Alan Tudge denies he was responsible for department’s failure to check legality of robodebt, royal commission hears

Former human services minister says he was away on leave when an article casting doubt on legality of robodebt was sent to him

Former human services minister Alan Tudge has denied he was responsible for his department’s failure to check the legality of the robodebt scheme, telling the royal commission the issue didn’t cross his mind “until I read about it in the newspaper” years later.

Tudge, who held the role at the initial height of the scandal in 2017, told the inquiry he never asked for or saw legal advice on the robodebt scheme and he had been focused on fixing its practical issues, rather than its budget savings.

He said he understood the “income averaging” method central to the scheme could cause inaccurate debts, but he didn’t consider its legality because it had been through a “rigorous” cabinet process involving lawyers in two government departments.

I didn’t know the full context in relation to the legalities,” he said. “It just had not crossed my mind until I read about it in the newspaper, I think, following the federal court case.”

The royal commission is investigating why and how the unlawful Centrelink debt recovery scheme was established in 2015 and ran until November 2019, ending in a $1.8bn settlement with hundreds of thousands of victims.

Tudge oversaw the robodebt scheme’s implementation between February 2016 and December 2017, including its largest ramp-up in late 2016, which was part of a Coalition election commitment for billions in budget savings.

With the scheme generating controversy in January 2017, the then prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, sent Tudge a Sydney Morning Herald article by Peter Martin, which raised the prospect that robodebt’s use of “income averaging” was unlawful.

Under questioning by senior counsel assisting Justin Greggery KC, Tudge said he had been on holidays in the UK with his family when the article was sent to him.

“When I came back [I] was very much focused on the implementation of the scheme,” he said. “There were a number of issues being raised in the media … That was my intense focus in January and February.”

Greggery said it would have been easy for Tudge to “refute” the suggestions of illegality by “simply saying, ‘Where’s the advice?.’”

“This was a program … which gone through a cabinet process,” Tudge said. “A cabinet process is a rigorous process … Social services’ lawyers would have had to form a view that it was lawful. Then on top of that the attorney general’s department has to form a view.”

Tudge, who acknowledged he had a law degree but never practised, was asked about a keynote speech given by the eminent silk Peter Hanks KC at an administrative law conference in June 2017. Hanks said the robodebt scheme was unlawful.

Greggery said the then secretary of the Department of Human Services, Kathryn Campbell, and the department’s then chief counsel, Annette Musolino, had been briefed on the comments.

Tudge told the royal commission he was unaware of Hanks and had not seen the speech but he would have expected Musolino to check the legality of the scheme with the Department of Social Services, which was responsible for social security law.

Greggery said that if steps to check the legality of the scheme weren’t taken at this stage, that was ultimately Tudge’s responsibility as minister.

“I don’t accept the proposition that I was responsible for an individual not making a choice to not raise a matter with her counterpart in a different department,” Tudge said.

“They may well have said, ‘Listen, we’ve got legal advice on this, our legal advice is sound, we’re disagreeing with Mr Hanks.’”

The Department of Social Services held conflicting internal legal advice on the scheme, including a scathing opinion that it would be unlawful, from 2014. It did not seek an authoritative legal opinion until the middle of 2019 in response to a court action, which subsequently saw the program shut down.

Tudge said he was “greatly annoyed” about a December 2016 A Current Affair news story on the robodebt scheme that quoted him saying: “We’ll find you, we’ll track you down and you will have to repay those debts and you may end up in prison.”

Tudge said he believed the story was going to cover a separate welfare fraud program and he had been taken “completely taken out of context”.

He said he had been replying to the question, “What would you say to people who deliberately commit fraud on the commonwealth?”

Tudge’s evidence, before Catherine Holmes AC SC, continues.


Luke Henriques-Gomes Social affairs and inequality editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Robodebt royal commission told ‘misrepresentation may have made its way into the cabinet’
Bureaucrats from March 2015 insisted in documents that scheme would ‘not change’ how welfare overpayments were calculated, inquiry hears

Luke Henriques-Gomes Social affairs and inequality reporter

07, Dec, 2022 @8:57 AM

Article image
Legal doubts over robodebt raised with government department in 2014, inquiry hears
First day of royal commission hearings told social services department did not seek ‘authoritative’ legal advice until four years after scheme was introduced

Luke Henriques-Gomes

31, Oct, 2022 @6:25 AM

Article image
Robodebt went ahead, despite legal doubts, after earning Scott Morrison’s backing, inquiry hears
The then social services minister wanted Centrelink debt recovery proposal worked up for 2015 budget process, royal commission told

Luke Henriques-Gomes Social affairs and inequality editor

02, Nov, 2022 @7:34 AM

Article image
Public servant was nominated for Australia Day award for role in designing robodebt, inquiry hears
Former human services official Scott Britton also tells royal commission his team were under pressure to propose budget savings when scheme identified

Luke Henriques-Gomes Social affairs and inequality editor

08, Nov, 2022 @5:30 AM

Article image
‘Platitudes and false words’: mother of robodebt victim who took own life tells inquiry of government stonewalling
‘It all became very sly. Everyone was lying and covering each other’s backs,’ royal commission hears

Luke Henriques-Gomes Social affairs and inequality editor

20, Feb, 2023 @6:02 AM

Article image
Inaccuracy of robodebt scheme ‘known issue’ but was ‘only way’ to do more reviews, commission told
Former top lawyer for the Department of Human Services said she relied on another department’s position that income averaging scheme was lawful

Luke Henriques-Gomes Social affairs and inequality editor

30, Jan, 2023 @9:02 AM

Article image
Centrelink worker recounts ‘callous indifference’ from superiors after raising alarm about robodebt
Colleen Taylor tells royal commission that staff were told ‘not to interrogate’ injustices facing welfare recipients

Luke Henriques-Gomes Social affairs and inequality editor

13, Dec, 2022 @10:31 PM

Article image
Alan Tudge’s adviser placed stories in ‘friendly media’ to ‘shut down’ robodebt scandal, royal commission told
Rachelle Miller tells inquiry the then human services minister was ‘very firm’ a media storm over the Centrelink debt recovery scheme needed to be shut down

Luke Henriques-Gomes Social affairs and inequality editor

31, Jan, 2023 @6:34 AM

Article image
Former ministers Alan Tudge and Christian Porter to appear before robodebt inquiry
As human services minister, Tudge was in charge of the scheme when the accuracy of welfare debts was first questioned

Christopher Knaus

17, Jan, 2023 @7:55 AM

Article image
Robodebt: key public officials and debt collectors to appear as royal commission kicks off
Inquiry into botched Centrelink debt recovery scheme starts its first round of hearings on Monday

Luke Henriques-Gomes Social affairs and inequality editor

30, Oct, 2022 @2:00 PM