Is The Golden Notebook a feminist novel?

For all the suffering its women endure at the hands of men, it’s not hard to see why Doris Lessing disliked her book’s polemical reputation

The New York Times critic Ernest Buickler once wrote that “a firkinful of scorching aphorisms” could be culled from nearly every page of The Golden Notebook. An exaggeration, of course – but only just. Doris Lessing’s 1962 novel is eminently quotable:

“For with my intuition I knew that this man was repeating a pattern over and over again: courting a woman with his intelligence and sympathy, claiming her emotionally; then, when she began to claim in return, running away. And the better a woman was, the sooner he would begin to run.”

“The real revolution is women against men.”

“If we lead what is known as free lives, that is, lives like men, why shouldn’t we use the same language.”

“One had to be much older than I was then to understand George’s relationship with his wife. He had a fierce loyal compassion for her, the compassion of one victim for another.”

In addition to all the aphorisms, there’s also some scorching dialogue – such as this conversation between two female friends about a married but impotent would-be-lover:

And so this man spent a second night with Julia. With no better results.

“Naturally he left at four, so that the little woman could believe he had been working late. Just as he left he turned on me and said: ‘You’re a castrating woman, I thought you were from the moment I saw you.’”

“Jesus,” said Ella.

“Yes,” said Julia fiercely. “And the funny thing is, he’s a nice man. I mean, I would never have expected that sort of remark from him.”

There are also wonderfully revealing moments:

He sauced her with his eye; sitting up broad, solid, pink-cheeked; very sure of himself and his world in this house.

“Why haven’t you put on the dress you said you were going to wear?”

“I’ve decided to wear this instead.”

“Women,” said the nine-year-old, in a lordly way. “Women and their dresses.”

I didn’t just select these extracts because they are delicious. They provide a neat demonstration of why the Oxford Companion to English Literature describes The Golden Notebook as a landmark of the women’s movement in the 1960s, an achievement Lessing disliked, denying that the novel was a “trumpet for women’s liberation” or an account of “the sex war”.

It would be reductive to describe all of Lessing’s female characters as victims. Most of them are too smart, determined and independent-minded to allow themselves to be beaten down entirely. But the odds are stacked against them, especially in their relationships with men.

Time and again, the men get to do and say dreadful things, then trot off unscathed to their next victims. (Give or take a bit of wounded pride about their inability to “get a hard on”.) The women are left holding the baby, literally and metaphorically, as the consequences of relationship problems fall harder on them. Meanwhile, the men unfailingly abuse their power. They present a physical threat, they have more money, and conventional society tends to take their side, no matter how awful their behaviour.

When one useless, stupid, drunken husband publicly labels his wife as an “ugly whore” and “barren bitch” because she has had an affair, she just has to suck it up. “She lifted her ruin of a face to us,” the narrator says, “pulling at her lovely red hair with both hands, the tears dropping off her chin.” Nobody does anything. The husband continues with the insults.

It’s impossible to read The Golden Notebook without thinking that there’s something very wrong in the gender relations it describes and in the world at large. It’s easy to see why readers might have taken it as a call to arms and feminist inspiration. But even so, it’s just as easy to see why Lessing was annoyed that people might describe the novel in exclusively feminist terms. It’s too complicated and ambiguous to fit any political programme. It isn’t didactic. It doesn’t have a straightforward thesis. Plenty of male characters also fall victim to social inequalities and moralistic absurdities. Many of the female characters are just as problematic as the men. Meanwhile, the most straightforwardly likable character is a man called Cy Maitland, an American brain surgeon who is always “fresh and vital”, enthusiastic and as happy as a labrador jumping into a lake. Lessing doesn’t necessarily take sides – or even suggest that there are any.

The Golden Notebook has as much to say about socialism, racism and literary culture as it does about feminism. It’s also, as Lessing pointed out in her preface, an intimate, claustrophobic and necessarily disturbing portrait of people who are “cracking up”. There’s a lot going on, in other words – but it is a big book, after all.

Contributor

Sam Jordison

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Struggling with The Golden Notebook? The hard work is worth it
For every moment of high drama, there are also sections of intense tedium. But Doris Lessing’s masterpiece delivers a big payoff

Sam Jordison

22, Oct, 2019 @12:08 PM

Article image
Doris Lessing's The Golden Notebook is our Reading group book for October
The 1962 novel is a challenging masterpiece – luckily, its author wrote a blisteringly bad-tempered guide to reading it

Sam Jordison

08, Oct, 2019 @12:12 PM

Article image
How much did The Golden Notebook lift from Doris Lessing’s life?
A centenary exhibition of her archive shows the novel’s cast of feverish radicals were drawn recognisably from people she knew

Sam Jordison

29, Oct, 2019 @12:00 PM

Article image
Doris Lessing's Golden Notebook, 50 years on

Lessing's radical exploration of communism, female liberation, motherhood and mental breakdown was hailed as the 'feminist bible' and reviled as 'castrating'. Four generations of writers – Diana Athill, Margaret Drabble, Rachel Cusk and Natalie Hanman – reflect on what it means to them

06, Apr, 2012 @9:55 PM

Article image
10 inspiring female writers you need to read
As a response to Gay Talese’s failure to name any inspirational female writers, we asked our readers to explain why and how these authors changed their lives

Marta Bausells

06, Apr, 2016 @2:10 PM

Article image
Nights at the Circus is feminist, but its 'psychedelic Dickens' is not a lecture
Angela Carter’s heroine’s adventures, bouncing off patriarchal barriers, are full of ideas – but the author’s extravagant invention is never merely didactic

Sam Jordison

21, Feb, 2017 @12:48 PM

Article image
Reading group: which Doris Lessing book should we read in October?
This month marks the centenary of the British-Zimbabwean’s birth, and we’re celebrating her remarkable career. Help us choose a book

Sam Jordison

01, Oct, 2019 @12:54 PM

Article image
Graeme Allister: Doris Lessing's Golden Notebook 2.0

Graeme Allister: The Nobel laureate's classic novel is the focus of an exciting new web project

Graeme Allister

14, Nov, 2008 @10:30 AM

Article image
Margaret Drabble's Jerusalem the Golden isn't a 'Hampstead novel'
Her books have been derided as cliched tales of monied adultery, and as retreads of northerners’ escapes south – but Jerusalem the Golden is richer and stranger than that

Sam Jordison

17, Oct, 2017 @11:09 AM

Article image
Reading group: which European novel should we read in June?
Restricting the choice to books published since the Treaty of Rome still leaves a dizzying array of possibilities. Please cast your votes in a fun Euro election!

Sam Jordison

28, May, 2019 @10:12 AM