Raised Warragamba Dam wall risks ‘irreversible harm’ to Aboriginal cultural heritage, NSW report says

Exclusive: study says the NSW government project could lead to the ‘total loss’ of some sites due to flooding

The $1.6bn plan to raise the Warragamba Dam wall would cause “irreversible harm” to Aboriginal cultural heritage, a New South Wales government-commissioned report has found.

Suggesting it is open to Unesco to “provide for modifications to the boundaries of World Heritage properties”, the report said the controversial project could also lead to hundreds of sites of Aboriginal cultural heritage suffering increased flooding, including the “total loss” of some sites.

Prepared on behalf of the project’s proponent, WaterNSW, the report was produced by consultancy firm Niche after an initial assessment was savaged by Indigenous groups and government agencies.

The updated report, obtained by the Guardian, concedes that if the New South Wales government goes ahead with its controversial plan to raise the dam wall there would be “unavoidable” and “irreversible” harm to sites of Aboriginal heritage.

The project, it found, would have a “deleterious effect” on cultural heritage values and cause “additional injury to the wounds of previous dispossession and loss”.

“The project will result in cumulative harm to the intangible values of the cultural landscape through extension of previously unmitigated impact on cultural values from the construction of the Warragamba dam and flooding of the Burragorang valley and its tributary valleys,” the report stated.

“The further flooding of the Burragorang valley will contribute to irreversible harm to the cultural and spiritual connection that Aboriginal people hold to this part of the country, their heritage and the cultural landscape and will obscure the tangible aspects of the creation stories associated with the Burragorang such as the Gurrangatch and Mirrigan story.”

Those harms, it found, could not be directly mitigated. Instead, it recommended “increasing the broader community’s knowledge of Aboriginal history in the Warragamba area” as a way of increasing “intergenerational equity”.

While the report found that more than 250 sites of cultural heritage would be affected by the project – including dozens of new sites including forms of rock art “that are not commonly represented regionally” – it also conceded there was likely to be far more culturally significant artefacts outside its survey area.

The damning report comes amid increasing questions about the controversial project.

The premier, Dominic Perrottet, earlier this month moved to stop the plan being challenged in the courts by designating it as a critical state significant infrastructure project, but it has been the subject of fierce criticism from environment and Aboriginal stakeholders.

On Friday a document obtained by the Wilderness Society via freedom of information laws also raised concerns about the wall raising’s impact on water quality.

The internal Sydney Water document stated that “poorer quality water” stored in the dam “for extended periods” would risk the agency’s water filtration plant’s ability to “operate at capacity and increasing chances of failure to supply water and the need to boil water”.

The Coalition in NSW has sought to make the dam wall an election issue with voters in western Sydney after a spate of flood events in the Hawkesbury-Nepean area.

While expert reports have found it would mitigate flood risk, many experts believe it would be of limited value with potentially disastrous environmental effects.

The Guardian understands WaterNSW officials believe it is unlikely to be ready for approval until after the March election.

Unesco previously raised concerns about the projects impact on the world heritage-listed Blue Mountains area. While the draft report obtained by the Guardian insists increased inundation as a result of the raised wall would not have a “material effect” on the area’s value, it concedes it had “the potential to cause permanent harm through physical impacts to the sites and potential alterations to the waterways and ecology of the project area”.

The NSW government is also banking on a 50-50 funding split on the project with the commonwealth, which has yet to indicate support for the project.

In a statement, a spokesperson for Water NSW said it would not comment on the details of the report “on recognition of important cultural sensitivities associated with the document”.


Michael McGowan

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
NSW minister took just five days to agree to fast-track project to raise Warragamba Dam
Exclusive: Documents show Anthony Roberts made the call in less than a week, after predecessor rejected previous request

Michael McGowan

16, Nov, 2022 @2:00 PM

Article image
NSW vows to raise Warragamba Dam wall even if federal government does not split cost
Dominic Perrottet declines to give timeline for environmental impact assessment but says it has been expedited

Tamsin Rose

18, Oct, 2022 @1:21 AM

Article image
Warragamba Dam: what’s driving the NSW government’s bid to raise the wall?
Premier Dominic Perrottet says his number one priority is protecting people, but others point to political factors

Lisa Cox and Tamsin Rose

05, Oct, 2022 @4:30 PM

Article image
Warragamba Dam wall plan could cause 'irreversible' damage, NSW premier told
Letter from 20 scientists and ex-ministers, including Peter Garrett, condemns plan to raise dam wall

Michael McGowan

02, Oct, 2018 @2:01 AM

Article image
Raising Warragamba Dam probably can’t stop floods. There’s a simpler solution closer to home
Rain is everywhere, like sunshine on solar panels. Why not collect and use it locally, leaving the existing dam for flood mitigation?

Tone Wheeler

30, Oct, 2022 @2:00 PM

Article image
‘People before plants’: NSW premier commits to raising Warragamba Dam wall 14 metres
Government deems controversial project critical state infrastructure in order to have it approved ‘as quickly as possible’

Tamsin Rose and Lisa Cox

05, Oct, 2022 @1:27 AM

Article image
NSW flood inquiry opts not to recommend raising of Warragamba dam wall
Premier says he will push ahead and seek funding to raise wall 14 metres despite concerns for endangered flora and fauna

Peter Hannam

17, Aug, 2022 @6:51 AM

Article image
Raising Warragamba Dam wall flouts Australia’s world heritage obligations, scientists warn
International Union for the Conservation of Nature says NSW government’s plan would inundate Indigenous sites and could create an in-danger listing for Blue Mountains

Lisa Cox

02, Feb, 2022 @12:29 AM

Article image
NSW government document changed to make impacts of raising Warragamba Dam wall ‘less definite’
Review finds consultants were directed to make changes so impacts on biodiversity ‘would be indirect’

Michael McGowan

06, Oct, 2022 @4:30 PM

Article image
WaterNSW claims Warragamba dam wall project stacks up despite not knowing cost of offsets
Agency dismisses criticisms of the project, insisting it will deliver an overall economic benefit

Michael McGowan

21, Nov, 2022 @9:23 AM