Peter Dutton’s claim he planned to buy US nuclear subs is ‘political point-scoring’, defence experts say

Liberal leader is in damage control after his comments raised eyebrows, one analyst saying ‘there’s no way this is a plan’

Experts are critical of Peter Dutton’s claim he planned to buy two US nuclear submarines to plug a looming capability gap, as the Liberal leader goes into damage control over the disclosure.

Dutton has been accused of “political point-scoring” and being “unhelpful” in a campaign to pressure Labor’s Richard Marles to rule out other options to plug the gap between the retirement of Collins class submarines and Australia’s plan to build a nuclear fleet.

On Thursday Dutton, the former defence minister, revealed a plan he devised before the election to buy two Virginia-class submarines by 2030, claiming he had “formed a judgment the Americans would have facilitated exactly that”.

The comments raised eyebrows, both because Australia had not formally decided whether to opt for US or UK nuclear submarines and because experts have suggested it is unlikely the US would give up two of its own submarines by 2030.

Marles labelled the intervention “rank politics” and “completely inconsistent with everything Peter Dutton was doing and saying in government”.

On Friday Dutton responded by claiming Marles, the deputy prime minister and defence minister, was in “witness protection” because he had not done further media on the issue. Marles was in Singapore for the Shangri-La Dialogue with regional counterparts from 30 nations.

Dutton claimed that Marles’s early comments about the submarine issue demonstrated “loud and clear that Labor is thinking about ditching the nuclear submarine plan” – despite Labor repeatedly recommitting to Aukus.

“It would be a disaster for our country,” Dutton told Channel Nine’s Today. “We worked day and night to get that plan in place, and what I’ve said is, only what’s available publicly, and in addition to that, what my thoughts would be on the way forward.”

“If Labor is going to butcher that and they don’t have the money to pay for it they should be upfront and say it.

“That’s the path they’re taking us down at the moment. It’s not in our national interest.”

Marcus Hellyer, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, told Guardian Australia Dutton had “put out an idea or concept”.

“There’s no way this is a plan, it hasn’t been agreed by the US government, nor Australia, nobody has actually agreed to it.”

“If it were a plan it would be a pretty serious kind of breach or leak [to disclose it].”

Hellyer said that Marles is “not on the cusp of an announcement about an interim submarine purchase” and has “every right to look at every option”.

Hellyer said the Americans had insisted on bipartisan support for Aukus, and it was “not great optics” for Dutton to advocate for his idea before a decision.

“Politicians shouldn’t be doing this publicly … My view is it’s not particularly helpful. The US will be thinking ‘what are these guys doing’.”

“No boats are available before 2030 unless the US gives up its own – that would be quite remarkable – the US has been clear there is no way they can build additional submarines.”

The chair of defence studies at the University of Western Australia, Dr Peter Dean, also expressed concerns about Dutton’s intervention.

“I’m sure that the UK wouldn’t be happy to learn from a newspaper article that, potentially, their submarine is not an option and I’m sure there’s plenty of people in the US Congress, the Pentagon and other parts of the US who were very interested to read these possible developments,” Dean reportedly told the ABC.

“These are sensitive negotiations and I think the great concern here is that Peter Dutton has basically worked against the national interest in an attempt for some domestic political point-scoring.”

At a press conference in Sydney on Friday the New Zealand prime minister, Jacinda Ardern, ruled out that Australia’s nuclear submarine purchase would affect the two countries’ alliance.

Ardern said New Zealand’s “policies with regard to nuclear issues are not changing”, meaning nuclear submarines would not be permitted in New Zealand’s waters.

“But nor was there any sense that it’s something that Australia expects us to [do].

“We have, of course, had a longstanding relationship, friendship, partnership, and we’re allies. And so I think those principles are well understood. They are not a point of tension at all.”


Paul Karp

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Defence faces budget blowout with Aukus nuclear submarines to cost more than scrapped French project
New analysis says major programs often end up costing more than is budgeted for and predicts inflation will impact on defence budgets

Daniel Hurst Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

07, Jun, 2022 @5:30 PM

Article image
Australia will have ‘unequivocal’ control over nuclear-powered submarines, insists chief adviser
‘When we take command of our first boat, we will have sovereign capability’, says Vice Admiral Jonathan Mead

Daniel Hurst Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

13, Feb, 2023 @9:38 AM

Article image
Two former defence leaders paid almost $800,000 to review Australia’s military capabilities
Review by Sir Angus Houston and Stephen Smith will respond to increasing challenges in the Pacific and make recommendations ‘for the next decade and beyond’

Daniel Hurst Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

03, Nov, 2022 @2:00 PM

Article image
‘We don’t have limitless resources’: Australian government prepared to scale back defence projects
While Labor has committed to an increase in defence spending, Richard Marles refused to rule out building first nuclear-powered submarines offshore

Daniel Hurst Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

23, Jan, 2023 @2:00 PM

Article image
Aukus nuclear submarine deal will be ‘too big to fail’, Richard Marles says
Australia’s defence minister plays down concerns multi-decade plan could be vulnerable to political changes in the US and UK

Daniel Hurst Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

17, Mar, 2023 @4:09 AM

Article image
Defence officials call for ‘deep reform’ to counter perceptions of inaction on Brereton inquiry
Exclusive: Despite war crimes inquiry saying commanders ‘must bear’ responsibility for what happened on their watch, the previous government suspended punishment against them

Daniel Hurst Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

29, Sep, 2022 @1:05 AM

Article image
‘History will judge us’: Richard Marles commits to defence reform after Afghan war crimes inquiry
Defence minister says Australia must ‘make right this appalling set of circumstances’ and promises to keep parliament informed of progress

Daniel Hurst Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

02, Jul, 2022 @8:00 PM

Article image
Labor accuses Dutton of ‘rank politics’ after Coalition plan to buy US nuclear subs revealed
Peter Dutton calls on Labor to buy two US submarines to fill capability gap despite pending decision over UK and US options

Paul Karp

09, Jun, 2022 @6:26 AM

Article image
ABC staff to walk off job next week – as it happened
This blog is now closed.

Rafqa Touma and Natasha May (earlier)

15, Mar, 2023 @7:50 AM

Article image
Australians unlikely to know cost of scrapped submarines until after election, Peter Dutton says
Defence minister says negotiations with France over abandoned naval agreement will ‘take some time’

Daniel Hurst Foreign affairs and defence correspondent

18, Apr, 2022 @10:04 AM