And an update from Labor leader Anthony Albanese’s camp:

The main theme of that A Current Affair interview with prime minister Scott Morrison was based on his admission that he could be “a bit of a bulldozer”, and that he would change the way he does things. Scott Morrison 2.0 was born. But he bulldozed his way through the interview with “no regrets”.

The prime ministerial mystery tour continues:

A celebrity endorsement for Sophie Scamps, the independent candidate for Mackellar – Kamahl!

Good question from Grimshaw: How does getting boomers out of their four and five bedroom homes help first-time buyers in a much smaller market? If you take boomers out of their big homes, they are going to be looking in ... the same smaller, more affordable market that’s already overheated by first-time buyers.

Morrison says:

I think you’re misunderstanding the downsizing. We are talking about people who may have bought very modest homes ... three bedroom homes in suburbs like Guildford or Moonee Ponds. These are people who are able to downsize [and there will be] more housing stock on the market.

Morrison says that the plan to take money out of super actually keeps it in their super (yes.):

It keeps it in superannuation because you have to take the proceeds of the sale and put it back into your super. It’s not like earlier proposals that people have put forward in the past.

The difference here is that when you sell the house or perhaps ... if you choose to refinance, you take the capital, and the appreciated amount, and you put it back into your super.

Grimshaw pushes Morrison on the claim that super is people’s money... it’s for when they retire, she says. Morrison says:

I’m sorry, it is their money. It is their money. It’s not owned by the super fund, it’s not owned by the government, it belongs to them.

On the Coalition policy to let people raid their superannuation to buy a house, Grimshaw asks Morrison about the supply side. He says they’re dealing with that:

People buy new homes, they build new homes.

Grimshaw is pressing Morrison on the “bulldozer” descriptor.

Morrison says:

As prime minister [you] need to be able to have strength, you must have strength. The situations we are dealing with, whether it’s the Chinese government and their coercion of our economic interests and their pushing in to our region – you gotta have a strong prime minister. You can’t have weakness.

Morrison also says he has “no regrets” about cancelling the French submarine contract:

This was one of the most difficult agreements that Australia has ever been able to secure, and there is no easy way to tell a partner in the French government that they are no longer going to have a $90bn submarine contract.

Morrison says he “did the right thing on the day” when he refused to meet with women who were marching on Canberra. Asked about his women’s issues, he says:

Our policies, I think, have been very much focused on the practical issues. I accept that at times people may not have liked my language [but] the actual policies that we put in place have been getting very strong results.

Grimshaw: What could you have done differently?

Morrison:

I think I could have certainly been more sensitive at times, there is no doubt about that, that in terms of actual policy decisions, the one that I’ve mentioned on many occasions, I wish that I’d been, in hindsight ... if I’d been able to bring in [the military for the vaccine rollout] – we were doing it through the Health Department first – if we’d done it earlier ... I think that would have made a difference.

But that said, as always [there are] things, when you look back, that you learn from. But when things don’t go to plan, what we always sought to do as a government was to get back on it, fix what needed to be fixed, set the course right and get on with it.

Former prime minister John Howard has been put to work as the Liberal party hopes to trigger fond memories, Elias Visontay reports:

Psephologist Kevin Bonham’s take on the latest Resolve poll:

A teaser for tonight’s A Current Affair says host Tracy Grimshaw asks Scott Morrison:

Do you think you slightly over-egged the part about ‘I saved the country’?

Here’s a flashback to the last time the two went head to head, from Amanda Meade:

Yet another complaint lodged with the Australian Electoral Commission over campaign shenanigans – Natasha May reports:

A man has been arrested after police issued emergency declarations across two Brisbane suburbs.

Police were called to Hamley Street in Wooloowin around 1pm on Tuesday after a number of “suspicious items” were located there, sparking an emergency declaration to be issued under the Public Safety Preservation Act.

Police said “the exclusion zone” included 100m surrounding Hamley Street, including Adamson and Kedron streets.

Police have urged members of the public to avoid the area and for those within the exclusion zone to remain indoors until further notice.

A second emergency declaration has been issued for a number of streets in Coorparoo, including Stanley Street East, Tiber Street, Halifax Street, Milsom Street, Adina Street, Norman Avenue, Rome Street and Thackery Street.

It remains unclear what the suspicious items were.

Police have asked anyone with further information to contact Policelink by providing information using the online suspicious activity form.

A couple of snaps of the campaign trail action from AAP:

Today’s postcards from the campaign trail are in. Daniel Hurst, Josh Butler and Paul Karp have everything you need to know in the election briefing:

In a hard-hitting edition of A Current Affair, Tracy Grimshaw grills Scott Morrison tonight at 7pm on Channel 9 and 9Now.

With the federal election just four days away, and up to 1 in 4 voters undecided, viewers won’t want to miss this must-watch interview with the prime minister.

Josh Butler has been battling to get those texts, which were meant to be reports on his work:

Paul Karp has been on the road with the media pack following Scott Morrison. He’s giving Jane Lee the lowdown in today’s Campaign catchup:

7,873 Australians have died of Covid:

Paterson says there was a risk the deal would be leaked, and indeed some details were, and it had to be revealed to as few people as possible:

Because it was highly classified and highly sensitive negotiations that by the very nature of it couldn’t be revealed any more than on a need-to-know basis until it was signed, sealed and delivered.

Kelly asks Sharkie what she thinks about the competing housing policies from the major parties. Neither of them deal with the housing supply shortage, she says, and she’s not seeing anything substantial to deal with homelessness.

Sharkie confirms she would speak to the Coalition first, in the case of a hung parliament. She says she’s disappointed in both parties, and has several issues on her mind, but:

It is not a partisan view, I would talk with the government in the first place because they are the incumbent government.

Mayo MP Rebekha Sharkie is up now. She tells the ABC’s Fran Kelly that she doesn’t think a hung parliament is likely. The polls haven’t narrowed, she says, but either way she’s keen to give more pensioners the chance to work by changing the work test:

A hung parliament or not, I want to take this legislation to the parliament. So this is on the back of the work the national seniors have done around allowing pensioners to work.

If pensioners are going back into the workforce, even part-time, they would actually be putting money into the tax system, so I can’t see why the two major parties are not backing in the national seniors plan.

The ABC’s Greg Jennett puts it to Husic that Labor’s deficits would be higher than the Coalition’s.

“I don’t think you’re right,” Husic says. (Labor will release its costings on Thursday.)

Labor wanted to see the Coalition campaign launch first, he says, and that came “late”.

Labor’s Ed Husic is on the ABC talking about local manufacturing, after leader Anthony Albanese announced $1.5bn for medical manufacturing earlier today. Husic says they will prioritise local manufacturing but won’t be “closed minded” about it.

He says:

As we saw through the pandemic, the things we needed, particularly when our backs were against the wall, from a medical perspective – ventilators, PPE, medicine themselves – are really important, and we had big supply-chain vulnerabilities.

Video: Scott Morrison and Anthony Albanese’s super fight on costings:

Littleproud will also not be drawn on whether Scott Morrison’s lack of popularity is a drag on the vote, saying:

He put a few noses out of joint ... but he got stuff done. This guy’s got a bit of ticker.

(The word “ticker” has barely been heard since about 2005, when former prime minister John Howard said Labor’s Kim Beazley didn’t “have the ticker” for the top job.)

Deputy Nationals leader David Littleproud is refusing to be drawn on whether money being splashed around in the regions is anything to do with the “quid pro quo” over its deal with the Liberal party on reaching net zero (despite Sky News host Kieran Gilbert’s best efforts).

