MPs denounce government TTIP plans amid fears for NHS and public services

BIS committee report savages government stance on EU-US trade deal and calls for more evidence and deeper assessments

A future government must be allowed to expand the NHS without facing legal challenge under a proposed new EU-US trade deal, according to a sharply critical report from an all-party committee of MPs. The Business, Innovation and Skills committee said the government needed stronger evidence to back up its claim that the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) would bring a boost of £100bn a year to the UK.

It also said the case had not been made for the highly controversial investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), the provision that would allow private investors to sue governments for the loss of future profits caused by decisions made by national parliaments.

Adrian Bailey, the BIS committee chair, said TTIP had the potential to help the UK economy and criticised the “dog whistle” politics used by both supporters and opponents of the deal. “More detail needs to be made available to allow greater public scrutiny of this extensive trade agreement,” Bailey said. “Campaigners, lobbyists, business groups, government and the European commission also need to do more to engage with the evidence rather than make unsupported claims about the benefits or risks of TTIP.”

The committee reserved its strongest criticism for the government, which has been firm in its support for TTIP and wants the European commission to conclude negotiations as swiftly as possible. “Whilst TTIP has the potential to deliver economic benefits to the United Kingdom, it is impossible at this stage to quantify those benefits in any meaningful way. Rather than continue to use the £100bn figure, the government must come up with a comprehensive assessment which includes the estimated economic yield of a variety of levels of agreement.”

The report added that MPs were “deeply concerned” about the government’s intention not to submit a formal response to the EC’s consultation on ISDS provisions. “Concerns have been raised about ISDS provisions in TTIP. We are not convinced the case has been made for the inclusion of ISDS clauses and we urge the government to set out a clear statement guaranteeing the protection of public services at present – and the right to expand them in the future – is set out in any ISDS provisions,” the report said.

BIS said the government wanted to put to bed the myths that surrounded TTIP. “National governments set the rules about which companies can run NHS clinical services. These rules have never been, and will never be, set by trade deals such as TTIP. The European commission has repeatedly confirmed that this is the case.”

Polly Jones, head of campaigns and policy at Global Justice Now, said: “The BIS report shares the concerns of the general public on TTIP – the secrecy, ISDS, the lack of evidence to substantiate the benefits, and the threat to public services. It demonstrates once more that the government is out of step in aggressively pushing this controversial trade deal.”

Contributor

Larry Elliott

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Boris Johnson accused of 'dishonest gymnastics' over TTIP U-turn
Tory MP Sir Nicholas Soames criticises Johnson for attacking EU-US trade deal that he previously lauded as ‘Churchillian’

Toby Helm Political editor

14, May, 2016 @4:19 PM

Article image
What is TTIP and why should we be angry about it?
The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership may sound boring, but it could affect everything from your income to the food you eat and the state of the NHS. Here is a beginners’ guide to the controversial trade deal

Stuart Jeffries

03, Aug, 2015 @5:15 PM

Article image
US seeking bilateral trade deal with UK to press EU on TTIP
American officials moving swiftly to cement economic relationship with Britain and speed up stalled transatlantic trade deal with Europe

Patrick Wintour diplomatic editor

20, Jul, 2016 @5:41 PM

Article image
EU-US trade deal could add £10bn to UK economy a year, claims minister
TTIP negotiations are transparent and are not driven by interests of big transnational firms that want deregulation, says Livingston

Katie Allen

01, Sep, 2014 @3:43 PM

Article image
Anger as government blocks TTIP legal documents relating to health service
Business secretary refuses to disclose advice that could show how private health firms might sue government under US-Europe trade deal

Phillip Inman Economics correspondent

26, Jan, 2016 @7:50 PM

Article image
UN calls for suspension of TTIP talks over fears of human rights abuses
UN lawyer says tactics used by multinationals in courts outside of public jurisdiction would undermine democracy and law

Phillip Inman Economics correspondent

04, May, 2015 @4:45 PM

Article image
Who really benefits from free trade agreements like TTIP, Ceta and Nafta? | Letters
Letters: The unfettered free trade we have now, based largely upon who can pay least to those producing our goods, is not fair trade. It has run its course

Letters

15, Nov, 2016 @7:01 PM

Article image
TTIP deal poses 'real and serious risk' to NHS, says leading QC
Unite union set to present law expert’s advice to government, who they believe have kept Britain in the dark over deal’s potential impact on health service

Ben Quinn

22, Feb, 2016 @7:30 AM

Article image
The promised ‘transparency’ around TTIP has been a sham | Sven Giegold
The most important documents about the TTIP talks are unavailable to us MEPs as well as the public – and it suits big business to keep it that way

Sven Giegold

31, Aug, 2015 @4:17 PM

Article image
David Cameron calls for political courage to seal TTIP deal
PM says EU-US trade deal would be good for UK and dismisses concerns over impact on NHS as ‘reddest of red herrings’

Rowena Mason Political correspondent

04, May, 2016 @7:12 PM