The Magic of Reality by Richard Dawkins – review

Richard Dawkins's child-friendly endorsement of science is both enlightening and controversial

Dawkins's 11th book spells out, in child-friendly language, how science is better than religion at explaining the way the natural world works. "Stories are fun," he writes, "and we all love repeating them," but "to claim a supernatural explanation of something is not to explain it at all."

Winter isn't really caused by Persephone's trip to the underworld, rainbows don't signal God's promise to Noah, and dawn will break each day even if the Aztec sun-god Huitzilopochtli doesn't get his daily dose of still-beating human hearts. We now know about atoms, orbits and refracted light, and Dawkins gives a clear breakdown of the scientific method, its virtues, and what it has uncovered.

When The Magic of Reality was published in hardback, it was lavishly illustrated: a coffee-table book for kids. Now, with a beige cover, no pictures and 257 pages, it becomes a less enticing proposition for anyone who needs to know what tectonic plates are and how the food chain works. The level fluctuates from pre-GCSE science to more advanced ideas: the Doppler effect leading scientists to their model of the big bang, comets' tails being caused by solar wind, how radio waves are made from the same stuff as light.

The explanations are enlightening, but the ideas that underpin Dawkins's central argument – that the world is fundamentally physical and knowable, that religion and scientific understanding cannot coexist – are more controversial.

Dawkins defines reality as what can be perceived with the senses, detected with scientific instruments, or predicted with models, such as black holes. He also adds "jealousy and joy, happiness and love," as they "depend for their existence on brains". While it could be retorted that zombies depend for their existence on brains too, and it doesn't make them real, Dawkins is simplifying. He means that there's no more to feelings than the physical state of our brains and bodies: a belief as unverifiable as anything about Huitzilopochtli.

Dawkins is currently battling against the teaching of creationism as fact in faith schools, and in that context his endorsement of the scientific method is important, but he fails to acknowledge that religion and science aren't always trying to answer the same questions. His simplification of religious belief puts him in danger of preaching to the converted, at best, and, at worst, suggesting to kids that their Christian, Muslim or Jewish peers must be either ignorant or stupid.

Contributor

Jessica Holland

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Immortalization Commission: Science and the Strange Quest to Cheat Death by John Gray – review
John Gray's superb meditation on our desire for immortality makes for an enthralling read, says Richard Holloway

Richard Holloway

30, Jan, 2011 @12:04 AM

Article image
The Magic of Reality by Richard Dawkins - review
Tim Radford admires a brilliant introduction to science for children

Tim Radford

21, Sep, 2011 @8:00 AM

Article image
The 100 best nonfiction books: No 10 – The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins
An intoxicating renewal of evolutionary theory that coined the idea of the meme and paved the way for Professor Dawkins’s later, more polemical works

Robert McCrum

04, Apr, 2016 @4:45 AM

Article image
The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins | Book review
Richard Dawkins's latest broadside just misses its target, says Richard Fortey

Richard Fortey

04, Sep, 2009 @11:07 PM

Article image
Richard Dawkins the arch-atheist backs Michael Gove's free Bible plan

Author of The God Delusion says providing free Bibles to state schools is justified by its impact on the English language

Robin McKie, science editor

19, May, 2012 @8:30 PM

Article image
Reza Aslan on Zealot, Fox News and Richard Dawkins

Sophie Heawood: The US academic – whose latest book, Zealot, was a bestseller even before his extraordinary Fox News interview went viral – talks about religion, his celebrity status and death threats

Sophie Heawood

14, Aug, 2013 @5:14 PM

Article image
Here on Earth: A New Beginning by Tim Flannery – review
Tim Flannery argues that a rosy future for Earth is still possible, writes Marek Kohn

Marek Kohn

20, Mar, 2011 @12:05 AM

The Political Gene: How Darwin's Ideas Changed Politics by Dennis Sewell – review
Can Charles Darwin be blamed for the uglier consequences of his ideas, asks Ned Denny

Ned Denny

14, Nov, 2010 @12:04 AM

Article image
Video: Richard Dawkins on The Greatest Show on Earth

Richard Dawkins talks about why it's time for a book setting out the evidence for evolution, when calling someone ignorant isn't an insult, and how the media have made him into a militant atheist

Richard Lea and Andy Gallagher

21, Sep, 2009 @2:40 PM

Article image
Dawkins sees off Darwin in vote for most influential science book
A public poll to mark 30 years of the Royal Society book prizes sees The Selfish Gene declared the most significant – with women authors left on the margins

Claire Armitstead

20, Jul, 2017 @1:04 PM