Littleproud says his party’s not taking anything for granted in Queensland, and that there’s “growing unease” about the chances of Australia “sleepwalking” into an Albanese government.

And on his colleague senator Matt Canavan declaring the net zero target was “dead”, Littleproud says:

Matt has his own view, it’s not one that the National party agrees with.

The Australian Council of Trade Unions says it has done the maths on the Coalition’s costings (NB: the Coalition is unlikely to agree with their conclusion):

In case you missed it earlier, here’s Sarah Martin’s piece on those public service cuts:

One in five Australians risked going to work while experiencing Covid-19 symptoms in order to make ends meet, research has found.

The Australia Institute surveyed 1,000 people in February and almost 20% admitted they left their homes “to the detriment of their own health and the health of their colleagues and the broader community”.

That percentage was higher among young employees (29%), who feared they couldn’t work from home, even while sick with the virus, in order to keep their jobs.

The institute’s Centre for Future Work director, Jim Stanford, said millions of workers had either used up their paid sick leave or were not entitled to sick pay:

There is no doubt this has contributed to the epidemic of people attending work with possible Covid symptoms.

More than a third of employed Australians have no access to statutory paid sick leave entitlements, including casual and self-employed workers.

The researchers called for governments to expand sick pay entitlements to cover all workers, including those in casual employment and the self-employed.

(Via Australian Associated Press)

Remember that part of the election campaign that was all about wage rises? Was it... last week?

Paul Karp reports that prime minister Scott Morrison has loosened up on the “loose unit” language:

Re: that post below about Howard – if this is the highlight, I won’t hustle too much.

Thanks so much to Amy Remeikis. I wish I was better at heeding her calls for self care.

But with only 4.5 days left, I reckon I’m gonna make it. OK, let’s see what this afternoon has in store. I just saw the tail end of an interview with former prime minister John Howard on Sky News. I’ll bring you that once I find the clip. Poor guy’s been wheeled out quite a bit on this campaign.

The campaigns are both on the move, with 4.5 days to go.

The wonderful Tory Shepherd will take you through the afternoon. I will be back with you early tomorrow morning.

Thank you to everyone who has followed along with me today – and for those who have asked me questions, I am doing my best to get back to everyone. Until tomorrow – take care of you Ax

It’s an empty chair situation.

There was talk the Reserve Bank of Australia was going to wait for the data we are getting over the next few days before making its rate decision, but obviously it moved ahead of those releases. But it will feed into the Fair Work Commission’s decision.

And it can have an impact on whether or not the RBA raises rates again.

It’s a big week for economic news. The Australian Bureau of Statistics will report the March quarter wages data tomorrow.

April’s unemployment rate will be out on Thursday, and on Friday the ABS will report how many businesses have opened and closed as well as the number of trading businesses and the rates of survival.

Labor is slated to announce its costings on Thursday.

Victoria’s new Aboriginal social and wellbeing centre has launched in Melbourne in a bid to provide culturally appropriate mental health services.

The centre, led by the Victorian Aboriginal community controlled health organisation, was a key recommendation in the state’s royal commission into mental health which handed down its final report in February last year.

Victoria’s mental health minister, James Merlino, said the state government was putting Indigenous communities “front and centre in redesigning our state’s mental health system”.

The acting Aboriginal affairs minister, Ros Spence, said the government was committed to ensuring First Nations communities had the “resources and the skills to continue to care for their communities”.

Simon Birmingham is pleased with how that press conference ended.

(FWIW, Anthony Albanese said at a couple of press conferences everyone would get a question, but he didn’t commit to doing it the whole campaign.)

Given the focus on costings and how the Anthony Albanese press conference ended (being chased over costings questions), Labor’s Jim Chalmers and Katy Gallagher are trying to get ahead of the attacks, releasing this statement:

The facts on the Morrison Government’s wasteful spending speak for themselves –

• The Morrison Government has taxed more, spent more and borrowed more than their Labor predecessor, but delivered much less.
• The Liberals are taxing more than the last Labor Government by every measure – in total, as a proportion of the economy, per person and adjusted for inflation.
• Taxes have been higher every single year under this Liberal Government than the level inherited from Labor.
• They are the second highest taxing government of the past thirty years – the highest was under John Howard.
• While they try to make a virtue of their tax-to-GDP cap, the fact is that the current cap has only been breached four times since Federation, and on every single occasion it was under the Liberals.
• The Liberals are spending more than their predecessor by $230 billion this year compared to the last Labor Government in 2013.
• Spending as a proportion of the economy averaged 24.9 per cent under the last Labor Government, but that’s risen to 26.5 per cent under the Liberals.
• The Liberal Government announced $70 billion in spending between the December update and the March Budget alone, without offsets.
• The Liberal Government committed $39 billion in its Budget without offsets.
• Analysis in the media indicates that the Liberals made $23.3 billion of announcements in the month after the 2022 Budget – which equates to $833 million a day.
• After promising surpluses in the first and every year, the Liberal Government has delivered more consecutive deficits than any government since the 1920s.

With this record, it’s not surprising that the Liberals doubled the debt before the pandemic began.

That press conference ended with Anthony Albanese leaving as questions were still being yelled about costings, and some journalists attempted to follow him.

Josh Butler was there and will have more for you

And the press conference ends.

Q: Is it fair for Australian voters to release it on Thursday? Does that give them enough time to be able to digest what you are offering and for us to scrutinise it?

Anthony Albanese:

Let’s be very clear here. You have an $80bn deficit at the moment. You have $1tn of debt. You had $70bn expended by this government.

You have our announcements, every single one of them, we have put a costing on. We’ve been transparent throughout the election campaign about those issues.

And the other thing that we have done in terms of fiscal responsibility is point out how fiscally irresponsible it is of the government to be promoting a policy which will lead to increased numbers of people potentially being reliant upon the pension, rather than their own superannuation savings. And I’ll conclude with this point: the costings and expenditures which we have made have been responsible.

They pale into insignificance compared with the waste and the rorts that are riddled through this budget: $5.5bn on French subs is more ... than any of the commitments that we have made during this election campaign, the largest of which is for childcare.

Q: Do you know whether your projected deficit is higher or lower than the Coalition’s?

Anthony Albanese:

We will announce that on Thursday. There’s no point announcing it now ... I want you to be there on Thursday. I don’t want to disappoint you.

Q: This morning, you mentioned your childcare policy. You said that there would be a return to government in productivity increases. Could you please detail the productivity increases you expect, separate from participation, which is well understood.

Anthony Albanese:

Thank you. Childcare does two things. One is ... workforce participation increases, so that you remove the disincentive that is there structurally towards women working a fourth or a fifth day at work. What that means is that those women have greater career opportunities to advance.

That means they earn more income. That means they pay more tax. That also means that the businesses, which is why our policy is supported so strongly by business, get productivity improvements. Because when you have a greater input in terms of the capacity of the workforce, that is one of the ways in which productivity grows. So this is if for individuals, it’s also good for businesses in terms of the growth which is there. This provides a considerable economic incentive ... participation is a good thing.

Q: You’ve said you’re going to be a prime minister who answers the questions. You’ve been asked this morning about deficits, higher or lower, and haven’t answered it ... Aren’t you doing exactly what you accused the prime minister of – not being transparent?

Anthony Albanese:

Not at all. And I’ll be at the National Press Club tomorrow.

Our costings policy will be released on Thursday. We’ve been very clear about that. But we’ve also, with every single announcement that we’ve made, we’ve attached dollars to it.

