‘The greatest literary editor there has ever been’ – John Banville remembers Robert Silvers

The death this week of the New York Review of Books editor marks the loss of one of publishing’s most brilliant minds

Robert Silvers was one of the most significant cultural figures of our time. This will seem a large claim to make about the editor of a twice-monthly literary magazine, but then the New York Review of Books – or “the paper”, as Silvers always called it – was more than your usual lit mag. There had been great journals before it, of course, notably the Times Literary Supplement and the Paris Review – which Silvers edited for a time. But the NYRB was a unique phenomenon: unapologetically intellectual, politically radical, distinctive in its high-toned New York fashion and wholly committed to civilised values. And from the outset Silvers was its heart and, more importantly, its brain.

He was surely the greatest literary editor there has ever been – brilliant, autocratic, endlessly curious and possessed of an extraordinary fund of knowledge about a vast range of subjects. True, he was not always easy to deal with, but when has the best ever been easy? His gift for matching books to reviewers was uncanny; the FedEx package would arrive, containing a volume I could not imagine wanting to read, much less review. Yet a few weeks later I would find myself writing three or four thousand enthusiastic words on it, and wondering why I had not taken notice of this author, or that subject, before.

How did he do it? He just knew, by a kind of sympathetic magic, that the unlikeliest-seeming book would be to a reviewer’s taste. He or she would not know it until one of Bob’s typed notes – his handwriting was terrible – issued a courtly invitation to “see if something might be done” on yet another weighty biography of Kafka, or a satisfyingly nasty late novel by Kingsley Amis.

He was born and brought up in New York and its environs, and was entirely a product of the exciting and intellectually stimulating east coast milieu. The NYRB began life in 1963, during a newspaper printers’ strike in the city. In at the birth with Silvers were editors Barbara Epstein and her husband Jason Epstein, the writer Elizabeth Hardwick and the poet Robert Lowell, and the publisher A Whitney Ellsworth. The first issue, on 1 February 1963, was astonishing, with pieces by WH Auden, Susan Sontag, Norman Mailer, Gore Vidal and many others, all of whom wrote essay-length reviews for no fee. Autres temps, autre moeurs

Silvers seemed to work all hours of the day, and all days of the week, including holidays – yes, I had a Christmas morning call from him, asking if I would care to reply to a letter from an academic in Nebraska commenting adversely on one of my pieces. His enthusiasm for literature and ideas – the NYRB was more concerned with the life of the mind than it was with the world of books – stamped itself on every page he published. At this perilous time, political and cultural, for America and the west in general, his death is our great loss. The king is dead; long live “the paper”.

Contributor

John Banville

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Rowan Williams remembers Geoffrey Hill
At a time when the UK has experienced one of its most shameful periods of dishonest collusiveness, Hill’s loss should be felt all the more acutely

Rowan Williams

09, Jul, 2016 @8:00 AM

Article image
May, Balls, Clegg, Clarke: it is political biography season
As scores of politicians line up to release books, the first Theresa May biography is set to reveal far less racy details than David Cameron’s...

Jane Merrick

03, Sep, 2016 @12:00 PM

Article image
Why big publishers are ‘shying away’ from Theresa May
Small publishing houses have been snapping up deals for a biography of the new PM, so when will the traditional political publishers join the race?

Katy Guest

15, Jul, 2016 @1:59 PM

Article image
Male writers still dominate book reviews and critic jobs, Vida study finds
The annual Vida count of authors across the world suggests about two-thirds of those published, and the critics who review them, are men – but their intersectionality survey is less conclusive

Katy Guest

19, Oct, 2017 @4:25 PM

Article image
Brought to book: when publishers go to court
A writer has just won a legal battle with Marvel and DC, but how do publishers usually fare in the courts?

John Dugdale

28, May, 2016 @1:00 PM

Article image
Pay-back time for publishers: authors forced to return their advances
This week, it emerged that Pride and Prejudice and Zombies author Seth Grahame-Smith was being sued by his publisher to return his advance. From Julian Assange to Amy Schumer, he isn’t alone...

John Dugdale

02, Sep, 2016 @9:00 AM

Article image
Hilary Mantel’s in, David Starkey’s out: the literary battle of Brussels
Can you guess which side famous authors and historians have picked in the EU referendum debate? Prepare for some surprises …

John Dugdale

11, Jun, 2016 @2:00 PM

Article image
How to turn down a prestigious literary prize – a winner’s guide to etiquette
Following Joseph Andras’s surprise decision to turn down the Goncourt first novel prize, it’s time to weigh up the pros and cons of rejecting a literary award

John Dugdale

21, May, 2016 @2:00 PM

Article image
Going for a gong: the week in literary prizes – roundup
We toast the winners of the Goldsmiths prize, the National Book awards, the Warwick prize for women in translation and the Stephen Spender for poetry

John Dugdale

17, Nov, 2017 @10:30 AM

Article image
Gunpowder plots: how Guy Fawkes ignited an explosive literary legacy
Remember, remember … from Shakespeare to James Shapiro to the website that deals in political scandal, the name of Guy Fawkes is literary dynamite

John Dugdale

03, Nov, 2017 @12:00 PM