Howard ministers considered extinguishing native title over SA site earmarked for nuclear waste dump

Cabinet papers 2002: documents shed light on strategy amid decades-long battle to create national storage centre

John Howard’s government considered extinguishing native title over a South Australian site earmarked for a nuclear waste dump “by agreement or by compulsory acquisition”, the 2002 cabinet papers reveal.

The records, released on Sunday by the National Archives of Australia, shed light on the Howard government’s part in the decades-long battle to create a national storage site for Australia’s low- and medium-level nuclear waste.

The Keating government began searching for a site to store the nation’s nuclear waste as early as 1992.

In 2012 the Gillard government passed a controversial bill to create the nation’s first nuclear waste dump – saying it hadn’t yet decided on a location, although many believed it was destined for remote Aboriginal land in the Northern Territory.

Now preliminary works have started on a site at Napandee, near Kimba in South Australia, after the Morrison government resources minister Keith Pitt declared native title had been extinguished there.

The legal and political obstacles were apparent in 2002 when the finance minister, Nick Minchin, and science minister, Peter McGauran, brought their submission to cabinet.

They proposed that federal laws should be used to override SA laws that would ban the establishment of a dump, and that Indigenous land use agreements could be used to override native title.

If native title parties had not “agreed to the surrender of their native title through an ILUA”, the government should consider compulsory acquisition, they said.

Cabinet noted that “the extinguishing of native title, whether by agreement or by compulsory acquisition, is likely to raise difficult issues”.

The cabinet submission noted there were “strong imperatives” for “the safe keeping of hazardous radioactive waste materials” that arise from medicine, industry and research. The waste is now stored at Lucas Heights outside Sydney, and more than 100 institutions across the country.

“Given the sensitivity of the project and the need for certainty of tenure that provides exclusive use of the site for the duration of the project, there appears to be no practical alternative to the extinguishment of native title,” the submission said.

But the government would need to provide “benefits” in return, and be prepared for legal challenges. The submission also suggested a media strategy, saying that ruling out having intermediate waste (leaving just low-level waste) would “deprive the SA government of the argument the national repository was the thin end of the wedge, and that the government has a hidden agenda to site the national intermediate waste store in the state”.

The current government plan is to use the Napandee site as permanent storage for low-level waste, and temporary storage for intermediate-level waste (the long-term plan for the intermediate waste is not clear).

The prime minister’s department agreed with the 2002 plan, while the Attorney General’s Department supported it, but said there was not enough information to work out whether “security measures will be sufficient to prevent access to the repository for the purpose of terrorist or other criminal activity”.

The Department of Foreign Affairs warned of the “distinct” possibility of “dirty bombs”, in the wake of the September 11 attacks. A dirty bomb is where an explosive is used to scatter radioactive dust.

The Department of Defence had “serious concerns” about the initial proposal to use Woomera for storage.

“A principal concern is the risk of a weapon impact on the national repository as well as the negative publicity that would result,” the department said.

The traditional owners of the Napandee site, the Barngarla people, are still fighting the federal government in court. The SA premier, Peter Malinauskas, has said he supports their cause.

The federal resources minister, Madeleine King, has said the waste “cannot continue to build up”, and has committed to working with the Barngarla people to protect the site’s cultural heritage.


Tory Shepherd

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Indigenous owners outraged at site earmarked for Australia’s first nuclear waste dump
Traditional owners describe backing for facility on South Australian cattle station beside Indigenous cultural site as ‘cultural genocide’

Calla Wahlquist

29, Apr, 2016 @6:58 AM

Article image
Liberal MP says search for Aukus submarine nuclear waste dump site in his electorate is premature
Rowan Ramsey ‘amazed’ government starting selection process in 12 months, given 33-year life of Virginia-class reactor

Paul Karp

14, Mar, 2023 @2:00 PM

Article image
Australia’s nuclear waste is growing as battle over dump site heats up
Government says nuclear waste cannot continue to build up and it will work with traditional custodians of proposed Kimba site

Tory Shepherd

13, Oct, 2022 @11:30 PM

Article image
Spectre of Maralinga hangs over Aukus nuclear waste for Indigenous communities
The question of where to store waste from submarines is exacerbating trauma caused by British atomic testing in South Australia in the 50s and 60s

Sarah Collard and Donna Lu

18, Mar, 2023 @7:00 PM

Article image
South Australia nuclear waste dump could face roadblock in Senate
Native title holders will travel to Canberra to lobby senators against the dump, saying they were excluded from community vote on the facility

Sarah Martin Chief political correspondent

25, Feb, 2020 @4:30 PM

Article image
Nuclear waste: residents near proposed dump told to sign draconian code of conduct
Code bans residents from taking notes or recording any part of meetings without prior agreement

Calla Wahlquist

08, Aug, 2019 @12:53 AM

Article image
Australia may have to stop making key cancer medicine if it doesn’t build nuclear waste dump, peak body says
Ansto chief says it may not be able to keep producing nuclear medicine if it runs out of waste storage space at its Lucas Heights facility

Tory Shepherd

17, Nov, 2022 @2:00 PM

Article image
Feuds and infighting as nuclear waste dump plan tears communities apart
Representatives from six sites flagged by the Australian government as possible locations for the nation’s radioactive waste have taken their fight to Canberra. But back home, the proposal is turning friends and neighbours against each other

Shalailah Medhora

01, Mar, 2016 @6:16 AM

Article image
'The most divisive thing': two small towns brace for a vote on nuclear waste
Whatever the result, the communities on South Australia’s Eyre peninsula are split over the issue – and will be for some time

Calla Wahlquist

26, Oct, 2019 @7:00 PM

Article image
Traditional owners apply for judicial review to stop South Australia nuclear waste dump
Barngarla people say they were never consulted over the project which ‘should never be built’

Tory Shepherd

07, Dec, 2021 @7:55 AM