Q: You spoke admiringly today of modern Labor economics. Doesn’t the fact bear true that Keating cut manufacturing tariffs, exposing the industry to competition? What you’re doing is exposing the market.

Anthony Albanese:

What we’re doing here is providing a fund ... similar to the Clean Energy Finance Corporation model that has worked incredibly effectively, backing Australian industry, backing Australian jobs. This here works. And let me tell you what doesn’t work. It’s building a train that won’t fit on a station.

Q: The World Health Organization next week is meeting. On the agenda is clearly the formulation of what’s called a pandemic treaty, which will give the WHO greater control in how they dictate [how] other countries manage pandemics. Would you sign up to such a treaty?

Anthony Albanese:

What we have said is that we need, clearly, to strengthen the WHO and the way that it operates. One of our three pillars of our foreign policy is our alliance with the United States, engagement in the region, and support for multilateral forums. Today, one of the things that we’re about as well, and today’s announcement is about the response of the pandemic. That’s why we’re announcing today our support for medical manufacturing.

Clearly, one of the lessons of the pandemic is that we weren’t self-reliant enough.

Q: Mr Albanese, can you confirm the Labor deficit will be higher than the one unveiled by the Coalition today? Given that you’re running on bringing more transparency to government, do you think it’s fair for voters to go to the polls with less than 48 hours knowing what your detailed costings are just because that’s the way it’s always been done.

Anthony Albanese:

It is the way that it has always been done, including by the Coalition in 2010 and 2013. We can do without the interjections. You ask a question, and I answer it.

... Are you finished? When you’re finished, I’ll answer it. What we will do is outline all of our costings, all of our costings will be outlined on Thursday.

Q: The government has announced cumulative deficits over the next four years of $233 bn. Can you be fair dinkum with us and confirm that your deficits, over four years, that you’ll unveil on Thursday, will be higher?

Anthony Albanese:

We’ll unveil our plans on Thursday. But ...

Hang on. What we have done – throughout this campaign – let’s get real here. Let’s get real. This government made $70bn of announcements with no offsets. Not a dollar of offsets between December’s MYEFO and the March budget that they brought forward.

... Hang on. You get a chance to ask a question, then we have the answer. That’s the way it works, and everyone will be ... happier at home.

Q: You’re not giving us an answer.

Albanese:

Everyone will be happier at home. In terms of what this government has done is – $70 billion they have added. They will leave a legacy of $1tn of debt. Now, what we have done during this campaign is be responsible. We’ve been fiscally responsible in all of the statements that we’ve made, including today’s announcements ... We said what dollars would go, and we have done that throughout this campaign. We have a couple more announcements to go. We have until Saturday. But we will be releasing our costings announcement on Thursday.

Q: A disability employer here in Western Australia have announced they’re closing down their industrial work sites. As many as 700 disabled people may become unemployed. The government have, in their current NDIS plan, said they’re favouring mainstream employment for disabled people, as opposed to supported employment more like the industrial workshops. What’s Labor’s policy on that? Is your preference for mainstream or supported? And how does your NDIS plan address the issue of employment for people with disabilities?

Anthony Albanese:

Thanks very much. Look, this is a really serious issue. This is a serious issue that goes to the cuts that have occurred to the NDIS and goes to, as well, what has occurred in employment services.

This decision has been devastating for the people involved in those employment services, but also their families. This is a company that have been active in Western Australia for 70 years. They’ve survived all sorts of pressures, but they couldn’t survive the Morrison government.

We will do what we can to sit down and get advice about how these services can continue to operate. I know that, last night, families of people involved were ringing in to a radio interview I was doing on WA ABC here, expressing their real concern. This is about employment and engagement. It’s also the social interaction that comes with these services. And it is absolutely of real concern.

I’ve said, consistently, that the NDIS has one key difference between us and the government. That is, we understand that the NDIS is about people. It’s about the people who are involved in the scheme. And at the heart of it, what we want to do is, in all ways, encourage the fullest participation possible in society, including in employment, of people with a disability. What we understand is that that’s not only good for the people with disability – it’s also good for our Australian economy and for our society as well, to be inclusive. That’s our view.

Q: Will your costings be higher or lower than the $2.3bn that the Liberal party has outlined?

Anthony Albanese:

Our costings will be out on Thursday. They’ll be released at the same time that the last time that there was a change of government occurred. I’ll tell you what our costings won’t include – what they included on that couple of days before the election was $4.5bn of foreign aid cuts. We’ve seen how that damaged Australia’s standing in the region.

Over in the NT:

The Reserve Bank of Australia has released the minutes from its 3 May board meeting when the central banks surprised almost everyone and lifted its cash rate target from the record low 0.1% to 0.35%.

At the time, some prominent economists including Gareth Aird at the CBA said the RBA would hold off until its June meeting because governor Philip Lowe had repeated how he wanted to see the March quarter CPI and data on wages before moving. As the latter was not out until 18 May (tomorrow), Aird and some others assumed the first rate rise would not happen until the June (post-election) board meeting.

Anyway, today’s release of the minutes suggest that the members only considered three options, and all of them were for a rate rise. The 15 basis points option (which most economists predicted) was one of them, a 25bp option (which nobody picked, but was what the bank opted for), and an even higher increase to 40bp.

The smaller of the three was rejected as that stance was deemed “very stimulatory”, and was also inconsistent with an historical practice of raise rates in 25 bp moves. (A little surprising that history should be a factor since that 0.1% was a record.)

In its minutes, the RBA said:

An argument for an increase of 40 basis points could be made given the upside risks to inflation and the current very low level of interest rates.

In the end, the board opted for 25bp since that size “would help signal that the Board was now returning to normal operating procedures after the extraordinary period of the pandemic”.

And anyway since the board meets every month (save January), the RBA would “have the opportunity to review the setting of interest rates again within a relatively short period of time”.

As we saw in an earlier post here today, investors are predicting the RBA’s cash rate to climb at a rapid pace, reaching 3% by next March.

Oh, and what about wages? Well in the end, Lowe and other board members were satisfied with what they saw from the bank’s “liaison program” that found “labour costs were rising at a faster pace and that this was likely to continue”.

Looking ahead, growth in the [WPI] was forecast to be around 3.75% by the end of the forecast period, which would be the fastest pace since 2012.

Since that meeting, though, we’ve also seen the RBA’s quarterly monetary policy statement, which noted that it won’t be until 2024 – according to its forecasts – that wages will rise faster than inflation.

Worth keeping in mind given the recent political debate over what the Fair Work Commission will recommend for pay rises for those on the minimum wage. We’ll know who’ll be making that decision tomorrow, with a verdict due in late May or early June.

If you can help Luke out, let him know

I wanted to wait until the transcript came out because I wanted to include the questions, and here they are. Josh Frydenberg was asked about the Victorian Liberal MP Bernie Finn today and the state move to expel him from the party.

Frydenberg was not impressed with having to answer these questions:

Q: Should Bernie Finn leave? Should Bernie Finn leave the Liberal party now over his abortion comments?

Frydenberg: It might surprise you. I’m not up with every comment that Bernie Finn, as a state member of parliament, has said.

Q: No, but you’re the leader of the Victorian branch of the Liberal party and you’d be aware of the comments.

Frydenberg: Well, firstly, let me just say this to you. Decisions about the membership of the state parliamentary party will be ones that you can put to Matthew Guy, not to the federal deputy leader and the treasurer and the member for Kooyong.

Q: But I’m told the federal branch been involved in this motion.

