Up to 100 people released from immigration detention after Australian government loses court case

Advocates welcome ‘significant’ number of releases but raise questions over ‘bizarre’ process

Up to 100 people held in immigration detention have been released over the Christmas period, a move welcomed by advocates calling on Labor to accelerate its commitment to free those who pose a low risk to the public.

Lawyers for asylum seekers and people whose visas were cancelled under the Migration Act’s character provisions reported that dozens had been released every day since 23 December from detention centres including Villawood in Sydney and Melbourne Immigration Transit Accommodation in Broadmeadows.

Advocates believe that some releases may have been triggered by the federal government losing a full federal court case on 22 December, in which the court ruled that aggregate sentences should not trigger automatic visa cancellation.

William Levingston, a solicitor at Christopher Levingston & Associates, said his clients in detention estimated that 24 people were released on Tuesday from Villawood and 16 from Mita.

Levingston said the process was “bizarre”, with some detainees “surprised or ambushed” with paperwork announcing their release but not told what visas they were receiving.

The federal court heard that New Zealander Kate Pearson’s visa was automatically cancelled because she was sentenced to a maximum term of imprisonment of four years and three months in respect of 10 offences.

The court ruled that because Pearson’s was an aggregate sentence, not a sentence for one offence with a term of imprisonment of 12 months or more, her visa “was not amenable to mandatory cancellation”.

However, the court’s judgment still allows the minister to exert the discretionary power to cancel visas.

No orders have been made for Pearson’s release yet, and the government will not consider whether to appeal until orders are made.

A spokesperson for the home affairs department told Guardian Australia it was “actively considering the implications” of the ruling, including identifying “other visa cancellation decisions affected by the judgment, prioritising individuals in immigration detention”.

“Individuals in immigration detention where visa cancellation decisions are identified as having been invalidly made will be released from immigration detention as soon as possible.

“However, this is an involved process which could take some days to complete.”

Levingston said “hundreds” of detainees could be affected by the Pearson decision – although others reported an uptick in releases that seem unrelated to the case.

The government has been examining alternatives to immigration detention to clear what the home affairs department calls an “intractable” caseload of people in detention. In April, 61% of the 1,400 people in detention were there due to visa cancellation, while the average time spent in detention was 726 days.

In September the immigration minister, Andrew Giles, said the government was “committed to ensuring humane and risk-based immigration detention policies”.

“If there are no security or safety concerns, individuals should be living in the community until a durable solution is finalised,” he said.

Guardian Australia understands the most recent releases were triggered by the department, not direct ministerial intervention.

Immigration lawyer Ziya Zarifi said a large number of detainees had been released, but lawyers were “unsure whether they are being returned on their original visas or they are being released on a bridging visa”.

The principal solicitor at the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre, Hannah Dickinson, said the centre was aware of “more releases than we’ve seen in a very long time in the most recent couple of weeks – including people detained for significant periods”.

“It’s been really heartening to see the release of a lot of people whose detention was quite senseless, and years long … [and] to see many were able to be reunited with their families in time for end of the year.”

Dickinson said correcting the possibly “huge numbers of unlawful decisions” affected by the Pearson case must include rectifying family separation, and reversing the deportation of those removed due to that section of the Migration Act.

Alison Battisson, the director principal of Human Rights for All, said there had been “a reasonably significant number of releases” in recent months, calling it “a much, much more humane, legal and economically rational approach to immigration detention”.

Giles’s office has been contacted for comment.

Contributor

Paul Karp

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Malaysian hitman released from Australian immigration detention after high court ruling
Sirul Azhar Umar, sentenced in Malaysia over a politically charged murder, cannot be deported by Australia because he would face the death penalty

Christopher Knaus and Paul Karp

12, Nov, 2023 @2:26 AM

Article image
Indefinite immigration detention ruled unlawful in landmark Australian high court decision
Decision overturns 20-year-old precedent and could trigger immediate release of 92 people, with detention of 340 others also in doubt

Paul Karp Chief political correspondent

08, Nov, 2023 @7:50 AM

Article image
More than 170 immigration detainees could be freed if Australian government loses high court challenge
Exclusive: Number of detainees who refuse to cooperate with deportation is larger than thought, leaked internal estimate reveals

Paul Karp Chief political correspondent

19, Mar, 2024 @2:00 PM

Article image
Eighty people already freed from Australia’s immigration detention since landmark high court ruling
Minister seeks to allay community concern about releases but admits ‘full ramifications’ of decision yet to be determined

Paul Karp Chief political correspondent

12, Nov, 2023 @10:17 PM

Article image
Refugee brings court case over threat of Covid-19 in Australian detention
Challenge seen as test case for other asylum seekers living in close confines and comes as medical experts urge reduction in numbers held in detention

Ben Doherty

22, Apr, 2020 @3:35 AM

Article image
Immigration detention: Labor to rush through emergency legislation after high court ruling
Home affairs minister says it’s ‘garbage’ that legislation could completely reverse high court decision that led to 83 leaving immigration detention

Paul Karp Chief political correspondent

15, Nov, 2023 @4:46 AM

Article image
Immigration detention: Rohingya refugee NZYQ freed after high court case did not show remorse for raping 10-year-old
Psychologist noted ‘risk factors’ for possible reoffending including ‘attitudes’ stemming from his own childhood abuse, court documents reveal

Paul Karp Chief political correspondent

22, Nov, 2023 @2:42 AM

Article image
Labor’s ‘draconian’ immigration detention conditions challenged in high court
Chinese refugee S151 has sparked the challenge, arguing his curfew and wearing of ankle bracelet is punishment

Paul Karp Chief political correspondent

22, Nov, 2023 @6:45 AM

Article image
Labor to enact ‘preventive detention’ regime after high court reveals reasons for immigration ruling
Government may be able to redetain high-risk offenders within days under new laws Labor will seek to pass before parliament rises

Paul Karp Chief political correspondent

28, Nov, 2023 @4:23 AM

Article image
Labor commits $255m for security agencies to monitor people released from indefinite detention
A joint operation between the Australian federal police and Australian Border Force will monitor strict new conditions placed upon detainees

Amy Remeikis

26, Nov, 2023 @2:00 PM