely affect the credibility of the government submissions as their threadbare content would be laid bare for all to see,” he said.

DECC declined to comment, saying it was a matter for the information commissioner.

Contributor

Terry Macalister

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Secret government papers show taxpayers will pick up costs of Hinkley nuclear waste storage
Documents released more than a year after Freedom of Information request show steps Whitehall took to reassure French energy firm EDF and Chinese investors

Jamie Doward

30, Oct, 2016 @6:00 AM

Article image
Hinkley Point: the ‘dreadful deal’ behind the world’s most expensive power plant
The long read: Building Britain’s first new nuclear reactor since 1995 will cost twice as much as the 2012 Olympics – and by the time it is finished, nuclear power could be a thing of the past. How could the government strike such a bad deal?

Holly Watt

21, Dec, 2017 @6:00 AM

Article image
No justification for Hinkley Point C waste secrecy | Letters
Letters: The information commissioner has put EDF’s narrow commercial interests before the interest of the health and safety of the community

Letters

02, Jun, 2016 @6:06 PM

Article image
Hinkley Point review gives UK golden opportunity | Letters
Letters: They must scrap HS2 and use the money on a European supergrid in order to iron out fluctuations from different sources of renewable energy

Letters

29, Jul, 2016 @5:49 PM

Article image
Hinkley Point: UN report says UK failed to consult over risks
UN Economic and Social Council says Britain has not met its obligations to discuss the impact of nuclear accident with neighbouring countries

Terry Macalister

08, May, 2016 @3:49 PM

Article image
Nuclear watchdog raises Hinkley Point C concerns
Management failings could affect safety at EDF power station if unaddressed, says inspector

Adam Vaughan

25, Mar, 2018 @3:20 PM

Article image
Hinkley Point: China incorporates seven London-based firms
Critics fear deal’s growing complexity and question why so many companies have been set up at Mayfair base of China’s state-owned nuclear power firm

Terry Macalister, Energy editor

03, Apr, 2016 @12:25 PM

Article image
Reactor goes here ... the £18bn Hinkley Point C starts to take shape
Adam Vaughan visits the nuclear site in Somerset, where EDF is pushing ahead despite challenges from unions and Brexit

Adam Vaughan

21, Apr, 2017 @1:05 PM

Article image
Hinkley Point C is £1.5bn over budget and a year behind schedule, EDF admits
Cost of controversial nuclear power plant in Somerset has risen to £20.3bn and delayed by 15 months, says French energy firm

Adam Vaughan

03, Jul, 2017 @2:25 PM

Article image
Flamanville: France's beleaguered forerunner to Hinkley Point C
Over-budget and behind schedule, the €10.5bn nuclear reactor has faced problems that some say could be repeated in the UK

Jennifer Rankin in Flamanville

27, Jul, 2016 @1:58 PM