Frydenberg: Again, I would say on state parliamentary matters. You leave that to Matthew Guy.

Q: I’ve spoken to Mr. Guy.

Frydenberg: OK, good. And I will focus on the national.

Q: That’s what he, that’s what he told me.

Frydenberg: I will focus on the national scene ahead of the election in just a few days time.

There are 17,228,900 Australians enrolled to vote.

And a big chunk of them want this all over and done with.

Yesterday it was housing and then darts with the over-50s.

Today it is housing and now tea with the over-50s

Sarah Martin has your Coalition costings covered:

The Coalition says spending cuts across the public sector will deliver $3.3bn in savings to pay for its election commitments, as the government turns the pressure on Labor to submit its plans to Treasury for costing.

The treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, and finance minister, Simon Birmingham, released the Coalition costings in Melbourne on Tuesday, revealing that the proposed increase to the public sector efficiency dividend and changes to super contributions would offset the $2.3bn in new spending promises made by the Coalition since the beginning of the election campaign.

This would deliver a $1bn improvement to the budget bottom line over the four-year forward estimates period, with $386m of this coming in 2024-24 when the deficit is forecast to be $42.5bn. Cumulative deficits over the next four years total $223bn.

Another week, another drop in the ANZ-Roy Morgan’s survey of consumer confidence.

This time it’s down another 1.3% to a level not seen since mid-August 2020. Only New South Wales and Queensland saw increases.

One measure, “Time to buy a major household item”, fell 2.7%, dropping 14.7% over the past three weeks – which of course coincides with the high CPI figure at the end of April and the subsequent RBA rate rise on 3 May.

ANZ’s Head of Australian Economics,David Plank, said the fourth week in a row of sinking consumer sentiment was “mainly driven by drops in the sub-indices that capture the financial situation compared to a year ago”.

“This suggests that cost of living concerns are front and centre for consumers,” Plank said. “Confidence was 2.7% lower for people who own their home, while it rose 0.5% for people who are renting”.

Household inflation expectations rose 0.2ppt to 5.3% amid higher petrol prices, and that’s an issue for the RBA because that’s what they are trying to avoid getting out of control. (Fuel prices above $2 a litre seem increasingly common in Sydney and Melbourne at least – so much for that 22.1 cent cut in the excise.)

Investors aren’t really budging on the prospect of a rapid run-up in the cash rate. Market economists are doubtful the rate will really rise another 1 percentage point by August from 0.35% now, but that’s what investors tip.

And spotted at Sydney Airport this morning, an “election sale”.

I’m wondering how many people think, yes, 21 May is the time for a spending spree ... other than politicians, of course.

We’ve heard a lot about Aukus from Scott Morrison this campaign – but what has moved on it?

Daniel Hurst reports:

Scott Morrison’s Aukus middleman has not lobbied any US officials since the landmark security deal was announced, despite a previous agreement with the prime minister “to engage with US personnel to facilitate Australia’s engagement with US and UK per Aukus agreement”, according to a newly filed document.

Prof Donald Winter, a former US navy secretary, was serving as the prime minister’s special adviser on naval shipbuilding when the deal to enable Australia to access America’s nuclear-propelled submarine technology was revealed.

A new filing to the US foreign lobbying register shows that, since the Aukus announcement, Winter has received about $62,560 from Australia’s Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet for “consultations re shipbuilding”.

Scott Morrison has spoken to Mix 104.9 in Darwin, about the change in chief minister from Michaela Gunner to Natasha Fyles and other local issues.

Morrison said he had congratulated Fyles and will work with the Northern Territory government, but urged voters to “support the [Country Liberal party] make the territory stronger” at the federal election. Asked about crime in Alice Springs, Morrison pointed to a $14m investment in programs including youth early intervention programs.

He said:

We need the territory government to get on top of law and order issues in the territory ... We’re willing to be a partner.

Morrison was also grilled on why petrol prices don’t seem to be coming down, despite the government halving the petrol tax in the budget, a cut of 22c per litre.

Morrison claimed there are “strong laws” to prevent petrol stations pocketing the savings and not passing them on to consumers, warning they “can be prosecuted” – but the enforcement solution was super vague, he asked territorians to report “specific bowser prices” to the competition regulator. Prices “will move around – they go up and down”, he said.

Just speaking for myself – I’m not sure how a person at the petrol bowser can tell if prices drop for a bit then increase whether they’ve actually received the benefit of the tax cut or been scammed.

Scott Morrison is now appearing on the Seven Network’s morning show (this is minutes after he appeared on the Nine Network’s morning show).

And he is once again defending the Coalition’s housing policy. Asked about the criticism of economic analysts that the policy will drive up prices, Morrison says:

Analysts usually own their own homes. I am trying to help people buy homes, it was hard 30 years ago, and it is harder now. It is really important that people have choices about how to use their own money. We are ensuring that once you have used your super to invest in your own home, after you sell your home down the track, or perhaps if you choose to refinance, then you can pay it back into your superannuation, but what you put into it, and the capital growth you had, and that is all tax-free, it is a good investment for your superannuation, get you into the housing market early. When you get to the end of your retirement, if you do not own your own home, then you do not own your own home, then you are worse off, so this enables us to achieve two goals, stronger retirement savings, and ensuring that Australians can own their own homes sooner with their own money, not having the government own your house.

(Technically the bank owns your home.)

And Labor’s main message, as distilled by Jim Chalmers:

The ... best way to understand that is that this government doubled the debt even before the pandemic. Now, they want to pretend that all of this debt in the budget is a consequence of the last couple of years. But they had doubled the debt before the pandemic and now they’ve multiplied the debt.

You know, they inherited debt a fraction of what they’re now saying is manageable. These were the same characters going around Australia saying that debt and net debt at $175bn was a debt and deficit disaster. Now, for the coming year, I think it’s $715bn or so.

And so, that gives you a sense of the change in debt levels under this government. The debt in this budget is not entirely a consequence of the pandemic. This government has an excuse for everything and a plan for nothing.

They take credit for things like commodity prices improving, but they don’t take responsibility for the fact that they wasted $5.5bn on submarines that will never be built; $20bn on pandemic support for companies that didn’t need it because their profits were going up; $1bn on marketing and advertising of the government itself. As far as the eye can see, rorts and waste and mismanagement. That’s why we don’t have enough to show for the $1tn in debt.

Here is more of that groundwork for a potential bigger budget deficit from Chalmers:

The most important thing here is not whether deficits are a couple of million dollars each year better or worse than what the Government is proposing. What matters most is the quality of the investments. We’d be inheriting $1tn in debt and no plan to grow the the right way. The difference between our approach to the budget and the government’s approach to the budget is we want to crack down on all their rorts and waste and mismanagement and we’ve suggested a few ways that we would begin that important task. But we would also be investing in growth and productivity and participation in areas like childcare and cleaner and cheaper energy and training more people for more opportunities. So that would be the difference.

On the costings timing fight the government is picking, Chalmers says:

That’s consistent with the practice that’s established. It’s entirely unsurprising, entirely consistent with the practice that the government, themselves, set a precedent for. That we would tally up and release our costings towards the end of the campaign. But what we have done is we’ve released an economic plan and a budget strategy some weeks ago so people can understand where we’re coming from when it comes to the economy.

Now, the government’s only just released most of their costings today in the final week of the campaign, in the 2019 election, they did it on the Thursday. In 2013, in 2010 they did it on the Thursday. You know, they desperately want Australians focused on the costings being released so that Australians aren’t focusing on the cost-of-living crisis that this government has delivered them courtesy of a decade of attacks on their real wages, which has seen real wages go backwards. The big issue in the economy is not the day that Labor releases the costings. It’s the cost-of-living crisis on Scott Morrison’s watch.

On Labor’s costings which will be released on Thursday, Jim Chalmers is laying the groundwork for what might be a bigger spending than the government by pointing out money the government as “wasted”:

Now, we have been working closely with the parliamentary budget office. We’ve sent costings to the parliamentary budget office, but some of our commitments are capped. Some of them come at no cost. Some of them are matching the Coalition. And so, what you’ll see on Thursday is a tallying of the commitments that we’ve made. Our responsible investments in a better future will cost the budget a fraction of what the Coalition has rorted and wasted over almost a decade in office. Our responsible investments are all about growing the economy the right way without adding to inflation, getting real wages moving again and making sure that Australians actually have something to show for this $1tn in Liberal debt.

Chalmers continued:

Now, tomorrow, we’ll get new numbers which show that the cost-of-living crisis is set to get worse in this country as real wages fall further and further behind. Economists expect the wages data tomorrow to show that Australian working families are falling even further behind on Scott Morrison and Josh Frydenberg’s watch. This is why they’re trying to is desperately to distract from their own failures. Real wages falling. Cost-of-living crisis. $1tn in debt with not enough to show for it and today we saw consumer confidence fall as well. This is the legacy of the Liberals and Nationals after almost a decade of waste and rorts and economic mismanagement. This is the legacy that they would be leaving an incoming government.

Jim Chalmers held a quick doorstop which started with what seemed a 10 minute speech.

Here is part of it:

This government has borrowed more, spent more and taxed more than the last Labor government, but delivered much less. Now, Josh Frydenberg and Simon Birmingham want to talk about delivery today. All this government’s delivered is a full-blown cost-of-living crisis, real wages going backwards and $1tn of debt that they had already doubled before the pandemic. You can’t take this government seriously on the economy or the budget given their record.

This Morrison government has become a laughing stock on the budget and the economy given the failures over almost a decade in office now. Now, what we see in the budget and what we see in the government’s costings today is a budget which is absolutely heaving with rorts and waste and $1tn in Liberal debt. Now, Josh Frydenberg and Scott Morrison, they want to bang on about Labor’s costings as a desperate attempt to distract from their own failures on the economy and on the budget.

Asked if Territorians should prepare for war, Scott Morrison speaks about defence spending. He holds up his stapled “plan for responsible economic management” papers for the third time and gives his stump speech before wrapping up as questions are still being yelled.

Q: The World Health Organisation meets on May 22 and on the agenda is a potential pandemic treaty to allow the WHO to direct countries in how they control pandemics. Would you consider signing up to that? And handing over any controls to the organisation?

Scott Morrison:

I have always been supportive right from the outset, and was criticised heavily, I stress, heavily, mocked in fact, by the Labor party, for saying that the WHO should have those powers and those authorities to be able to go and deal with pandemic situations, because we all know what happened at the start of this pandemic.

Well, the problem is we don’t know what happened at the start of this pandemic, and I was the one calling to ensure that we had an independent process to understand what happened so it couldn’t be repeated.

So I have been in the vanguard of those moves internationally to ensure that there is greater protection for world health to ensure that those world health authorities can come and understand what’s going on and be able to assist countries to be able to prevent the spread and outbreak of major infectious diseases. Now, we’ll look at the text of all of that. But we have been, amongst the countries that have been positive about these sorts of changes. You have to look closely at what the detail is in these things, as you always must.

But the idea that countries can just say – no, you can’t come in and have a look at a pandemic that’s about to break out and actually affect the public health and the economy of the entire world, as we saw with this pandemic, then I think it’s only sensible that that is an area of international cooperation.

And that is very, very important and I’ve been consistent on that. And remember, the Labor party mocked me for saying that that was a good idea.

Q: Are you concerned about a $1 an hour pay rise for low-paid workers but not arming first-homebuyers with $5bn of their super to buy $100bn of housing? And why won’t you release modelling on the price bump of the super policy?

Scott Morrison:

We are supportive of wage rises. We think that wage rises are good things and we want to see the wage rises to occur and for that to occur on a sustainable basis, and the best way for that to happen is to get unemployment down, ensure economy grows and that businesses are succeeding which enables them to provide sustainable wage rises for workers across this country. And the best way for those minimum wages, which I stress have gone up 7% minimum wage in Australia since we first came to government.

In seven out of the eight decisions on minimum wage, they’ve gone higher. Under Labor, three out of the six went down. So they talk a big game on this, but frankly, when they were in Government, they didn’t deliver one. They didn’t deliver one at all*.

(*Last week Morrison was suggesting Anthony Albanese would destroy the economy with one word “absolutely” in terms of supporting at least a 5.1% pay rise in line with inflation.)

So we’re for wage increases but it’s important that as the Fair Work Commission considers this, that they look at all of the moving parts and all of the moving factors. Because you don’t want people to take one step forward and then take two or three steps back because decisions lead to an even greater increase in the cost of living, or an even greater rise in interest rates and it all gets clawed back. See, that’s why this is so important. You’ve got to know what you’re talking about and you’ve got to understand how the economy works.

And if you don’t, as Mr Albanese as we know has been very loose on these issues, that impacts on your cost of living. It impacts on your interest rates. It impacts on your wages. It impacts on your ability to make your way or even buy your own home. If the government doesn’t know how to manage money, then that is going to impact on you. And that’s why this election is so important. And why responsible economic management is so important. Now, the treasurer addressed the other issues that you raised this morning so I’ll refer to his comments.

(So that is a no to modelling, again.)

Q: We’ve just got four days to go. The polling is not working in your favour every which way we look at it. Are the polls keeping you up at night, prime minister?

Scott Morrison:

No.

Q: You mentioned law and order in the Northern Territory. In Sydney, there’s been three gangland assassinations in Sydney had in a fortnight. The police say that it is the drug war. Why is neither side of politics in this election saying anything about drug importation and the security of our borders and drugs?

Scott Morrison:

I’d be happy to. We released our policy on those issues just a week ...

Q: People are being killed on the streets in Sydney.

I wouldn’t say that. I would say that battling crime and law and order issues is a challenge in every country in the world. The idea that there’s zero crime, I think, is a bit unrealistic. What we’ve done, as a government, is we have massively increased our investment in the federal police in particular to ensure that they’re working more closely with state authorities, whether it be in New South Wales or Western Australia or anywhere else in the country, to ensure that they have the tools.

I mean, we only have to go back to the major operation that we were involved in in disrupting gangland activity that we did with the FBI. That was one of the most significant multi-jurisdictional operations that our country has ever engaged in. And in fact, the FBI came here, I stood with one of the senior FBI directors, with me, and praised Australia for the work that our AFP had done and our local law enforcement authorities. The battle against organised crime – it never stops. It never stops.

And that’s why we have continued to invest in the capabilities we have to track down organised crime, to disrupt organised crime, to use the surveillance and technology that’s there to actually increase our capabilities, and not just on organised crime. But on paedophiles and on those who would seek to abuse our children online, and groom them, and we have been doing that in season and out, as a government, and made that a very big priority. Now, that is what our government has been doing.

That’s what we’ve been doing, each and every day – increasing our capacity to deal with law and order issues. But importantly, and Damian may want to speak to this because we were just down in Alice Springs recently. A very serious problem with law and order there. We sat down with the mayor. We worked out the right way to do that, which was a mixture of early intervention programs through to greater patrols and ensuring that we could deliver that on ground there in Alice Springs. So we’re coming to the table to try to solve these problems. But law and order here in the Territory – it’s a big problem. And we’ve been putting resources to it and support to ensure it can be addressed. And with Damian and Tina, that will continue.

Q: Prime minister, you mentioned earlier that there’s too much instability here in the Territory. What do you mean by that? And secondly, with this efficiency dividend, can you guarantee that the amount that the government spends, or departments spend on consultancies and contractors won’t increase in the next Coalition government?

Scott Morrison:

Well, see, the way an efficiency dividend works is when you’ve got some $327bn of expenditure, with public service chief executives, secretaries, responsible for managing that, they are the best people to make the decisions about how they achieve those savings. That’s their job.

That’s what they’re tasked to do. That’s what you do. You task your public servants to get the job done and I respect those who work in the public service, but I also expect results.

Respect and expect, that’s been my charter with the public service that I’ve led. And that means that they will make the sensible decisions about the best way to achieve that. And we were talking about $2.7bn and ensuring that departments themselves are making the appropriate contributions when it comes to the retirement incomes of their own super schemes, which are quite different to the rest of the country, including the politicians, I can add. So, they will make those decisions, and they’re tasked to make those decisions, and I believe they’ll make good decisions to make that. And it’s eminently sensible. And the second part of the question?

(Instability in the NT.)

We’ve had further changes here. I worked very closely with Mr Gunner and there are serious issues in the Northern Territory. We want the Territory to be safe. We want it to be safe.

I don’t hear the follow up but the answer is:

Of course it is. The Chinese government is a concern.

Q: Prime minister, the Coalition is speaking about the budget bottom line today. Do you agree that’s likely cold comfort for Australians who are worried about their own family budgets, their household budgets? And also, their wages and aren’t we expecting to see real wages go backwards tomorrow?

Scott Morrison:

Well, we’ll wait to see what the figures say tomorrow, just like we’ll wait to see what the unemployment figures say on Thursday.

But that is why we responsibly managed the economy, so we can cut tax in half and provide that immediate relief. Our budget has turned around by more than $100bn in the last 12 months.

That is the single biggest turn yarned in a budget in 70 years and that has enabled us to provide that immediate cost-of-living relief right now, the extra $250 for pensioners, extra tax relief on 1 July and the halving of the petrol tax, the extension of the commonwealth seniors’ health canrd to another 50,000 Australians, to ensure that we’re freezing the deeming rates so people on fixed incomes can have surety about their pensions and what they’ll receive during what are times when cost-of-living pressures are being applied and ensuring that we’re dropping the cost of non-concessional pharmaceuticals under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme by $10 a script ...

Q: But that’s what today, as you say ... tax those measures are temporary.

Morrison:

Tax relief is not temporary*. In the next term, will not pay more than 30 cents in the dollar if you earn anywhere between $45,000 and $200,000 a year.

That is one of the biggest changes to our personal income tax system that our country has ever seen. That’s bringing it down from 32.5 cents to 30 cents for many and 37 cents down to 30 cents for many others.

That is real, lasting change, which enables Australians to keep more of what they earn and the other thing we’re not just letting them keep more of what they earn.

We’re allowing them to have more control of what they’ve saved to ensure that they can access their own savings in their own superannuation, that will help them be able to achieve what they’re looking to achieve, which is to buy their own home.

... That also ensures that when you’re investing in your own home through your super, you don’t pay tax on the capital gains. You don’t pay tax on the earnings. You do pay tax when it’s in your superannuation account.

So when the earnings from the capital and the principle amount goes back into superannuation, it goes back tax free. This is why it’s a smart and good investment. I don’t think it’s a gamble to buy your own home.

I think it’s the smartest thing that you and your family can do. I don’t agree with the Labor party that it’s a gamble. I believe it’s the best and smartest thing you can do. And the only way you will be able to get access to your own superannuation, to be able to buy your first home is by voting CLP here, LNP in Queensland, by voting Liberal and National, because the Labor party, they hate this.

They want big union funds to control your money. I want you to control your money.

(*The low and middle income tax offset is temporary.)

Q: Prime minister, you credited the public service with helping Australia get through the pandemic, the once-in-a-century pandemic. The savings you’re seeking here are $1bn over four years. In the context of a deficit, that’s nearly $80bn. Isn’t this a mean-spirited way of rewarding them for hard work?

Scott Morrison:

No. This is responsible budgetary management. We’ve made commitments in this election and we ensured that we pay for them. That’s how you manage your budget. You live within your means. At this election, we’ve been responsible in the commitments that we’ve made and it’s important that we make very clear how we pay for them. Now, as I said, it’s a budget of $327.3bn, which is where we’re seeking to save $2.7bn off on departmental expenses, so how they use accommodation, how they manage their administrative expenditure. That is something that I think is entirely sensible and frankly taxpayers would be demanding, that these types of sensible efficiencies are achieved and that is part of the process of managing a good budget.

Q: Prime minister, your government says it will achieve a $1bn improvement to the budget bottom line through public sector service efficiencies. Can you confirm which departments or agencies will be targeted by cuts? And also will the ABC continue to have its funding cut?

Scott Morrison:

Well, the ABC is not having its funding cut. I don’t know why you’re suggesting it is. The ABC’s funding actually increases. That was set out in the Budget. To suggest that ABC’s funding is being cut is just completely false* and the ABC continues to not be subject to that dividend which was set out by the treasurer and the finance minister this morning.

The efficiency dividend is less than what the Labor had when they were last in government and the efficiency dividend applies to departmental expenditure. It doesn’t apply to programs. So we’re saying we’ll be in a position to realise some $it 2.7bn in savings off a departmental expenditure Budget of $327.3bn.

Now, if our senior public servants – and they’re paid well – if they can’t find $2.7bn out of a budget of $327.3bn, well, I’ve got a lot more confidence in them that they can achieve that.

This is a sensible, practical measure which has, I think, been responsibly applied to ensure you responsibly manage your expenditure. It doesn’t impact on programs or services at all. It never has. And we’ve ensured particularly the key agencies that are in areas of national security and smaller agencies for whom those sorts of things can have a bigger impact and there’s a long list of them – I won’t go through a list here to detain a press conference, but that information was released in details today. That’s the difference with us.

We’re very transparent. We had a Budget before we went into this election and we’ve been very transparent about our costings all the way through. Why? Because we know how to manage money and we’re confident about that and that’s why we’ve maintained our AAA credit rating over these most difficult years. There’s been no government in this government’s history that has had to face the economic pressures and maintained the AAA credit rating**, as we have.

(*The ABC’s funding which had been set out by the previous government was wound back by the Coalition when it came to power, so its funding did not increase by the amount it had planned for, which led to the broadcaster having to make cuts.)

(**The Labor government maintained the AAA credit rating throughout the global financial crisis.)

Josh Frydenberg has been appealing to his Kooyong electorate by speaking about what he says is the government’s record on lowering emissions.

Environment and climate editor, Adam Morton, has already factchecked this and found it to be misleading.

Reality: True, according to official government data – but the statement is misleading. Nearly all the cut happened when Labor was in power between 2007 and 2013, and most of that was due to state policies that slowed the country’s extraordinary pace of forest destruction for agriculture, particularly in Queensland. Government climate data suggests Australia is still clearing native forests, just at a slower pace (though there is some evidence that emissions from the land may be higher than reported).

Fossil fuel emissions – the main game – were rising before the Covid-19 lockdowns hit due to increases from transport, mining and major industry. Government projections suggest those sectors will do little to reduce their impact before 2030 under current policies.

On the Coalition’s housing policy, Josh Frydenberg repeated what he said this morning on ABC RN, that it will have a “material” impact on housing prices. This is after the superannuation minister, Jane Hume, admitted that in the short term, she would expect it to cause a temporary “bump” in prices.

If the 100,000 first-homebuyers were able to access the maximum $50,000, that’s a $5bn addition from super into the housing market. And that is why the Property Council have said that this is fairly targeted and that they’re not expecting to see an inflationary impact on prices that is material. That is the key point.

There are a few important developments in aged care this morning. A new report from the University of Technology Sydney Ageing Research Collaborative has warned the sector is struggling to improve its critically low staffing levels, despite the enormous “community and political pressure” in the wake of the royal commission.

The report finds just 5% of residential facilities would be able to meet the average minimum staffing standards legislated as a response to the royal commission’s recommendations. Staffing in residential homes had grown by just 1.9% in 12 months, the report said.

The problem was mirrored in home care – a critical sector in relieving pressure on the residential system – where average staffing time has continued to fall, dropping 32% in five years. Meanwhile, the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation says 70% of its members have not received the promised $800 staff bonus announced by the Morrison government in January.

The prime minister, Scott Morrison, announced in January up to $800 would be made available to aged care workers through a bonus scheme designed to recognise their efforts in the pandemic and stem the loss of workers from the sector.

The scheme, which pays out a pro rata bonus in two instalments of up to $400, began taking applications in March. The government asked the underfunded aged care sector to stump up the cash for their workers prior to receiving approval, a design critics say has created a barrier to access.

It found 71% have not received any of the two promised bonuses. About one in five workers have received one payment and only 2.7% have received both.

Josh Frydenberg is now gathering his folders as he finishes answering a question over who had permission to put up election signs and murals on buildings in Kooyong and who didn’t.

The corflute wars continue.

Josh Frydenberg then steps in to give the message which is the reason for this press conference:

The bottom line is this – the Coalition has been responsible with respect to both our economic management and the way we’ve managed the costings process through this campaign, putting forward 35 policies for independent costing and verification by the departments of Treasury and Finance.

Anthony Albanese has been irresponsible and has lacked transparency and is running away, hiding from proper scrutiny, because he’s put zero – zero – policies forward for independent costing by Treasury and Finance.

He is simply hiding from the Australian people the fact that under, under Labor, taxes will be higher, deficits will be larger, and debt will be higher. And he is not prepared to do what the Coalition has done, which is to put our policies forward in a responsible way for independent costing and verification.

It was Bob Hawke’s government which introduced the efficiency dividend, for those playing at home.

Simon Birmingham, who has been in a government which doubled debt before the pandemic, manages to say all of this with a very straight face:

The difference, really, is not so much in the savings. It’s the fact that we have made sure that our policies live within our savings envelope. Labor’s policy blow vastly outside whatever savings they’ve got. Labor’s policies will see the budget deficit and debt balloon and Mr Albanese will probably deign to take some questions from journalists today*. And when he does, if he does, he should actually today admit that Labor will run higher deficits and higher debt, that under him, he shouldn’t just admit they will, but he should ‘fess up and say how much. Fess up, Mr Albanese and acknowledge you’re going to be running bigger deficits and tell Australians just how much more debt you’re going to pile on to them.

(* Anthony Albanese, like Scott Morrison, has held press conferences on almost all the days he has been on the physical campaign.)

Simon Birmingham on efficiency dividends (cuts):

The opportunities for departments, which they’ve demonstrated time and time again in meeting efficiency dividends exist in relation to management of their accommodation, their properties, management of technology, management of consultants and contractors, management of staffing arrangements. These in no way impact the delivery of services and support to Australians.

Essential services remain guaranteed under the Coalition. We have lifted Medicare bulk billing rates.

We’ve fully funded the NDIS and we’ve grown investment in areas of mental health in aged care and schools, etc. This is about public sector administration, administration by government departments.

The Labor party themselves have indicated around $3bn worth of public sector savings that they seek to pursue as well. They’ve tried to be more prescriptive, suggesting that somehow that can only be achieved by one means.

We have outlined an efficiency dividend that’s been used by Labor and Liberal governments before, that provides the abilities for heads of public sector agencies to find the most effective way to meet and achieve those efficiencies. It’s a very safe and reliable way of achieving modest savings.

Josh Frydenberg (who looks exhausted) is hoping this is the message which gets out:

Ask yourself the single question – and hopefully 26 million are asking the simple question – why has Labor not put forward these policies for costings? Why? There’s no reason other than they do not want to be subject to scrutiny. We know they will spend more.

We know they will tax more. We know they will deliver a budget after the next election. But they’re not telling the Australian people before they vote what will be in that budget.

And we have detailed where all these spending pressures are with respect to Labor’s commitments.

And we also know from recent experience what Labor will do to fund these increased commitments. They will put in place higher taxes*. So we have been both accountable and responsible, in putting our policies forward for costing.

(*Labor governments have taxed less in the last 30 years than either the Howard government or the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison government.)

And today, we are reconciling our spending commitments with the efficiency dividend which will more than offset those spending commitments and again improve our budget bottom line. You have not seen the same responsible approach from the Labor party.

Simon Birmingham also strays off costings to say this:

Even this morning we saw the lack of accountability or transparency. At 6.49am, Bill Shorten said that Labor’s costings will be released this Thursday. At 6.50am, the Shadow Treasurer, Mr Chalmers, sneaky Jim Chalmers, wouldn’t say when Labor’s costings would be released.

At the last election he was honest enough as Labor leader to outline $387bn worth of higher taxes, to pay for Labor’s spending, and today at least he’s been honest enough to reveal that Labor will drop their costings at the absolute last minute at this election campaign.

But Jim Chalmers and Anthony Albanese, they’re trying to hide their costings, hide their spending, and hide their higher taxes. Australians should know they cannot trust Labor and this demonstrates our plan released today, they can trust the coalition for lower taxes and responsible budget management.

Josh Frydenberg then strays into non-costings territory:

During this election campaign Anthony Albanese has been found out. That he is not up to the job. In an election campaign about jobs, he didn’t know the unemployment rate. In an election campaign about cost of living, he didn’t know the cash rate. In an election campaign about economic management, he and the Labor party have not put forward one policy for independent costing by Treasury and Finance. In clear contrast with the Coalition, who have put forward 35 policies for costing by Treasury and Finance.

And Australians who are already voting can go to the Treasury and Finance website and see those independent costings ahead of delivering their vote.

So this is an important election. We know the Coalition will deliver a strong budget bottom line and a stronger economy. And the Labor party who will always spend more, who will always tax more, who will dust off the $387bn of higher taxes from the last election to pay for their commitments at this election.

(This is the second highest taxing government in the last 30 years, the first being the Howard government. Debt had doubled before the pandemic.)

John Howard is robo-calling people:

The Coalition is banking on having a better costings bottom line. Labor is hoping people will be willing to have a conversation about “quality” spend.

Penny Wong:

I think voters care about ensuring we’ve got quality spend in our budget. That we actually do the right thing with the money that taxpayers provide to the federal government. That we grow the economy. That we provide more funding for skills, that we support more childcare – access to childcare – because of the benefit of that. I do think that voters care about that. Our policies have been very clear about that. Ultimately, this election – do you want more of the same? Do you want to give Mr Morrison another three years? Or do you want something better?

Then on to costings, which Penny Wong says will be released “in the usual way”;

I can remember when I was finance minister, if you can remember back that far, the coalition in opposition released theirs on the Thursday before the election. Which is what we would propose to do.

Q: So you’ll be releasing it on Thursday.

That’s what we said. What I would say is this – though. We’ve got wages data out tomorrow. We’ve got a prime minister who, you know, is pretty desperate about losing his job. Of course they’re going to try to make this even issue. They don’t want to talk about the cost-of- living crisis. They don’t want to talk about the housing crisis. They don’t want to talk about the fact they’ve got $1tn of the debt, they’re taxing more than any government in history.

Penny Wong compared the policies (Labor’s shared equity scheme is open to 10,000 people)

Who are we helping? Who is Mr Morrison, apart from helping himself, who is he saying this policy will help? People with enough super. A lot of young people don’t have enough super.

A lot of women don’t have enough super. We’re saying we’ll help this end of the market, people who can’t otherwise afford to buy to buy. We want to bring more housing onto the market.

We think there’s a role for federal government in housing. This is the problem - the coalition doesn’t think that. We’ve got a housing Australia fund which will build more houses, more affordable houses, more social housing, bring more housing onto the market.

Penny Wong was also out and about this morning. She spoke to ABC News Breakfast about the costings (the Coalition is releasing theirs very soon). But first Wong had some things to say about Morrison’s housing plan:

Look, this is a desperate plan from a desperate prime minister who wants to change the topic and wants to make Australians think that after nine years of being in government, after presiding over housing crisis and presiding over declining affordability, that somehow he really does care about this issue. Now he wants to gamble your super, the superannuation scheme, on a policy that won’t help people to buy. It won’t help people to buy. I think you may have asked Mr Sukkar about Mr Falinski’s report, yesterday we saw Jane Hume driving a bulldozer through the bulldozer’s policy. It will increase housing prices.

Scott Morrison has given an interview with the Australian newspaper where he has laid out his latest pitch to voters – vote for me because there is a lot of stuff on next week (Quad meetings and the like) and procedures are already in place:

“We know what we will do on Monday; we know what we will do on Sunday,” Mr Morrison told The Australian in an exclusive interview in Brisbane on Monday.

“We know what we have to do on the national security side. We know what we have to do on the Quad for that meeting on Tuesday.”

He indicated there were “conventions” to cover such important meetings if the election result was unclear after the Saturday poll.

Josh Frydenberg was asked on ABC radio this morning what he thought about Scott Morrison’s assertion last night on 7.30 that electorates with teal independent challengers were not as impacted by economic shocks. Essentially he was saying they were wealthy enough to worry about things like climate change and integrity, because they didn’t have to worry about money.

Kooyong is one of those electorates. Frydenberg said:

Well, differently electorates have different priorities within those electorates. In my electorate, economic management is absolutely critical.

For example, 30,000 people in the electorate had to receive the jobkeeper a payment. Around 7,000 businesses small businesses received the cash flow boost. Around 8,000 pensioners received the $250 payments that we recently announced.

So those economic initiatives, including the 60,000 taxpayers in Kooyong who received tax relief as a result of our measures, you know, my community like other communities, that are sharing the benefits of strong Coalition economic management, and they’re also interested in our policies going forward. That being said, they’re also focused on climate change.

And what I’ve explained to people in my electorate as recently as a candidates forum last night was, was that our policies have delivered a 20% reduction in emissions based on 2005 levels, which is a higher reduction than what we’ve seen in many other comparable countries

Ita Buttrose:

We will retain an internal system of editorial complaint handling. We accept the recommendations, but we have amended one already. The review recommends that the ombudsman should report directly to the board. We should report to the board and the managing director, but the directors felt that this would simply be continuing the system we already have and we wanted a different more independent approach. So the ombudsman will report directly to the board and the process will be separate from editorial management.

Katharine Murphy has seen some polling showing Labor has the potential to make gains in Queensland:

Labor is deploying frontbencher Penny Wong to the electorates of Brisbane and Higgins in the final days of the election campaign, as the opposition becomes increasingly bullish about its prospects in the Liberal-held seats due to voter disaffection with Scott Morrison.

Strategists say Labor’s internal polling points to opportunity in four Liberal-held seats – Brisbane and Ryan in Queensland, Bennelong in Sydney and Higgins in Victoria – because disapproval of Morrison is high in these electorates and disaffected centrist progressive voters don’t have a teal independent to back.

Guardian Australia understands in private YouGov seat polls, 58% of respondents in Ryan, 57% in Bennelong, 62% in Brisbane and 65% in Higgins disapproved of Morrison’s performance as prime minister when asked whether they had a positive or negative view of the Liberal leader.

Back to Radio RN Breakfast, Josh Frydenberg is asked why Scott Morrison isn’t on his election signage.

There’s a lot of signage of me because I’m the candidate, he says.

Asked again, he says;

It is my name and my name only on the ballot box.

The Liberal campaign is in Darwin this morning. They believe they can win Lingiari.

Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, has told Radio National the Coalition will impose a further 0.5% “efficiency dividend” on the public sector, cutting $2.7bn from government departments and agencies that develop policy and deliver services to help achieve a total saving of $3.3bn.

He said:

The way the efficiency dividend works is it’s up to departmental heads to find those efficiencies ... The annual departmental bill is $327bn, what we’re saying is it will be reduced to $324bn ... They are best placed to work out how they will find efficiencies.”

Frydenberg noted that Labor also had an efficiency dividend when it was last in office.

Frydenberg claimed that Labor’s policies, such as urgent care centres have not been properly costed, and Anthony Albanese was forced to retract the claim it had been independently costed by the PBO.

Asked about Jane Hume’s comments that tapping superannuation for housing would cause a temporary “bump” in prices, Frydenberg pivoted to noting that first home buyers would bring forward their purchase.

Frydenberg relied on the Property Council for claims property prices won’t rise much. He noted the policy is estimated to add $5bn to the housing market, which would not have a “material” impact on the housing market.

Part of the Coalition’s costings include efficiency dividends – which is just another way of saying cuts.

Where from? Josh Frydenberg can’t say. That will be up to departmental heads.

He told ABC Radio RN:

Well, the way the efficiency dividend works is it’s up to departmental heads to to find those efficiencies within their own organisation.

The treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, and finance minister, Simon Birmingham, will release the Coalition’s costings in Melbourne this morning.

The costings will show a budget improvement of $1bn over four years, which is peanuts, really, given in the 2022 budget the government chose to spend $70bn of the $100bn improvement in the bottom line. The $1bn saving is largely driven by a public sector efficiency dividend, or, in plain English: cuts to agencies that develop policy and deliver services.

The government will use the occasion to reheat claims that Labor is fiscally irresponsible, citing claims it would have spent $81bn more during the pandemic a factoid based on heroic assumptions about how much Labor would’ve boosted jobseeker. It also conveniently ignores the $40bn of jobkeeper given by the Coalition to companies that didn’t meet the revenue downturn threshold.

The Coalition is also targeting Labor for having not yet submitted its policies to the Parliamentary Budget Office for costing, leaving it to the dying days of the campaign - the same trick Tony Abbott pulled before the 2013 election.

Frydenberg said:

We have submitted 35 policies for costing yet Labor has submitted none. Labor can’t manage money and to avoid proper scrutiny they have not submitted their costings for independent verification and publication during the campaign.

Birmingham said:

The Morrison government will always pursue opportunities to strengthen the budget while growing the economy and guaranteeing essential services.